The Relations of Nursing Clinical Teacher Effectiveness, Clinical Belongingness Sense, and Compassionate Competencies among Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Correlation Study.

Sima Pourteimour, Mohammadali Hosseini
{"title":"The Relations of Nursing Clinical Teacher Effectiveness, Clinical Belongingness Sense, and Compassionate Competencies among Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Correlation Study.","authors":"Sima Pourteimour, Mohammadali Hosseini","doi":"10.30476/jamp.2025.105124.2096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nursing teachers influence their students' views and values, creating Compassionate Competence (CC) and Clinical Belonging Sence (CBS). Their work extends beyond technical abilities, as they foster empathy and community in order to provide good patient care. The purpose of this study was to examine the link between CC and CBS and Nursing Clinical Teacher Effectiveness (NCTE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional correlation study was conducted on 237 nursing students (response rate of 94.5%) selected using census sampling; the Belongingness Scale-Clinical Placement Experience (BES-CPE), Compassionate Competence Scale, and Nursing Clinical Teacher Effectiveness Inventory were used to collect the data. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Chi-square test, the Pearson correlation test, and the linear regression test in SPSS (ver.16).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both discovered factors account for 21.4% of CC, with a positive connection with NCTE (r=0.392, P=0.001) and CBS (r=0.564, P=0.001). CBS and CC also showed a strong positive connection (r=0.424, P=0.001). NCTE can explain why CBS (31.42%) is nearly twice as high as CC (16.06%) among nursing students. NCTE teaching skill was positively connected with self-esteem (r=0.544, P=0.001), CBS efficiency (r=0.528, P=0.001), continuity (r=0.367, P=0.001), and CC insight (r=0.374, P=0.001). Interpersonal communication and personality qualities in NCTE had a moderate connection with efficiency (r=0.491, P=0.001) and self-esteem (r=0.468, P=0.001) in CBS. Furthermore, female students received considerably higher NCTE scores than male students (P=0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuous training for clinical faculty is essential for mentoring nursing students, improving their skills and attitudes toward quality patient care and instilling a sense of belonging and compassion.</p>","PeriodicalId":30645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism","volume":"13 3","pages":"225-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12238871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2025.105124.2096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Nursing teachers influence their students' views and values, creating Compassionate Competence (CC) and Clinical Belonging Sence (CBS). Their work extends beyond technical abilities, as they foster empathy and community in order to provide good patient care. The purpose of this study was to examine the link between CC and CBS and Nursing Clinical Teacher Effectiveness (NCTE).

Methods: This cross-sectional correlation study was conducted on 237 nursing students (response rate of 94.5%) selected using census sampling; the Belongingness Scale-Clinical Placement Experience (BES-CPE), Compassionate Competence Scale, and Nursing Clinical Teacher Effectiveness Inventory were used to collect the data. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Chi-square test, the Pearson correlation test, and the linear regression test in SPSS (ver.16).

Results: Both discovered factors account for 21.4% of CC, with a positive connection with NCTE (r=0.392, P=0.001) and CBS (r=0.564, P=0.001). CBS and CC also showed a strong positive connection (r=0.424, P=0.001). NCTE can explain why CBS (31.42%) is nearly twice as high as CC (16.06%) among nursing students. NCTE teaching skill was positively connected with self-esteem (r=0.544, P=0.001), CBS efficiency (r=0.528, P=0.001), continuity (r=0.367, P=0.001), and CC insight (r=0.374, P=0.001). Interpersonal communication and personality qualities in NCTE had a moderate connection with efficiency (r=0.491, P=0.001) and self-esteem (r=0.468, P=0.001) in CBS. Furthermore, female students received considerably higher NCTE scores than male students (P=0.012).

Conclusions: Continuous training for clinical faculty is essential for mentoring nursing students, improving their skills and attitudes toward quality patient care and instilling a sense of belonging and compassion.

本科护生护理临床教师效能、临床归属感与同情胜任力的关系:横断面相关研究。
导读:护理教师影响学生的观点和价值观,创造同情能力(CC)和临床归属感(CBS)。他们的工作超越了技术能力,因为他们培养同理心和社区,以提供良好的病人护理。本研究的目的是探讨CC、CBS与护理临床教师效能(NCTE)之间的关系。方法:采用普查抽样方法对237名护生(回复率94.5%)进行横断面相关性研究;采用归属感量表-临床实习经验量表(BES-CPE)、同情能力量表和护理临床教师效能量表收集数据。数据分析采用描述性统计、卡方检验、Pearson相关检验和SPSS (ver.16)线性回归检验。结果:这两个因素占CC的21.4%,与NCTE (r=0.392, P=0.001)和CBS (r=0.564, P=0.001)呈正相关。CBS与CC也呈显著正相关(r=0.424, P=0.001)。NCTE可以解释为什么护生的CBS(31.42%)几乎是CC(16.06%)的两倍。NCTE教学技能与自尊(r=0.544, P=0.001)、CBS效率(r=0.528, P=0.001)、连续性(r=0.367, P=0.001)、CC洞察力(r=0.374, P=0.001)呈正相关。NCTE的人际沟通和人格品质与CBS的效率(r=0.491, P=0.001)和自尊(r=0.468, P=0.001)有中等程度的关联。女生的NCTE成绩显著高于男生(P=0.012)。结论:临床教师的持续培训对于指导护理学生,提高他们的技能和态度,以优质的病人护理和灌输归属感和同情心是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism
Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信