The Dose-Response Relationship of Aerobic Exercise on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Blake E G Collins, Brett A Gordon, Daniel W T Wundersitz, David Carey, Michael I C Kingsley
{"title":"The Dose-Response Relationship of Aerobic Exercise on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.","authors":"Blake E G Collins, Brett A Gordon, Daniel W T Wundersitz, David Carey, Michael I C Kingsley","doi":"10.1097/HCR.0000000000000963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the incremental dose-response effect of aerobic exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs (ExCRP) on cardiorespiratory fitness in comparison to non-exercise controls among people with coronary heart disease (CHD).</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and SPORTDiscus were searched from January 1, 2000 until December 4, 2023. Articles were eligible for selection if they satisfied the following criteria: randomized controlled studies assessing change in cardiorespiratory fitness among people with CHD in non-exercise and aerobic intervention groups, established peak oxygen uptake via cardiopulmonary exercise test, minimum of 4-week program duration, and reported frequency, intensity, and duration of prescribed exercise. The study was prospectively registered (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021274924).</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Thirty-three studies, including 1901 participants were included in the continuous dose-analysis. A significant difference in cardiorespiratory fitness was identified between ExCRP and non-exercise control that favored exercise by 3.4 (3.0-3.9) mL·kg -1 ·min -1 . No difference existed between interval and continuous training when matched for exercise dose. Dose-response analyses identified a significant increase in cardiorespiratory fitness (3.4 [2.9-5.5] mL·kg -1 ·min -1 ) associated with program completion, with no additional benefit related to increased exercise dose. When compared to non-exercise control, participating in ExCRP with a minimum total program intervention dose of 2194 metabolic equivalent minutes significantly improves cardiorespiratory fitness. However, no additional benefit was discernible from higher exercise doses. Although the recommended dose for ExCRP augments medical treatment and is sufficient to improve cardiorespiratory fitness, it is likely that the narrow range in prescribed exercise dose and variations in the fidelity of exercise interventions limit interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000963","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the incremental dose-response effect of aerobic exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs (ExCRP) on cardiorespiratory fitness in comparison to non-exercise controls among people with coronary heart disease (CHD).

Review methods: Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and SPORTDiscus were searched from January 1, 2000 until December 4, 2023. Articles were eligible for selection if they satisfied the following criteria: randomized controlled studies assessing change in cardiorespiratory fitness among people with CHD in non-exercise and aerobic intervention groups, established peak oxygen uptake via cardiopulmonary exercise test, minimum of 4-week program duration, and reported frequency, intensity, and duration of prescribed exercise. The study was prospectively registered (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021274924).

Summary: Thirty-three studies, including 1901 participants were included in the continuous dose-analysis. A significant difference in cardiorespiratory fitness was identified between ExCRP and non-exercise control that favored exercise by 3.4 (3.0-3.9) mL·kg -1 ·min -1 . No difference existed between interval and continuous training when matched for exercise dose. Dose-response analyses identified a significant increase in cardiorespiratory fitness (3.4 [2.9-5.5] mL·kg -1 ·min -1 ) associated with program completion, with no additional benefit related to increased exercise dose. When compared to non-exercise control, participating in ExCRP with a minimum total program intervention dose of 2194 metabolic equivalent minutes significantly improves cardiorespiratory fitness. However, no additional benefit was discernible from higher exercise doses. Although the recommended dose for ExCRP augments medical treatment and is sufficient to improve cardiorespiratory fitness, it is likely that the narrow range in prescribed exercise dose and variations in the fidelity of exercise interventions limit interpretation.

有氧运动对心脏康复患者心肺健康的量效关系:一项系统综述和meta分析。
目的:探讨以有氧运动为基础的心脏康复计划(ExCRP)对冠心病(CHD)患者心肺健康的增量量效效应,并与非运动对照组进行比较。综述方法:检索自2000年1月1日至2023年12月4日的Medline、CINAHL、Cochrane、SCOPUS和SPORTDiscus。符合以下标准的文章才有资格入选:随机对照研究评估非运动和有氧干预组冠心病患者心肺健康的变化,通过心肺运动试验建立峰值摄氧量,至少4周的计划持续时间,报告规定运动的频率、强度和持续时间。该研究已前瞻性注册(PROSPERO ID: CRD42021274924)。总结:33项研究,包括1901名参与者被纳入连续剂量分析。ExCRP与非运动对照组在心肺功能方面存在显著差异,前者倾向于运动3.4 (3.0-3.9)mL·kg -1·min -1。当运动剂量匹配时,间歇训练和连续训练之间没有差异。剂量-反应分析发现,与项目完成相关的心肺适能显著增加(3.4 [2.9-5.5]mL·kg -1·min -1),与增加运动剂量无关。与非运动对照组相比,最小总计划干预剂量为2194代谢当量分钟的ExCRP显著改善了心肺功能。然而,更高的运动剂量并没有带来额外的好处。虽然ExCRP的推荐剂量增加了医学治疗,足以改善心肺健康,但很可能是规定的运动剂量范围狭窄和运动干预的保真度变化限制了解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
34.20%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JCRP was the first, and remains the only, professional journal dedicated to improving multidisciplinary clinical practice and expanding research evidence specific to both cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation. This includes exercise testing and prescription, behavioral medicine, and cardiopulmonary risk factor management. In 2007, JCRP expanded its scope to include primary prevention of cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. JCRP publishes scientific and clinical peer-reviewed Original Investigations, Reviews, and Brief or Case Reports focused on the causes, prevention, and treatment of individuals with cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases in both a print and online-only format. Editorial features include Editorials, Invited Commentaries, Literature Updates, and Clinically-relevant Topical Updates. JCRP is the official Journal of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信