Gillian Sheppard, Lori Stolz, Jeremy S Boyd, Martin Pusic, Jessica Baez, Patrick Minges, Matthew Swarm, Megan Hilbert, Marisa O'Brien, Katie Harris, Catherine Varner, Constance LeBlanc, Kathy Boutis
{"title":"First Trimester Point of Care Ultrasound: Imaging Features and Review Behaviors Associated With Diagnostic Accuracy.","authors":"Gillian Sheppard, Lori Stolz, Jeremy S Boyd, Martin Pusic, Jessica Baez, Patrick Minges, Matthew Swarm, Megan Hilbert, Marisa O'Brien, Katie Harris, Catherine Varner, Constance LeBlanc, Kathy Boutis","doi":"10.1111/acem.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to identify the most diagnostically challenging features in first-trimester point-of-care ultrasound (FT-POCUS) images. We also sought to determine the physician image review behaviors associated with increased diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study in a convenience sample of emergency physicians in the United States and Canada. The web-based intervention included 400 FT-POCUS cases acquired via the transabdominal or transvaginal approach. Participants reviewed FT-POCUS cases to identify pregnancy-related imaging findings. We captured clickstream-level data with each case encounter, including the correctness of a participant's response and physician image review behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 317 participants, who collectively generated 16,295 case interpretations. The most diagnostically challenging imaging findings included eccentrically located gestational sac and endometrial collection/heterogeneous uterine material (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Participants who reported \"definite\" certainty, as opposed to \"probable,\" demonstrated a significantly higher odds of getting the diagnosis of intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) present or absent correct (OR = 4.48; 95% CI 4.00, 5.01) and a lower odds of time spent reviewing cases (OR = 0.46; 95% CI 0.40, 0.51). Those who reviewed a higher proportion of available views per case were more likely to accurately identify a fetal heartbeat (OR = 1.51; 95% 1.34, 1.69), multiple IUPs (OR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.10, 1.61), and adnexal structures (OR = 1.11; 95% CI 1.04, 1.17), but less likely to correctly identify an IUP (OR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.88, 0.99) and endometrial fluid collection/heterogeneous uterine material (OR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.92, 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emergency physicians interpreting FT-POCUS images encountered specific diagnostic challenges that may increase risks to patient safety. We found that higher diagnostic confidence correlated with greater diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. Reviewing a larger proportion of available images improved diagnostic accuracy for some findings, but not for others.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to identify the most diagnostically challenging features in first-trimester point-of-care ultrasound (FT-POCUS) images. We also sought to determine the physician image review behaviors associated with increased diagnostic accuracy.
Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study in a convenience sample of emergency physicians in the United States and Canada. The web-based intervention included 400 FT-POCUS cases acquired via the transabdominal or transvaginal approach. Participants reviewed FT-POCUS cases to identify pregnancy-related imaging findings. We captured clickstream-level data with each case encounter, including the correctness of a participant's response and physician image review behaviors.
Results: We enrolled 317 participants, who collectively generated 16,295 case interpretations. The most diagnostically challenging imaging findings included eccentrically located gestational sac and endometrial collection/heterogeneous uterine material (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Participants who reported "definite" certainty, as opposed to "probable," demonstrated a significantly higher odds of getting the diagnosis of intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) present or absent correct (OR = 4.48; 95% CI 4.00, 5.01) and a lower odds of time spent reviewing cases (OR = 0.46; 95% CI 0.40, 0.51). Those who reviewed a higher proportion of available views per case were more likely to accurately identify a fetal heartbeat (OR = 1.51; 95% 1.34, 1.69), multiple IUPs (OR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.10, 1.61), and adnexal structures (OR = 1.11; 95% CI 1.04, 1.17), but less likely to correctly identify an IUP (OR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.88, 0.99) and endometrial fluid collection/heterogeneous uterine material (OR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.92, 0.99).
Conclusions: Emergency physicians interpreting FT-POCUS images encountered specific diagnostic challenges that may increase risks to patient safety. We found that higher diagnostic confidence correlated with greater diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. Reviewing a larger proportion of available images improved diagnostic accuracy for some findings, but not for others.
期刊介绍:
Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine.
The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more.
Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.