Post-ESOphagectomy patients presenting for General Anesthesia INduction: A systematic review of the literature (PESO-GAIN-R).

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-16 DOI:10.4103/sja.sja_738_24
Nika Samadzadeh Tabrizi, Alexander D Shapeton, Jamel Ortoleva, Michelle Burmistova, Riley A Demos, Sridhar R Musuku, Roman Schumann
{"title":"Post-ESOphagectomy patients presenting for General Anesthesia INduction: A systematic review of the literature (PESO-GAIN-R).","authors":"Nika Samadzadeh Tabrizi, Alexander D Shapeton, Jamel Ortoleva, Michelle Burmistova, Riley A Demos, Sridhar R Musuku, Roman Schumann","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_738_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Immediately following esophagectomy, aspiration is responsible for most direct postoperative complications, largely attributed to anatomical alterations from the surgical procedure. The long-term risk of aspiration following successful esophagectomy has not been systematically investigated, and there are no guidelines for the anesthetic management of postesophagectomy patients who require elective surgeries involving general anesthesia (GA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception through January 1, 2024 to identify studies involving patients ≥90 days postesophagectomy and undergoing elective surgery unrelated to their esophagectomy status, where GA was required. Data on perioperative anesthetic management were extracted. The primary outcomes assessed were perioperative gastrointestinal and pulmonary complications. Secondary outcomes included the approach to induction of GA and author recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 4097 studies, ten studies involving 131 patients met inclusion criteria. Intraoperatively, adverse events during induction occurred in 13.0% of 131 cases, including regurgitation of gastric contents in 5.3% and pulmonary aspiration in 9.9%. The airway was managed with an endotracheal tube in 95.6%. Induction was performed in the semi-Fowler position in 92.9% and performed using the rapid sequence and standard induction techniques in 58.7% and 41.3%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who have undergone esophagectomy may remain at high risk for aspiration during GA even in the long term, necessitating enhanced vigilance in anesthetic management. We offer evidence-informed suggestions for elective induction of GA in patients with a history of successful esophagectomy to enhance safe practice for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"19 3","pages":"334-344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12240513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_738_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Immediately following esophagectomy, aspiration is responsible for most direct postoperative complications, largely attributed to anatomical alterations from the surgical procedure. The long-term risk of aspiration following successful esophagectomy has not been systematically investigated, and there are no guidelines for the anesthetic management of postesophagectomy patients who require elective surgeries involving general anesthesia (GA).

Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception through January 1, 2024 to identify studies involving patients ≥90 days postesophagectomy and undergoing elective surgery unrelated to their esophagectomy status, where GA was required. Data on perioperative anesthetic management were extracted. The primary outcomes assessed were perioperative gastrointestinal and pulmonary complications. Secondary outcomes included the approach to induction of GA and author recommendations.

Results: Of the 4097 studies, ten studies involving 131 patients met inclusion criteria. Intraoperatively, adverse events during induction occurred in 13.0% of 131 cases, including regurgitation of gastric contents in 5.3% and pulmonary aspiration in 9.9%. The airway was managed with an endotracheal tube in 95.6%. Induction was performed in the semi-Fowler position in 92.9% and performed using the rapid sequence and standard induction techniques in 58.7% and 41.3%, respectively.

Conclusions: Patients who have undergone esophagectomy may remain at high risk for aspiration during GA even in the long term, necessitating enhanced vigilance in anesthetic management. We offer evidence-informed suggestions for elective induction of GA in patients with a history of successful esophagectomy to enhance safe practice for these patients.

食管切除术后患者接受全麻诱导:文献系统综述(PESO-GAIN-R)。
目的:食管切除术后,误吸是最直接的术后并发症,主要归因于手术过程的解剖改变。食管切除术成功后误吸的长期风险还没有系统的研究,对于食管切除术后需要全麻(GA)选择性手术的患者的麻醉管理也没有指南。方法:系统地检索PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase和Web of Science,从开始到2024年1月1日,以确定涉及食管切除术后≥90天且与食管切除术状态无关的择期手术的患者,其中需要GA。提取围手术期麻醉管理数据。评估的主要结果是围手术期胃肠道和肺部并发症。次要结局包括诱导GA的方法和作者推荐。结果:在4097项研究中,有10项研究涉及131例患者符合纳入标准。术中131例患者中,诱导不良事件发生率为13.0%,其中胃内容物反流5.3%,肺误吸9.9%。95.6%的患者气管插管。92.9%采用半福勒位诱导,58.7%采用快速序列诱导,41.3%采用标准诱导。结论:行食管切除术的患者在GA过程中可能长期存在误吸的高风险,需要提高麻醉管理的警惕性。我们为有成功食管切除术史的患者提供选择性诱导GA的循证建议,以提高这些患者的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信