Nursing Students' Perspectives on the Relationship between Virtual Reality Simulation and Clinical Decision-Making, Confidence, and Anxiety: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Hazem Alfanash, Mahmoud Al-Kalaldeh, Khaldoon Alnawafleh, Wesam Almagharbeh
{"title":"Nursing Students' Perspectives on the Relationship between Virtual Reality Simulation and Clinical Decision-Making, Confidence, and Anxiety: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Hazem Alfanash, Mahmoud Al-Kalaldeh, Khaldoon Alnawafleh, Wesam Almagharbeh","doi":"10.30476/jamp.2025.105619.2115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study addresses this gap by assessing the relationship of VR simulation with improving clinical decision-making, confidence, and anxiety reduction among nursing students. The aim of this study is the relationship between virtual reality simulation and their clinical decision-making, confidence, and anxiety reduction using a cross-sectional study from the perspectives of nursing students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study surveyed 200 nursing students enrolled in clinical courses utilizing virtual reality (VR) simulation for educational purposes. A structured questionnaire was used to assess their clinical decision-making, confidence, and anxiety reduction following the VR simulation course. The survey included scales validated through a panel of experts and questionnaire validation methodologies, using a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, and inferential statistical tests, including Pearson's correlation and independent-sample t-tests, were conducted to examine the associations. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess the predictive value of confidence and anxiety on clinical decision-making while controlling demographic variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 200 nursing students participated in the study. The mean (SD) clinical decision-making score was 3.16 (1.23) out of 5, while confidence and anxiety reduction scores were 2.64 (1.34) and 2.49 (1.32), respectively. No significant correlation was found between decision-making and confidence (r=-0.079, p=0.264) or anxiety scores (r=0.121, p=0.088), but confidence and anxiety scores showed a weak direct correlation (r=0.180, p=0.011). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that confidence and anxiety were not significant predictors of decision-making, but gender was a significant predictor, with males scoring higher (β=0.19, p=0.041).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While VR directly influences decision-making, it has a limited association with changes in nursing students' confidence and anxiety levels. These findings suggest that VR simulation alone may not be sufficient for enhancing confidence and reducing anxiety and should be integrated with other instructional strategies to maximize its effectiveness in nursing education. Future studies should explore complementary training methods to improve clinical preparedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":30645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism","volume":"13 3","pages":"191-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12238869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2025.105619.2115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study addresses this gap by assessing the relationship of VR simulation with improving clinical decision-making, confidence, and anxiety reduction among nursing students. The aim of this study is the relationship between virtual reality simulation and their clinical decision-making, confidence, and anxiety reduction using a cross-sectional study from the perspectives of nursing students.

Methods: This cross-sectional study surveyed 200 nursing students enrolled in clinical courses utilizing virtual reality (VR) simulation for educational purposes. A structured questionnaire was used to assess their clinical decision-making, confidence, and anxiety reduction following the VR simulation course. The survey included scales validated through a panel of experts and questionnaire validation methodologies, using a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, and inferential statistical tests, including Pearson's correlation and independent-sample t-tests, were conducted to examine the associations. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess the predictive value of confidence and anxiety on clinical decision-making while controlling demographic variables.

Results: A total of 200 nursing students participated in the study. The mean (SD) clinical decision-making score was 3.16 (1.23) out of 5, while confidence and anxiety reduction scores were 2.64 (1.34) and 2.49 (1.32), respectively. No significant correlation was found between decision-making and confidence (r=-0.079, p=0.264) or anxiety scores (r=0.121, p=0.088), but confidence and anxiety scores showed a weak direct correlation (r=0.180, p=0.011). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that confidence and anxiety were not significant predictors of decision-making, but gender was a significant predictor, with males scoring higher (β=0.19, p=0.041).

Conclusions: While VR directly influences decision-making, it has a limited association with changes in nursing students' confidence and anxiety levels. These findings suggest that VR simulation alone may not be sufficient for enhancing confidence and reducing anxiety and should be integrated with other instructional strategies to maximize its effectiveness in nursing education. Future studies should explore complementary training methods to improve clinical preparedness.

护理学生对虚拟现实模拟与临床决策、信心和焦虑关系的看法:一项横断面研究。
本研究通过评估虚拟现实模拟与改善护理学生临床决策、信心和焦虑减少的关系来解决这一差距。本研究旨在探讨虚拟实境模拟与护生临床决策、信心及焦虑减少的关系。方法:本横断面研究调查了200名在临床课程中使用虚拟现实(VR)模拟教学的护理学生。采用结构化问卷来评估他们在VR模拟课程后的临床决策、信心和焦虑减少情况。调查包括通过专家小组和问卷验证方法验证的量表,使用5分李克特量表。采用描述性统计对数据进行汇总,并采用推理统计检验,包括Pearson相关检验和独立样本t检验来检验相关性。在控制人口学变量的情况下,采用多元线性回归分析评估信心和焦虑对临床决策的预测价值。结果:共200名护生参与本研究。平均(SD)临床决策评分为3.16分(1.23分),而信心和焦虑减轻评分分别为2.64分(1.34分)和2.49分(1.32分)。决策与自信(r=-0.079, p=0.264)、焦虑得分(r=0.121, p=0.088)无显著相关,但自信与焦虑得分呈弱直接相关(r=0.180, p=0.011)。多元线性回归分析显示,自信和焦虑对决策的影响不显著,性别对决策的影响显著,且男性得分更高(β=0.19, p=0.041)。结论:虚拟现实直接影响护生决策,但与护生信心和焦虑水平的变化相关性有限。这些研究结果表明,单独的VR模拟可能不足以增强信心和减少焦虑,应与其他教学策略相结合,以最大限度地提高其在护理教育中的有效性。未来的研究应探索补充培训的方法,以提高临床准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism
Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信