Internal fixation through posterolateral approach versus Ilizarov external fixation for treatment of aseptic distal tibia nonunion: a comparative analysis.

Q1 Medicine
S Cerbasi, G Di Sante, N Rani, N Del Piccolo, C Stagni, A Maresca, P Vitale, D Dallari, R Pascarella
{"title":"Internal fixation through posterolateral approach versus Ilizarov external fixation for treatment of aseptic distal tibia nonunion: a comparative analysis.","authors":"S Cerbasi, G Di Sante, N Rani, N Del Piccolo, C Stagni, A Maresca, P Vitale, D Dallari, R Pascarella","doi":"10.1007/s12306-025-00911-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Distal tibia nonunion poses a serious therapeutic challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Bone loss and soft tissue damage is relatively common. The aim of this study was to compare the healing rate and related functional outcomes between two retrospective series of distal tibia nonunion cases treated with internal fixation via the posterolateral approach and those managed with Ilizarov external fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 47 affected by distal tibia nonunion. The subjects had undergone internal fixation with inter-tibiofibular graft through the posterolateral approach (Group A, n = 24) and Ilizarov method associated or not with bone transport procedures and osteotomies (Group B, n = 23). Results were assessed at a minimum 24 months after surgery. Consolidation rate, radiographic healing time of nonunion, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), the short form health survey (SF-12) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores (pain, ability to work and treatment satisfaction) were compared between the groups. Complications and reoperations were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nonunion healing rate was 75% (18/24) in the group A and 91% in the group B (21/23)(p = 0.001). Consolidation was observed, on average, 5.7 months after surgery (range, 4-9) in the group A and 10.7 months in the B group (range, 5-24) (p = 0.001). All patients recovered have had good functional outcomes with no significant differences between the groups. At final follow-up, AOFAS scores in the A group were 74 (range 52-94), while in the B group it was 79 (range 57-100). Group A showed a better perception of mental health status (SF-12-MCS 46 vs. 45, p = 0.36) and a better satisfaction with the treatment received, but a worse perception of their physical health status (SF-12-PCS 49 vs. 50, p = 0.52) with a lower mean score on working ability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distal tibial nonunion can be successfully treated with the posterolateral approach, or external Ilizarov fixation. There are not significative outcomes differences when patients undergoing internal or external fixation. Although healing times are faster with internal fixation via the posterolateral approach, healing rates are higher with the Ilizarov method.</p>","PeriodicalId":18875,"journal":{"name":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-025-00911-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Distal tibia nonunion poses a serious therapeutic challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Bone loss and soft tissue damage is relatively common. The aim of this study was to compare the healing rate and related functional outcomes between two retrospective series of distal tibia nonunion cases treated with internal fixation via the posterolateral approach and those managed with Ilizarov external fixation.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 47 affected by distal tibia nonunion. The subjects had undergone internal fixation with inter-tibiofibular graft through the posterolateral approach (Group A, n = 24) and Ilizarov method associated or not with bone transport procedures and osteotomies (Group B, n = 23). Results were assessed at a minimum 24 months after surgery. Consolidation rate, radiographic healing time of nonunion, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), the short form health survey (SF-12) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores (pain, ability to work and treatment satisfaction) were compared between the groups. Complications and reoperations were also recorded.

Results: The nonunion healing rate was 75% (18/24) in the group A and 91% in the group B (21/23)(p = 0.001). Consolidation was observed, on average, 5.7 months after surgery (range, 4-9) in the group A and 10.7 months in the B group (range, 5-24) (p = 0.001). All patients recovered have had good functional outcomes with no significant differences between the groups. At final follow-up, AOFAS scores in the A group were 74 (range 52-94), while in the B group it was 79 (range 57-100). Group A showed a better perception of mental health status (SF-12-MCS 46 vs. 45, p = 0.36) and a better satisfaction with the treatment received, but a worse perception of their physical health status (SF-12-PCS 49 vs. 50, p = 0.52) with a lower mean score on working ability.

Conclusion: Distal tibial nonunion can be successfully treated with the posterolateral approach, or external Ilizarov fixation. There are not significative outcomes differences when patients undergoing internal or external fixation. Although healing times are faster with internal fixation via the posterolateral approach, healing rates are higher with the Ilizarov method.

后外侧入路内固定与Ilizarov外固定治疗无菌性胫骨远端骨不连的比较分析。
目的:胫骨远端骨不连是骨科医生面临的一个严重的治疗挑战。骨质流失和软组织损伤是相对常见的。本研究的目的是比较两个回顾性系列胫骨远端骨不连病例的愈合率和相关功能结果,这些病例采用后外侧入路内固定治疗和Ilizarov外固定治疗。方法:回顾性队列研究纳入47例胫骨远端骨不连患者。受试者通过后外侧入路行胫腓骨间移植物内固定(A组,n = 24)和Ilizarov方法(B组,n = 23)。结果在术后至少24个月进行评估。比较两组患者的巩固率、骨不连影像学愈合时间、美国骨科足踝学会(AOFAS)评分、SF-12评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分(疼痛、工作能力和治疗满意度)。同时记录并发症及再手术情况。结果:A组骨不愈合率为75% (18/24),B组为91% (21/23)(p = 0.001)。A组平均术后5.7个月(范围4-9),B组平均术后10.7个月(范围5-24)(p = 0.001)。所有恢复的患者都有良好的功能结局,组间无显著差异。最终随访时,A组患者AOFAS评分为74分(52-94分),B组患者AOFAS评分为79分(57-100分)。A组患者对心理健康状况的感知较好(SF-12-MCS 46比45,p = 0.36),对所接受治疗的满意度较高,但对身体健康状况的感知较差(SF-12-PCS 49比50,p = 0.52),工作能力平均得分较低。结论:胫骨远端骨不连可通过后外侧入路或Ilizarov外固定成功治疗。患者接受内固定或外固定时,结果无显著差异。虽然通过后外侧入路内固定的愈合时间更快,但Ilizarov方法的愈合率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Surgery – Formerly La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento, founded in 1917 at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, is a peer-reviewed journal published three times a year. The journal provides up-to-date information to clinicians and scientists through the publication of original papers, reviews, case reports, and brief communications dealing with the pathogenesis and treatment of orthopaedic conditions.An electronic version is also available at http://www.springerlink.com.The journal is open for publication of supplements and for publishing abstracts of scientific meetings; conditions can be obtained from the Editors-in-Chief or the Publisher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信