Comparison of Nasal and Oropharyngeal Bleeding in Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/anrp/7797828
Ayman Mohamady Eldemrdash, Mohamed A Alazhary, Zaher Zaki Zaher, Tarek S Hemaida, Mohammed Essam Yahia, Soudy S Hammad
{"title":"Comparison of Nasal and Oropharyngeal Bleeding in Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ayman Mohamady Eldemrdash, Mohamed A Alazhary, Zaher Zaki Zaher, Tarek S Hemaida, Mohammed Essam Yahia, Soudy S Hammad","doi":"10.1155/anrp/7797828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Nasotracheal intubation (NTI) is commonly used in maxillofacial trauma but carries a high risk of bleeding and airway complications, particularly with direct laryngoscopy (DL). Video laryngoscopy (VL) provides better glottic visualization and may reduce airway trauma. This study compares VL and DL for NTI in maxillofacial trauma patients, focusing on bleeding severity, intubation efficiency, and complications. <b>Methods:</b> This randomized controlled trial included 64 patients undergoing NTI for maxillofacial trauma, randomly assigned to VL or DL. The primary outcome was nasal and oropharyngeal bleeding severity, assessed using Fromme's scale. Secondary outcomes included first-pass success rate, intubation time, need for adjunctive maneuvers (Magill forceps and cervical spine extension), and intubation-related complications. All intubations were performed under general anesthesia following standardized airway preparation. <b>Results:</b> VL resulted in significantly lower nasal and oropharyngeal bleeding severity, with no bleeding (score 0) observed in 43.8% of the VL patients versus 12.5% of the DL group (<i>p</i>=0.005). VL also resulted in shorter intubation times (51.9 ± 7.9 s vs. 58.1 ± 8.7 s; <i>p</i>=0.003). The need for adjunctive maneuvers was significantly lower in the VL group (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and severe complications such as fractured teeth or deep lip injuries occurred more frequently in the DL group (<i>p</i>=0.02). The first-pass success rate was higher in the VL group (96.9%) than in the DL group (78.1%) though the difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i>=0.058). <b>Conclusion:</b> VL demonstrated superior intubation efficiency and reduced bleeding severity compared with DL in maxillofacial trauma patients. Given its safety advantages and reduced need for adjuncts, VL appears to be a preferable technique for NTI in maxillofacial trauma though further multicenter studies are ensured. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06386757.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2025 ","pages":"7797828"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12245500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/anrp/7797828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nasotracheal intubation (NTI) is commonly used in maxillofacial trauma but carries a high risk of bleeding and airway complications, particularly with direct laryngoscopy (DL). Video laryngoscopy (VL) provides better glottic visualization and may reduce airway trauma. This study compares VL and DL for NTI in maxillofacial trauma patients, focusing on bleeding severity, intubation efficiency, and complications. Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 64 patients undergoing NTI for maxillofacial trauma, randomly assigned to VL or DL. The primary outcome was nasal and oropharyngeal bleeding severity, assessed using Fromme's scale. Secondary outcomes included first-pass success rate, intubation time, need for adjunctive maneuvers (Magill forceps and cervical spine extension), and intubation-related complications. All intubations were performed under general anesthesia following standardized airway preparation. Results: VL resulted in significantly lower nasal and oropharyngeal bleeding severity, with no bleeding (score 0) observed in 43.8% of the VL patients versus 12.5% of the DL group (p=0.005). VL also resulted in shorter intubation times (51.9 ± 7.9 s vs. 58.1 ± 8.7 s; p=0.003). The need for adjunctive maneuvers was significantly lower in the VL group (p < 0.001), and severe complications such as fractured teeth or deep lip injuries occurred more frequently in the DL group (p=0.02). The first-pass success rate was higher in the VL group (96.9%) than in the DL group (78.1%) though the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.058). Conclusion: VL demonstrated superior intubation efficiency and reduced bleeding severity compared with DL in maxillofacial trauma patients. Given its safety advantages and reduced need for adjuncts, VL appears to be a preferable technique for NTI in maxillofacial trauma though further multicenter studies are ensured. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06386757.

颌面部外伤鼻气管插管中视频喉镜与直接喉镜下鼻部和口咽出血的比较:一项随机对照试验。
背景:鼻气管插管(NTI)常用于颌面部外伤,但有出血和气道并发症的高风险,特别是直接喉镜检查(DL)。视频喉镜(VL)提供了更好的声门可视化,可以减少气道创伤。本研究比较了VL和DL对颌面部创伤患者NTI的治疗效果,重点关注出血严重程度、插管效率和并发症。方法:本随机对照试验纳入64例颌面部外伤行NTI治疗的患者,随机分为VL组和DL组。主要终点是鼻和口咽出血严重程度,使用Fromme量表进行评估。次要结果包括首次通过成功率、插管时间、辅助操作(Magill钳和颈椎伸展)的需要以及插管相关并发症。所有插管均在全身麻醉下进行,并进行标准化气道准备。结果:VL导致鼻部和口咽出血严重程度明显降低,43.8%的VL患者无出血(0分),而DL组为12.5% (p=0.005)。VL也缩短了插管时间(51.9±7.9 s vs 58.1±8.7 s);p = 0.003)。VL组对辅助操作的需求明显降低(p < 0.001),而严重并发症如牙断裂或深唇损伤在DL组发生的频率更高(p=0.02)。VL组一次通过率(96.9%)高于DL组(78.1%),但差异无统计学意义(p=0.058)。结论:在颌面部外伤患者中,VL插管比DL插管效果好,出血严重程度低。鉴于其安全优势和减少对辅助工具的需求,VL似乎是颌面部创伤NTI的首选技术,但需要进一步的多中心研究。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06386757。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信