Role of Metacognitive Awareness and Academic Motivation in Medical Undergraduates' Academic Performance: An Observational Study.

Namita Deshmukh, Avinash Borkar, Hirkani Munira Abbas, Sharmila Jalgaonkar
{"title":"Role of Metacognitive Awareness and Academic Motivation in Medical Undergraduates' Academic Performance: An Observational Study.","authors":"Namita Deshmukh, Avinash Borkar, Hirkani Munira Abbas, Sharmila Jalgaonkar","doi":"10.30476/jamp.2025.105384.2107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medical students' performance is influenced by metacognitive awareness and regulation, alongside self-determination or motivation. Understanding these elements is crucial for creating a curriculum that enhances learning outcomes and academic achievement. This study aimed to assess metacognitive awareness and academic motivation among medical undergraduate (UG) students and to determine the association between metacognitive awareness, academic motivation, and academic performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was carried out at a medical college on 140 medical undergraduate (UG) students. The data were collected using self-administered questionnaires using Metacognition Awareness Inventory (MAI) and Academic Motivation Scale (AMS). The scores obtained were compared with their academic performance. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 20.0. The chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and post-hoc Dunn's test were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants included 54.3% males and 45.7% females (age 20.4±0.9 years). High performers scored significantly higher on total (43.14±8.2) and domain-wise MAI scores compared to average and low performers. Female students scored better in all metacognitive domains (40.4±8.0) and had higher motivation scores than males (42.9±10.35). Academic performance was significantly correlated with metacognition regulation subscale scores (r=0.293, p=0.001) and intrinsic motivation scores (r=0.284, p=0.002). Also, metacognition regulation was significantly correlated with intrinsic motivation scores (r=0.376, p=0.00001) as well as extrinsic motivation scores (r=0.223, p=0.01). Intrinsic motivation scores correlated significantly with academic performance, metacognition knowledge subscale scores (r=0.406, p=0.00001), regulation scores, and extrinsic motivation scores (r=0.695, p=0.00001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High performers demonstrate superior metacognitive awareness and intrinsic motivation, especially females. Significant correlations between metacognition, motivation, and academic performance stress the importance of integrating metacognitive regulation strategies into teaching methods to improve the outcomes and motivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":30645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism","volume":"13 3","pages":"198-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12238864/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2025.105384.2107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Medical students' performance is influenced by metacognitive awareness and regulation, alongside self-determination or motivation. Understanding these elements is crucial for creating a curriculum that enhances learning outcomes and academic achievement. This study aimed to assess metacognitive awareness and academic motivation among medical undergraduate (UG) students and to determine the association between metacognitive awareness, academic motivation, and academic performance.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out at a medical college on 140 medical undergraduate (UG) students. The data were collected using self-administered questionnaires using Metacognition Awareness Inventory (MAI) and Academic Motivation Scale (AMS). The scores obtained were compared with their academic performance. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 20.0. The chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and post-hoc Dunn's test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The participants included 54.3% males and 45.7% females (age 20.4±0.9 years). High performers scored significantly higher on total (43.14±8.2) and domain-wise MAI scores compared to average and low performers. Female students scored better in all metacognitive domains (40.4±8.0) and had higher motivation scores than males (42.9±10.35). Academic performance was significantly correlated with metacognition regulation subscale scores (r=0.293, p=0.001) and intrinsic motivation scores (r=0.284, p=0.002). Also, metacognition regulation was significantly correlated with intrinsic motivation scores (r=0.376, p=0.00001) as well as extrinsic motivation scores (r=0.223, p=0.01). Intrinsic motivation scores correlated significantly with academic performance, metacognition knowledge subscale scores (r=0.406, p=0.00001), regulation scores, and extrinsic motivation scores (r=0.695, p=0.00001).

Conclusions: High performers demonstrate superior metacognitive awareness and intrinsic motivation, especially females. Significant correlations between metacognition, motivation, and academic performance stress the importance of integrating metacognitive regulation strategies into teaching methods to improve the outcomes and motivation.

元认知意识和学业动机在医学本科生学业成绩中的作用:一项观察研究。
医学生的表现受元认知意识和调节的影响,同时受自我决定或动机的影响。了解这些因素对于创建一个提高学习成果和学术成就的课程至关重要。本研究旨在评估医学本科学生的元认知意识和学业动机,并确定元认知意识、学业动机和学业成绩之间的关系。方法:对某医学院140名医学本科生进行横断面调查。采用元认知意识量表(MAI)和学业动机量表(AMS)进行问卷调查。将获得的分数与他们的学习成绩进行比较。采用IBM SPSS 20.0对数据进行分析。统计学分析采用卡方检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验和事后Dunn检验。结果:男性54.3%,女性45.7%,年龄20.4±0.9岁。与平均水平和低水平的人相比,高水平的人在MAI总分(43.14±8.2)和领域得分上明显更高。女生在各元认知领域得分均高于男生(40.4±8.0),动机得分高于男生(42.9±10.35)。学业成绩与元认知调节子量表得分(r=0.293, p=0.001)和内在动机得分(r=0.284, p=0.002)显著相关。元认知调节与内在动机得分显著相关(r=0.376, p=0.00001),与外在动机得分显著相关(r=0.223, p=0.01)。内在动机得分与学业成绩、元认知知识子量表得分(r=0.406, p=0.00001)、规则得分和外在动机得分(r=0.695, p=0.00001)显著相关。结论:高绩效者表现出优越的元认知意识和内在动机,尤其是女性。元认知、动机和学习成绩之间的显著相关性强调了将元认知调节策略整合到教学方法中以改善结果和动机的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism
Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信