Hierarchy of Preferred Patient Outcomes Among Survivors of Acute Respiratory Failure.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Somnath Bose, Lena Novack, Samantha Harrison, Valerie Goodspeed, Krystal Capers, Margaret M Hayes, Victor D Dinglas, Dale M Needham, Samuel M Brown
{"title":"Hierarchy of Preferred Patient Outcomes Among Survivors of Acute Respiratory Failure.","authors":"Somnath Bose, Lena Novack, Samantha Harrison, Valerie Goodspeed, Krystal Capers, Margaret M Hayes, Victor D Dinglas, Dale M Needham, Samuel M Brown","doi":"10.1089/respcare.13083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Surviving acute respiratory failure (ARF) in the ICU is often a life-changing event. Most survivors face endure impairments across several domains, termed as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). There is limited investigation on how survivors and their caregivers perceive recovery from their own lived experiences. The objective of this study was to characterize which domains of recovery matter most to ARF survivors and their caregivers. <b>Methods:</b> A single-center, prospective observational study nested within 2 contiguous cohort studies: Addressing Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (APICS)-01 and APICS-COVID that enrolled ARF survivors who were admitted to ICU and discharged home. Survivors and caregivers were asked to prioritize following 9 domains of recovery using a custom-made survey: cognition, pain, physical function, pulmonary function, muscle/nerve function, mental health, fatigue, return to work or prior activities, and survival. These domains were chosen based on prior literature and modified based on input from a patient and family advisory council at the study site. The order of prioritization of domains of recovery was assessed at hospital discharge and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. <b>Results:</b> Forty eligible study subjects and 10 caregivers were recruited between 2019 and 2022. Mean age was 51.0 (SD 13.8) years, more than two thirds were male, and approximately one-third were non-white. Of the 9 domains surveyed, survival was consistently ranked the highest at each of the 3 time points. Cognitive recovery and physical function were ranked as the next 2 most important domains of recovery. <b>Conclusions:</b> ARF survivors who were discharged to home prioritized survival and then physical and cognitive recovery over 6 other domains. Understanding what matters most to survivors is a key step toward identifying priority areas for care in ICUs and rehabilitation after critical illness. Future studies should include survivors and caregivers from diverse backgrounds to obtain a comprehensive assessment of their perspective of recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.13083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surviving acute respiratory failure (ARF) in the ICU is often a life-changing event. Most survivors face endure impairments across several domains, termed as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). There is limited investigation on how survivors and their caregivers perceive recovery from their own lived experiences. The objective of this study was to characterize which domains of recovery matter most to ARF survivors and their caregivers. Methods: A single-center, prospective observational study nested within 2 contiguous cohort studies: Addressing Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (APICS)-01 and APICS-COVID that enrolled ARF survivors who were admitted to ICU and discharged home. Survivors and caregivers were asked to prioritize following 9 domains of recovery using a custom-made survey: cognition, pain, physical function, pulmonary function, muscle/nerve function, mental health, fatigue, return to work or prior activities, and survival. These domains were chosen based on prior literature and modified based on input from a patient and family advisory council at the study site. The order of prioritization of domains of recovery was assessed at hospital discharge and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Results: Forty eligible study subjects and 10 caregivers were recruited between 2019 and 2022. Mean age was 51.0 (SD 13.8) years, more than two thirds were male, and approximately one-third were non-white. Of the 9 domains surveyed, survival was consistently ranked the highest at each of the 3 time points. Cognitive recovery and physical function were ranked as the next 2 most important domains of recovery. Conclusions: ARF survivors who were discharged to home prioritized survival and then physical and cognitive recovery over 6 other domains. Understanding what matters most to survivors is a key step toward identifying priority areas for care in ICUs and rehabilitation after critical illness. Future studies should include survivors and caregivers from diverse backgrounds to obtain a comprehensive assessment of their perspective of recovery.

急性呼吸衰竭幸存者的首选患者结局等级。
背景:急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)在ICU存活往往是一个改变生活的事件。大多数幸存者面临着跨越几个领域的损伤,称为重症监护后综合征(PICS)。关于幸存者及其照顾者如何看待从自己的生活经历中恢复的调查有限。本研究的目的是表征哪些领域的恢复最重要的ARF幸存者和他们的照顾者。方法:一项单中心、前瞻性观察性研究,纳入两项连续队列研究:解决重症监护后综合征(APICS)-01和APICS- covid,纳入入院ICU并出院的ARF幸存者。通过一项定制的调查,要求幸存者和照顾者优先考虑以下9个康复领域:认知、疼痛、身体功能、肺功能、肌肉/神经功能、心理健康、疲劳、重返工作或之前的活动以及生存。这些领域是根据先前的文献选择的,并根据研究现场患者和家属咨询委员会的输入进行修改。在出院时以及3个月和6个月随访时评估康复领域的优先顺序。结果:在2019年至2022年期间招募了40名符合条件的研究受试者和10名护理人员。平均年龄为51.0岁(SD 13.8),超过三分之二为男性,约三分之一为非白人。在调查的9个领域中,生存率在3个时间点中的每一个都始终排名最高。认知恢复和身体功能被列为接下来两个最重要的恢复领域。结论:出院回家的ARF幸存者优先考虑生存,其次是身体和认知恢复,而不是其他6个领域。了解对幸存者最重要的是什么,这是确定重症监护室护理和危重疾病后康复优先领域的关键一步。未来的研究应该包括来自不同背景的幸存者和照顾者,以获得对他们康复观点的全面评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信