A phase II pilot randomized controlled trial of an integrated stepped collaborative care intervention for patients awaiting kidney transplantation (CARES-transplant).
Cramer J Kallem, Amit A Tevar, Tyler Bradley, Heather Jackson, Denise Haggerty, Hannah Cheng, Ritambhara Pathak, Yisi Wang, Maureen Carney, Shelby Gardner, Athrva Deshpande, Manisha Jhamb, Jennifer L Steel
{"title":"A phase II pilot randomized controlled trial of an integrated stepped collaborative care intervention for patients awaiting kidney transplantation (CARES-transplant).","authors":"Cramer J Kallem, Amit A Tevar, Tyler Bradley, Heather Jackson, Denise Haggerty, Hannah Cheng, Ritambhara Pathak, Yisi Wang, Maureen Carney, Shelby Gardner, Athrva Deshpande, Manisha Jhamb, Jennifer L Steel","doi":"10.1007/s10865-025-00574-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients awaiting kidney transplant carry a high symptom burden which has been associated with waitlist inactivation, mortality, and poorer post-transplant outcomes. However, few studies have tested the effects of symptom management interventions in this population. This Phase II study aimed to (1) test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an integrated stepped collaborative care intervention (CARES-Transplant) on patient-reported outcomes and unplanned healthcare utilization, and (2) explore treatment effects on family caregiver outcomes. The study was a randomized controlled trial designed to test the efficacy of CARES-Transplant versus standard of care (SC). Patients completed a battery of questionnaires at baseline and 3-months including the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale, Brief Pain Inventory, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, and Rand Short Form-36. Caregivers were administered the CES-D, Perceived Stress Scale, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at baseline and 3-months. Patient unplanned health care utilization was assessed over the course of one-year post-randomization. Nineteen patients (mean age = 65 ± 6 years, 74% male, 90% White) and 8 caregivers (mean age = 61.3 ± 8.1 years, 100% female and white) were randomized. Reductions in pain intensity and interference were observed for CARES (- 0.2) while patients in the SC arm had increases in pain intensity and interference (+ 1.3, ES = 0.30). Similar trends were observed for fatigue (CARES = - 0.4 versus SC = - 7.7, ES = 0.41) and depressive symptoms (CARES = - 2.0 versus SC = + 2.33, ES = 0.56). Lower rates of transplant-related complications (CARES mean = 1 versus SC = 3), fewer emergency room visits (CARES = 1.0 versus SC = 2.67) and 90-day readmissions (CARES = 0% versus SC = 28.6%) were also observed. A moderate to large effect size was observed for changes on caregiver reported depressive symptoms (CARES = + 0.5 versus SC = + 3.3, ES = 0.55) and sleep quality (CARES = - 1.5 versus SC = + 0.07, ES = 0.34). The findings of this pilot study warrant a Phase III trial to test the efficacy of CARES-Transplant.Clinical trials registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02938351.</p>","PeriodicalId":48329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-025-00574-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Patients awaiting kidney transplant carry a high symptom burden which has been associated with waitlist inactivation, mortality, and poorer post-transplant outcomes. However, few studies have tested the effects of symptom management interventions in this population. This Phase II study aimed to (1) test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an integrated stepped collaborative care intervention (CARES-Transplant) on patient-reported outcomes and unplanned healthcare utilization, and (2) explore treatment effects on family caregiver outcomes. The study was a randomized controlled trial designed to test the efficacy of CARES-Transplant versus standard of care (SC). Patients completed a battery of questionnaires at baseline and 3-months including the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale, Brief Pain Inventory, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, and Rand Short Form-36. Caregivers were administered the CES-D, Perceived Stress Scale, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at baseline and 3-months. Patient unplanned health care utilization was assessed over the course of one-year post-randomization. Nineteen patients (mean age = 65 ± 6 years, 74% male, 90% White) and 8 caregivers (mean age = 61.3 ± 8.1 years, 100% female and white) were randomized. Reductions in pain intensity and interference were observed for CARES (- 0.2) while patients in the SC arm had increases in pain intensity and interference (+ 1.3, ES = 0.30). Similar trends were observed for fatigue (CARES = - 0.4 versus SC = - 7.7, ES = 0.41) and depressive symptoms (CARES = - 2.0 versus SC = + 2.33, ES = 0.56). Lower rates of transplant-related complications (CARES mean = 1 versus SC = 3), fewer emergency room visits (CARES = 1.0 versus SC = 2.67) and 90-day readmissions (CARES = 0% versus SC = 28.6%) were also observed. A moderate to large effect size was observed for changes on caregiver reported depressive symptoms (CARES = + 0.5 versus SC = + 3.3, ES = 0.55) and sleep quality (CARES = - 1.5 versus SC = + 0.07, ES = 0.34). The findings of this pilot study warrant a Phase III trial to test the efficacy of CARES-Transplant.Clinical trials registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02938351.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Behavioral Medicine is a broadly conceived interdisciplinary publication devoted to furthering understanding of physical health and illness through the knowledge, methods, and techniques of behavioral science. A significant function of the journal is the application of this knowledge to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and to the promotion of health at the individual, community, and population levels.The content of the journal spans all areas of basic and applied behavioral medicine research, conducted in and informed by all related disciplines including but not limited to: psychology, medicine, the public health sciences, sociology, anthropology, health economics, nursing, and biostatistics. Topics welcomed include but are not limited to: prevention of disease and health promotion; the effects of psychological stress on physical and psychological functioning; sociocultural influences on health and illness; adherence to medical regimens; the study of health related behaviors including tobacco use, substance use, sexual behavior, physical activity, and obesity; health services research; and behavioral factors in the prevention and treatment of somatic disorders. Reports of interdisciplinary approaches to research are particularly welcomed.