Anterior quadratus lumborum block is superior to erector spinae plane block for analgesia after renal transplantation: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yi An, Lixia Li, Zhongjia Li, Fei Lan, Tianlong Wang, Tongwen Ou, Chuanyu Liang, Pei Wang, Xuefei Jia, Hongyi Song, Ke Cui, Huifang Luo, Lei Zhao
{"title":"Anterior quadratus lumborum block is superior to erector spinae plane block for analgesia after renal transplantation: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yi An, Lixia Li, Zhongjia Li, Fei Lan, Tianlong Wang, Tongwen Ou, Chuanyu Liang, Pei Wang, Xuefei Jia, Hongyi Song, Ke Cui, Huifang Luo, Lei Zhao","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03209-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical evidence revealed patients suffered from moderate to severe pain after renal transplantation. Both quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) are effective strategies in perioperative analgesia. This trial aims to detect whether truncal blocks are utility in alleviating postoperative pain after renal transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-two patients underwent renal transplantation were recruited and randomized to QLB group, ESPB group and control group (C group). Patients in QLB or ESPB group received 0.5% ropivacaine 30 mL for single injection before surgery respectively and patients in C group did not receive any local anesthetic injection before general anesthesia induction. Postoperative pain intensity was evaluated at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery in the present study. Intraoperative medication and postoperative complications were also recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of moderate to severe pain in the first 24 h when moving was lowest in the QLB group (41.9% in QLB group vs. 83.9% in ESPB group vs. 96.7% in C group, P < 0.001). Pain intensity score (NRS) in the QLB group was significantly improved at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 h after surgery (P < 0.05). Area under curve (AUCs) of NRS scores were significantly lower in the QLB group than in the ESPB group and C group (P < 0.001). We also observed a reduction of remifentanil consumption in the QLB group than in either the ESPB or C groups (P = 0.008 and P < 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Quadratus lumborum block before surgery more effectively suppressed pain after renal transplantation relative to erector spinae plane block.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered on October 2, 2020. ChiCTR2000038803.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12243212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03209-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical evidence revealed patients suffered from moderate to severe pain after renal transplantation. Both quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) are effective strategies in perioperative analgesia. This trial aims to detect whether truncal blocks are utility in alleviating postoperative pain after renal transplantation.

Methods: Ninety-two patients underwent renal transplantation were recruited and randomized to QLB group, ESPB group and control group (C group). Patients in QLB or ESPB group received 0.5% ropivacaine 30 mL for single injection before surgery respectively and patients in C group did not receive any local anesthetic injection before general anesthesia induction. Postoperative pain intensity was evaluated at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery in the present study. Intraoperative medication and postoperative complications were also recorded and analyzed.

Results: The proportion of moderate to severe pain in the first 24 h when moving was lowest in the QLB group (41.9% in QLB group vs. 83.9% in ESPB group vs. 96.7% in C group, P < 0.001). Pain intensity score (NRS) in the QLB group was significantly improved at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 h after surgery (P < 0.05). Area under curve (AUCs) of NRS scores were significantly lower in the QLB group than in the ESPB group and C group (P < 0.001). We also observed a reduction of remifentanil consumption in the QLB group than in either the ESPB or C groups (P = 0.008 and P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions: Quadratus lumborum block before surgery more effectively suppressed pain after renal transplantation relative to erector spinae plane block.

Trial registration: This study was registered on October 2, 2020. ChiCTR2000038803.

前腰方肌阻滞优于竖脊肌平面阻滞用于肾移植术后镇痛:一项随机对照试验。
背景:临床证据显示肾移植术后患者存在中度至重度疼痛。腰方肌阻滞(QLB)和竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)是围手术期镇痛的有效策略。本试验旨在检测截骨阻滞在减轻肾移植术后疼痛方面是否有效。方法:将92例肾移植患者随机分为QLB组、ESPB组和对照组(C组)。QLB组和ESPB组患者术前分别给予0.5%罗哌卡因30 mL单次注射,C组患者在全麻诱导前未进行局麻注射。本研究分别于术后0、2、4、6、8、12、24和48 h评估术后疼痛强度。记录并分析术中用药及术后并发症。结果:QLB组运动前24 h出现中重度疼痛的比例最低(QLB组为41.9%,ESPB组为83.9%,C组为96.7%)。结论:术前腰方肌阻滞比竖脊肌平面阻滞更能有效抑制肾移植术后疼痛。试验注册:本研究于2020年10月2日注册。ChiCTR2000038803。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信