Univent tube for thoracoscopic thymectomy in myasthenic patients anesthetized without neuromuscular blocking agents: An observational study.

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-16 DOI:10.4103/sja.sja_580_24
Vo Van Hien, Nguyen Huu Tu, Nguyen Dang Thu
{"title":"Univent tube for thoracoscopic thymectomy in myasthenic patients anesthetized without neuromuscular blocking agents: An observational study.","authors":"Vo Van Hien, Nguyen Huu Tu, Nguyen Dang Thu","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_580_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Myasthenia gravis (MG) patients undergoing surgery may opt for general anesthesia without neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs). The univent tube, featuring a single lumen with bronchial blockers, is known for its flexibility and preference in challenging intubations, reducing airway damage during one-lung ventilation. This study assesses the safety and feasibility of utilizing the univent tube for thoracoscopic thymectomy in MG patients under general anesthesia without NMBAs, complemented by airway topical anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, prospective observational study, 83 consecutive MG patients underwent thoracoscopic thymectomy with univent tube intubation. General anesthesia without NMBAs and airway topical anesthesia were administered. Emphasis was placed on intubation conditions, surgical aspects, intraoperative respiratory, and airway complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinically acceptable intubation conditions were achieved in 99% of patients, with 80% rated as 'excellent' and 19% as 'good.' No cases experienced intubation failure, and 2% exhibited reactions to tracheal tube insertion. Higher MG stages correlated with more favorable intubation conditions, particularly during laryngoscopy. Surgical conditions were excellent in 89%, and blocking the right lung increased total lung collapse, enhancing surgical conditions. Intraoperative ventilation was sufficient for all cases. Incidences of bronchial and vocal cord injuries were 6% and 10%, respectively, with no hematoma cases. Postoperative sore throat (12%) and hoarseness (6%) resolved within three days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the potential benefits of NMBAs, the univent tube proved safe and effective for thoracoscopic thymectomy in MG patients without NMBAs, with higher MG stages associated with improved intubation conditions and enhanced surgical conditions with right-side bronchial blockage.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"19 3","pages":"257-265"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12240507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_580_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Myasthenia gravis (MG) patients undergoing surgery may opt for general anesthesia without neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs). The univent tube, featuring a single lumen with bronchial blockers, is known for its flexibility and preference in challenging intubations, reducing airway damage during one-lung ventilation. This study assesses the safety and feasibility of utilizing the univent tube for thoracoscopic thymectomy in MG patients under general anesthesia without NMBAs, complemented by airway topical anesthesia.

Methods: In this single-center, prospective observational study, 83 consecutive MG patients underwent thoracoscopic thymectomy with univent tube intubation. General anesthesia without NMBAs and airway topical anesthesia were administered. Emphasis was placed on intubation conditions, surgical aspects, intraoperative respiratory, and airway complications.

Results: Clinically acceptable intubation conditions were achieved in 99% of patients, with 80% rated as 'excellent' and 19% as 'good.' No cases experienced intubation failure, and 2% exhibited reactions to tracheal tube insertion. Higher MG stages correlated with more favorable intubation conditions, particularly during laryngoscopy. Surgical conditions were excellent in 89%, and blocking the right lung increased total lung collapse, enhancing surgical conditions. Intraoperative ventilation was sufficient for all cases. Incidences of bronchial and vocal cord injuries were 6% and 10%, respectively, with no hematoma cases. Postoperative sore throat (12%) and hoarseness (6%) resolved within three days.

Conclusions: Despite the potential benefits of NMBAs, the univent tube proved safe and effective for thoracoscopic thymectomy in MG patients without NMBAs, with higher MG stages associated with improved intubation conditions and enhanced surgical conditions with right-side bronchial blockage.

无神经肌肉阻滞剂麻醉的肌无力患者胸腔镜胸腺切除术的联合插管:一项观察性研究。
背景:接受手术的重症肌无力(MG)患者可能会选择不使用神经肌肉阻滞剂(nmba)的全身麻醉。univent管,具有单个管腔和支气管阻滞剂,以其灵活性和优先选择具有挑战性的插管而闻名,减少单肺通气时气道损伤。本研究评估在全麻不加NMBAs,辅以气道表面麻醉的情况下,胸腔镜胸腺切除术中应用univent管的安全性和可行性。方法:在这项单中心、前瞻性观察性研究中,83例MG患者连续接受胸腔镜胸腺切除术和单孔管插管。全麻不加nmba,气道表面麻醉。重点放在插管条件,手术方面,术中呼吸和气道并发症。结果:99%的患者达到了临床可接受的插管条件,其中80%被评为“优秀”,19%被评为“良好”。没有病例出现插管失败,2%的患者出现气管插管反应。MG分期越高,插管条件越有利,尤其是在喉镜检查时。89%的手术条件很好,阻断右肺增加了全肺塌陷,改善了手术条件。所有病例术中通气均足够。支气管和声带损伤发生率分别为6%和10%,无血肿病例。术后喉咙痛(12%)和声音嘶哑(6%)在三天内消退。结论:尽管NMBAs具有潜在的益处,但对于无NMBAs的MG患者,胸腔镜胸腺切除术使用univent管是安全有效的,MG分期越高,插管条件越好,右侧支气管阻塞时手术条件越好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信