Assessing the Rate and Quality of Breast Cancer Treatment Following Initial Diagnosis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Jared Gregston, Nancy Etzold, Natalie Stratemeier, Shearwood McClelland
{"title":"Assessing the Rate and Quality of Breast Cancer Treatment Following Initial Diagnosis.","authors":"Jared Gregston, Nancy Etzold, Natalie Stratemeier, Shearwood McClelland","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Care guidelines recommend specific treatment pathways for early-stage breast cancer, but real-world adherence may vary due to institutional workflow and system-level limitations. This study examined rates of guideline-concordant care (GCC) at a single academic medical center over 5 years and evaluated differences by stage, patient demographics and time frame involving the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed of all women diagnosed with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage 0-III breast cancer at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center between September 1, 2019, and September 1, 2024. GCC was defined according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines as mastectomy alone, lumpectomy with radiation, or lumpectomy alone in patients ≥70. Demographic and clinical data were extracted, and rates of GCC were assessed by stage, race, insurance type, and for variance during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1455 patients diagnosed with stage 0-III breast cancer, 981 (67.4%) received some form of treatment, and 515 (35.4%) received GCC. Stage II patients had the lowest rate of GCC (28.7%). Rates of GCC remained stable before and after April 2020, though total diagnoses declined. Black patients had the highest rate of GCC (52.1%), while Asian/Pacific Islander patients had the lowest (21.9%). No clear relationship was observed between insurance type or ZIP code-based income and GCC receipt.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients diagnosed with breast cancer received treatment, but fewer than half met criteria for GCC. Differences in GCC rate by stage and race suggest both institutional and patient-level barriers to standard care. System improvements aimed at strengthening coordination between diagnosis and treatment may help increase adherence to guideline-based breast cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001229","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Care guidelines recommend specific treatment pathways for early-stage breast cancer, but real-world adherence may vary due to institutional workflow and system-level limitations. This study examined rates of guideline-concordant care (GCC) at a single academic medical center over 5 years and evaluated differences by stage, patient demographics and time frame involving the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all women diagnosed with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage 0-III breast cancer at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center between September 1, 2019, and September 1, 2024. GCC was defined according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines as mastectomy alone, lumpectomy with radiation, or lumpectomy alone in patients ≥70. Demographic and clinical data were extracted, and rates of GCC were assessed by stage, race, insurance type, and for variance during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results: Among 1455 patients diagnosed with stage 0-III breast cancer, 981 (67.4%) received some form of treatment, and 515 (35.4%) received GCC. Stage II patients had the lowest rate of GCC (28.7%). Rates of GCC remained stable before and after April 2020, though total diagnoses declined. Black patients had the highest rate of GCC (52.1%), while Asian/Pacific Islander patients had the lowest (21.9%). No clear relationship was observed between insurance type or ZIP code-based income and GCC receipt.

Conclusions: Most patients diagnosed with breast cancer received treatment, but fewer than half met criteria for GCC. Differences in GCC rate by stage and race suggest both institutional and patient-level barriers to standard care. System improvements aimed at strengthening coordination between diagnosis and treatment may help increase adherence to guideline-based breast cancer care.

评估乳腺癌初始诊断后治疗的率和质量。
目的:护理指南推荐早期乳腺癌的特定治疗途径,但实际依从性可能因机构工作流程和系统级别的限制而有所不同。本研究调查了一个学术医疗中心5年来指南-一致性护理(GCC)的比率,并评估了涉及COVID-19大流行的分期、患者人口统计学和时间框架的差异。方法:对2019年9月1日至2024年9月1日期间在美国国家癌症研究所指定的癌症中心诊断为美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC) 0-III期乳腺癌的所有女性进行回顾性研究。根据国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南,GCC被定义为≥70的患者单独进行乳房切除术、乳房肿瘤切除术联合放疗或单独进行乳房肿瘤切除术。提取人口统计学和临床数据,并按阶段、种族、保险类型和COVID-19大流行期间的差异评估GCC的发生率。结果:在1455例诊断为0-III期乳腺癌的患者中,981例(67.4%)接受了某种形式的治疗,515例(35.4%)接受了GCC。II期患者的GCC发生率最低(28.7%)。尽管总诊断率下降,但在2020年4月前后,GCC的发病率保持稳定。黑人患者GCC发生率最高(52.1%),亚洲/太平洋岛民患者最低(21.9%)。保险类型或基于邮政编码的收入与GCC收入之间没有明显的关系。结论:大多数被诊断为乳腺癌的患者接受了治疗,但只有不到一半的患者符合GCC标准。不同阶段和种族的GCC发生率的差异表明机构和患者层面对标准治疗存在障碍。旨在加强诊断和治疗之间协调的系统改进可能有助于提高对基于指南的乳腺癌护理的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信