Distinguishing Subtypes of Unwitnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest by Estimate Last Seen Alive Time.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Sophia Snyder, Dalton Wesemann, Maja C Strusinska-Thayer, Jonathan Jui, Ritu Sahni, Shewit P Giovanni, Chris R Shaw, Mohamud R Daya, Joshua R Lupton
{"title":"Distinguishing Subtypes of Unwitnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest by Estimate Last Seen Alive Time.","authors":"Sophia Snyder, Dalton Wesemann, Maja C Strusinska-Thayer, Jonathan Jui, Ritu Sahni, Shewit P Giovanni, Chris R Shaw, Mohamud R Daya, Joshua R Lupton","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2522824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Approximately one-half of all out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) are unwitnessed and have a very low survival rate. Our objective was to assess if use of a bystander estimated last-seen-alive (ELSA) time could predict a subset of unwitnessed OHCA patients with outcomes resembling those with witnessed OHCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a registry-based retrospective analysis of adults presenting with emergency medical services (EMS)-treated, non-traumatic OHCA from 2018-2023, in the Portland Cardiac Arrest Epidemiologic Registry. We excluded EMS-witnessed arrests, patients with do-not-resuscitate orders and records with incomplete data. Our primary outcome was survival with a favorable neurologic outcome at hospital discharge (Cerebral Performance Category score ≤2). We compared bystander witnessed arrests to unwitnessed arrests with ELSA times <5 min, 5-10 min, 10-15 min, ≥15 min, or unknown. ELSAs were abstracted from EMS charts using bystander estimates of when the patient was last seen, with values averaged if a range was given. We used multivariable mixed effects regression analysis to adjust for potential confounding variables. In the subset of patients where no-flow time (NFT) could be calculated, using the interval from estimated time of arrest (using ELSA and 911 call time) to initial EMS cardiopulmonary resuscitation, we performed propensity score matching by NFT and potential confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2067 bystander witnessed and 2755 unwitnessed patients meeting inclusion criteria. Patients with an unwitnessed arrest and an ELSA <5 minutes had similar adjusted favorable neurologic survival (absolute difference (95% confidence interval)) relative to witnessed arrests (-1.4%, (-6.9%, 4.2%)). Compared to witnessed arrests, neurologically favorable survival was significantly lower in unwitnessed arrests with ELSA 5-10 minutes (-5.3% (-9.5%, -1.2%)), 10-15 minutes (-6.8% ((-10.7%, -2.9%)), ≥15 minutes (-9.2% ((-12.7%, -5.7%))), or unknown (-5.2% ((-7.0%, -3.4%))). In our propensity matched group by NFT and covariates, there was no differences in favorable neurologic survival for unwitnessed arrests (11.4%) and bystander witnessed arrests (10.0%, p = 0.785).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OHCA patients with unwitnessed arrests with an ELSA under 5 minutes or using ELSA to match by NFT displayed similar neurologically favorable survival as witnessed arrests. These findings suggest that the use of ELSA may help better characterize unwitnessed OHCAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2522824","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Approximately one-half of all out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) are unwitnessed and have a very low survival rate. Our objective was to assess if use of a bystander estimated last-seen-alive (ELSA) time could predict a subset of unwitnessed OHCA patients with outcomes resembling those with witnessed OHCA.

Methods: This is a registry-based retrospective analysis of adults presenting with emergency medical services (EMS)-treated, non-traumatic OHCA from 2018-2023, in the Portland Cardiac Arrest Epidemiologic Registry. We excluded EMS-witnessed arrests, patients with do-not-resuscitate orders and records with incomplete data. Our primary outcome was survival with a favorable neurologic outcome at hospital discharge (Cerebral Performance Category score ≤2). We compared bystander witnessed arrests to unwitnessed arrests with ELSA times <5 min, 5-10 min, 10-15 min, ≥15 min, or unknown. ELSAs were abstracted from EMS charts using bystander estimates of when the patient was last seen, with values averaged if a range was given. We used multivariable mixed effects regression analysis to adjust for potential confounding variables. In the subset of patients where no-flow time (NFT) could be calculated, using the interval from estimated time of arrest (using ELSA and 911 call time) to initial EMS cardiopulmonary resuscitation, we performed propensity score matching by NFT and potential confounding variables.

Results: There were 2067 bystander witnessed and 2755 unwitnessed patients meeting inclusion criteria. Patients with an unwitnessed arrest and an ELSA <5 minutes had similar adjusted favorable neurologic survival (absolute difference (95% confidence interval)) relative to witnessed arrests (-1.4%, (-6.9%, 4.2%)). Compared to witnessed arrests, neurologically favorable survival was significantly lower in unwitnessed arrests with ELSA 5-10 minutes (-5.3% (-9.5%, -1.2%)), 10-15 minutes (-6.8% ((-10.7%, -2.9%)), ≥15 minutes (-9.2% ((-12.7%, -5.7%))), or unknown (-5.2% ((-7.0%, -3.4%))). In our propensity matched group by NFT and covariates, there was no differences in favorable neurologic survival for unwitnessed arrests (11.4%) and bystander witnessed arrests (10.0%, p = 0.785).

Conclusions: OHCA patients with unwitnessed arrests with an ELSA under 5 minutes or using ELSA to match by NFT displayed similar neurologically favorable survival as witnessed arrests. These findings suggest that the use of ELSA may help better characterize unwitnessed OHCAs.

通过估计最后一次见到的存活时间来区分非目击院外心脏骤停亚型。
目的:大约一半的院外心脏骤停(OHCA)是未被发现的,生存率很低。我们的目的是评估使用旁观者估计的最后存活时间(ELSA)是否可以预测一部分未亲眼目睹的OHCA患者的预后与亲眼目睹的OHCA患者相似。方法:这是一项基于登记的回顾性分析,对波特兰心脏骤停流行病学登记处2018-2023年急诊医疗服务(EMS)治疗的非创伤性OHCA成人进行回顾性分析。我们排除了ems目击的逮捕,有不复苏命令的患者和数据不完整的记录。我们的主要终点是出院时神经系统预后良好的生存期(脑功能分类评分≤2)。我们比较了旁观者目击逮捕和非目击者逮捕与ELSA次数。结果:有2067名旁观者目击和2755名非目击者患者符合纳入标准。结论:ELSA小于5分钟或使用ELSA与NFT匹配的OHCA患者的ELSA在神经学上表现出与目视骤停相似的有利生存。这些发现表明,ELSA的使用可能有助于更好地表征未见过的ohca。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信