Did universal masking during the COVID-19 pandemic reduce MRSA and MSSA acquisition in the NICU?

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Meaghan Neary, Kathleen Quan, Thomas Tjoa, Cassiana E Bittencourt, Susan S Huang, Cherry Uy
{"title":"Did universal masking during the COVID-19 pandemic reduce MRSA and MSSA acquisition in the NICU?","authors":"Meaghan Neary, Kathleen Quan, Thomas Tjoa, Cassiana E Bittencourt, Susan S Huang, Cherry Uy","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.10209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether universal masking during the COVID-19 pandemic reduced neonatal acquisition of <i>S. aureus</i>.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of neonates admitted to a level three regional NICU for three years before and after implementation of universal masking for the COVID-19 pandemic. Multivariable proportional hazards regression models evaluated the effect of masking on time-to-acquisition of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive <i>S. aureus</i> (MRSA and MSSA) while adjusting for fixed and time-varying neonatal characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 2,728 neonates, 1,446 pre-pandemic and 1,282 post-pandemic; 84.9% were inborn, with mean gestational age of 34 weeks and 6 days (SD = 4.2) and mean birthweight of 2,500 grams (SD = 975). The mean number of screening cultures per neonate was 3.07 (SD = 3.31). When adjusting for covariates, universal masking was associated with decreased acquisition of MRSA (hazard ratio =0.43 (95% CI: 0.19-0.99), <i>p</i> = 0.04) but not MSSA (HR = 1.27 (95% CI: 00.87-1.85), <i>p</i> = 0.21). Among covariates, airway devices and maternal <i>S. aureus</i> status were associated with <i>S. aureus</i> acquisition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Universal masking decreased the rate of NICU MRSA acquisition by 60% while MSSA acquisition was unchanged. Masking may reduce MRSA spread via colonized healthcare personnel while MSSA may be more likely to be acquired from parental skin-to-skin contact and was thus unaffected by masking.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10209","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess whether universal masking during the COVID-19 pandemic reduced neonatal acquisition of S. aureus.

Study design: We performed a retrospective cohort study of neonates admitted to a level three regional NICU for three years before and after implementation of universal masking for the COVID-19 pandemic. Multivariable proportional hazards regression models evaluated the effect of masking on time-to-acquisition of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MRSA and MSSA) while adjusting for fixed and time-varying neonatal characteristics.

Results: We analyzed 2,728 neonates, 1,446 pre-pandemic and 1,282 post-pandemic; 84.9% were inborn, with mean gestational age of 34 weeks and 6 days (SD = 4.2) and mean birthweight of 2,500 grams (SD = 975). The mean number of screening cultures per neonate was 3.07 (SD = 3.31). When adjusting for covariates, universal masking was associated with decreased acquisition of MRSA (hazard ratio =0.43 (95% CI: 0.19-0.99), p = 0.04) but not MSSA (HR = 1.27 (95% CI: 00.87-1.85), p = 0.21). Among covariates, airway devices and maternal S. aureus status were associated with S. aureus acquisition.

Conclusions: Universal masking decreased the rate of NICU MRSA acquisition by 60% while MSSA acquisition was unchanged. Masking may reduce MRSA spread via colonized healthcare personnel while MSSA may be more likely to be acquired from parental skin-to-skin contact and was thus unaffected by masking.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

COVID-19大流行期间的普遍遮盖是否减少了NICU中MRSA和MSSA的获得?
目的:评估COVID-19大流行期间的普遍掩蔽是否减少了新生儿金黄色葡萄球菌的获得。研究设计:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是在实施COVID-19大流行普遍掩蔽前后三年入住三级区域新生儿重症监护病房的新生儿。多变量比例风险回归模型评估了掩盖对甲氧西林耐药和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA和MSSA)获得时间的影响,同时调整了固定和时变的新生儿特征。结果:我们分析了2728名新生儿,1446名大流行前和1282名大流行后;84.9%为新生儿,平均胎龄34周6天(SD = 4.2),平均出生体重2500克(SD = 975)。每个新生儿平均筛选培养数为3.07个(SD = 3.31)。当调整协变量时,普遍掩蔽与MRSA获得减少相关(风险比=0.43 (95% CI: 0.19-0.99), p = 0.04),但与MSSA无关(风险比= 1.27 (95% CI: 00.87-1.85), p = 0.21)。在协变量中,气道设备和母体金黄色葡萄球菌状态与金黄色葡萄球菌获得相关。结论:普遍遮盖使NICU MRSA获得率降低60%,而MSSA获得率不变。掩蔽可以减少MRSA通过定植的卫生保健人员传播,而MSSA可能更容易通过父母皮肤接触获得,因此不受掩蔽的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信