Prehospital CPR for Traumatic Arrest: Can Prehospital Variables Help Identify Futile Transport?

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
American Surgeon Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1177/00031348251359121
Lorena Garcia, Hye Kwang E Kim, Amy H Kaji, Jessica A Keeley, Alexander C Schwed
{"title":"Prehospital CPR for Traumatic Arrest: Can Prehospital Variables Help Identify Futile Transport?","authors":"Lorena Garcia, Hye Kwang E Kim, Amy H Kaji, Jessica A Keeley, Alexander C Schwed","doi":"10.1177/00031348251359121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resuscitative efforts (RE) for patients suffering cardiac arrest following trauma require significant prehospital (PH) and hospital resources. Patients who are transported and undergo immediate termination of resuscitative efforts (ITRE) and declared dead on arrival (DOA) may represent a population for whom improved triage can conserve hospital resources. <b>Methods:</b> We sought to identify PH variables associated with DOA/ITRE. 405 trauma patients who had PHCPR from 2014 to 2023 at a Level 1 trauma center were included. Clinical variables analyzed included demographics, mechanism of injury (MOI), PHRE, and hospital RE. The primary outcome of interest was DOA/ITRE. <b>Results:</b> Most patients were male (80.5%), with median age 35, (IQR [25-50]), suffered a penetrating MOI (56.5%), and were severely injured (ISS 34, IQR [25-75]). 102 (25.2%) patients had DOA/ITRE; they tended to be older (41.5 [29-53] vs. 32 [24-47], <i>P</i> = 0.01), were more likely to have a blunt MOIs (52/176 patients (29.6%) vs 50/229 patients (21.8%), <i>P</i> = 0.007), and less likely to have PH interventions (30.3% vs. 69.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.004). When stratified by MOI, patients with penetrating injuries spent a significantly shorter amount of time in the ED (6.3 vs 12.4 min, <i>P</i> <0.001), while in those with blunt injuries did not (10.6 vs 12.5 min, <i>P</i> = 0.3). <b>Discussion:</b> More than 25% of transported patients following traumatic arrest undergo DOA/ITRE. These patients were more likely to have a blunt MOI, older age, and fewer PH interventions. Improved triage of patients in the field may help conserve PH and hospital resources for patients more likely to benefit from transport.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"1792-1797"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251359121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resuscitative efforts (RE) for patients suffering cardiac arrest following trauma require significant prehospital (PH) and hospital resources. Patients who are transported and undergo immediate termination of resuscitative efforts (ITRE) and declared dead on arrival (DOA) may represent a population for whom improved triage can conserve hospital resources. Methods: We sought to identify PH variables associated with DOA/ITRE. 405 trauma patients who had PHCPR from 2014 to 2023 at a Level 1 trauma center were included. Clinical variables analyzed included demographics, mechanism of injury (MOI), PHRE, and hospital RE. The primary outcome of interest was DOA/ITRE. Results: Most patients were male (80.5%), with median age 35, (IQR [25-50]), suffered a penetrating MOI (56.5%), and were severely injured (ISS 34, IQR [25-75]). 102 (25.2%) patients had DOA/ITRE; they tended to be older (41.5 [29-53] vs. 32 [24-47], P = 0.01), were more likely to have a blunt MOIs (52/176 patients (29.6%) vs 50/229 patients (21.8%), P = 0.007), and less likely to have PH interventions (30.3% vs. 69.7%, P = 0.004). When stratified by MOI, patients with penetrating injuries spent a significantly shorter amount of time in the ED (6.3 vs 12.4 min, P <0.001), while in those with blunt injuries did not (10.6 vs 12.5 min, P = 0.3). Discussion: More than 25% of transported patients following traumatic arrest undergo DOA/ITRE. These patients were more likely to have a blunt MOI, older age, and fewer PH interventions. Improved triage of patients in the field may help conserve PH and hospital resources for patients more likely to benefit from transport.

院前心肺复苏术治疗创伤性骤停:院前变量能否帮助识别无效转运?
创伤后心脏骤停患者的复苏努力(RE)需要大量院前(PH)和医院资源。在运送过程中立即停止复苏并在抵达时宣布死亡的患者可能代表着这样一群人,对他们来说,改进分诊可以节省医院资源。方法:我们试图确定与DOA/ITRE相关的PH变量。纳入了2014年至2023年在一级创伤中心接受PHCPR的405例创伤患者。分析的临床变量包括人口统计学、损伤机制(MOI)、PHRE和医院RE。主要关注的结局是DOA/ITRE。结果:大多数患者为男性(80.5%),中位年龄35岁(IQR[25-50]),发生穿透性MOI(56.5%),严重损伤(ISS 34, IQR[25-75])。102例(25.2%)患者有DOA/ITRE;他们往往年龄较大(41.5例[29-53]对32例[24-47],P = 0.01), moi钝化的可能性更大(52/176例(29.6%)对50/229例(21.8%),P = 0.007), PH干预的可能性更小(30.3%对69.7%,P = 0.004)。当采用MOI分层时,穿透性损伤患者在急诊科的时间明显缩短(6.3 vs 12.4 min, P P = 0.3)。讨论:超过25%的外伤性骤停患者接受DOA/ITRE。这些患者更可能有钝性MOI,年龄较大,PH干预较少。在现场对患者进行更好的分诊可能有助于为更有可能从运输中受益的患者节省PH值和医院资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信