{"title":"Straining to define a healthy microbiome.","authors":"Anna M Seekatz","doi":"10.1128/msphere.00797-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2020, I wrote an mSphere of Influence commentary on two studies that shaped my research perspective on the human gut microbiome (McNulty et al., Sci Transl Med 3:106ra106, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3002701; Hamilton et al., Gut Microbes 4:125, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.23571). The microbiome field has continued to progress since the publication of these studies over 10 years ago, emerging as a considerable factor in almost all areas focused on disease development. My previous commentary highlighted two areas that piqued my interest early on in my career: (i) that the extant microbial community should be considered when proposing to manipulate the microbiota, such as via probiotics or fecal microbiota transplantation, and (ii) that realized (i.e., transcribed) functional changes of the microbiota may occur independent of changes in its composition. Since writing that commentary, two microbiota-based therapeutics for the treatment of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection have been approved, highlighting the potential success of using the microbiota to treat or prevent disease. Despite these wins and ever-growing evidence of the importance of the microbiome in managing our health, translating mechanistic studies into therapeutic value has been slower. In this minireview, I expand upon two large questions that would increase our ability to translate the microbiome into therapies, highlighting both historical and recent progress.</p>","PeriodicalId":19052,"journal":{"name":"mSphere","volume":" ","pages":"e0079724"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mSphere","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00797-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In 2020, I wrote an mSphere of Influence commentary on two studies that shaped my research perspective on the human gut microbiome (McNulty et al., Sci Transl Med 3:106ra106, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3002701; Hamilton et al., Gut Microbes 4:125, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.23571). The microbiome field has continued to progress since the publication of these studies over 10 years ago, emerging as a considerable factor in almost all areas focused on disease development. My previous commentary highlighted two areas that piqued my interest early on in my career: (i) that the extant microbial community should be considered when proposing to manipulate the microbiota, such as via probiotics or fecal microbiota transplantation, and (ii) that realized (i.e., transcribed) functional changes of the microbiota may occur independent of changes in its composition. Since writing that commentary, two microbiota-based therapeutics for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection have been approved, highlighting the potential success of using the microbiota to treat or prevent disease. Despite these wins and ever-growing evidence of the importance of the microbiome in managing our health, translating mechanistic studies into therapeutic value has been slower. In this minireview, I expand upon two large questions that would increase our ability to translate the microbiome into therapies, highlighting both historical and recent progress.
2020年,我写了一篇关于两项研究的影响评论,这些研究塑造了我对人类肠道微生物组的研究视角(McNulty等人,Sci Transl Med 3:106ra106, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3002701;Hamilton et al.,肠道微生物4:125,2013,https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.23571)。自10多年前这些研究发表以来,微生物组领域不断取得进展,几乎在所有关注疾病发展的领域都成为一个重要因素。我之前的评论强调了在我职业生涯早期引起我兴趣的两个领域:(i)在提出操纵微生物群时应考虑现有的微生物群落,例如通过益生菌或粪便微生物群移植,以及(ii)实现(即转录)微生物群的功能变化可能独立于其组成的变化而发生。自撰写该评论以来,已有两种基于微生物群的治疗艰难梭菌感染的药物获得批准,这突显了利用微生物群治疗或预防疾病的潜在成功。尽管取得了这些胜利,并且越来越多的证据表明微生物组在管理我们的健康方面的重要性,但将机制研究转化为治疗价值的速度一直较慢。在这篇小型综述中,我将扩展两个大问题,这些问题将提高我们将微生物组转化为治疗方法的能力,并强调历史和最近的进展。
期刊介绍:
mSphere™ is a multi-disciplinary open-access journal that will focus on rapid publication of fundamental contributions to our understanding of microbiology. Its scope will reflect the immense range of fields within the microbial sciences, creating new opportunities for researchers to share findings that are transforming our understanding of human health and disease, ecosystems, neuroscience, agriculture, energy production, climate change, evolution, biogeochemical cycling, and food and drug production. Submissions will be encouraged of all high-quality work that makes fundamental contributions to our understanding of microbiology. mSphere™ will provide streamlined decisions, while carrying on ASM''s tradition for rigorous peer review.