{"title":"A predictive model of delayed pseudoaneurysm formation in paediatric patients with isolated blunt splenic injury using logistic regression analysis","authors":"Haruka Taira, Hideto Yasuda, Morihiro Katsura, Takatoshi Oishi, Yutaro Shinzato, Yuki Kishihara, Shunsuke Amagasa, Masahiro Kashiura, Yutaka Kondo, Shigeki Kushimoto, Takashi Moriya","doi":"10.1002/ams2.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To develop and evaluate a predictive model for delayed pseudoaneurysm formation after non-operative management (NOM) in children with blunt splenic injuries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A post hoc analysis of a multicenter cohort study in Japan included patients aged ≤16 years who underwent NOM for isolated blunt splenic injuries. The outcome was the formation of a pseudoaneurysm, which was not identified on admission and confirmed at least 24 h after admission. Predictors were determined from data available within 24 h of hospital arrival. Five predictive models were developed using logistic regression analysis and evaluated using discrimination (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] and precision-recall curve [PRC]), calibration (calibration plot and Brier score) and decision curve analysis (DCA) with bootstrap resampling data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Pseudoaneurysms developed in 41 (9.4%) of 434 cases of isolated splenic injury in our cohort. Model 1 (19 predictors) had the highest ROC (0.828) and PRC (0.358), followed by model 5 (8 predictors; ROC 0.805, PRC 0.295). Calibration was similar across models, indicating good calibration. Models 1 and 5 outperformed the other DCAs. Overall, model 5, incorporating factors such as age, sex, Injury Severity Score, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale, contrast extravasation on computed tomography, concomitant injuries, cryoprecipitate dose and NOM details, was simpler and showed better predictive ability than the other models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A predictive model for delayed pseudoaneurysm formation was developed with moderate discrimination and calibration. Further improvement using different modelling methods, such as machine learning, may be necessary.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7196,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ams2.70073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.70073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
To develop and evaluate a predictive model for delayed pseudoaneurysm formation after non-operative management (NOM) in children with blunt splenic injuries.
Methods
A post hoc analysis of a multicenter cohort study in Japan included patients aged ≤16 years who underwent NOM for isolated blunt splenic injuries. The outcome was the formation of a pseudoaneurysm, which was not identified on admission and confirmed at least 24 h after admission. Predictors were determined from data available within 24 h of hospital arrival. Five predictive models were developed using logistic regression analysis and evaluated using discrimination (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] and precision-recall curve [PRC]), calibration (calibration plot and Brier score) and decision curve analysis (DCA) with bootstrap resampling data.
Results
Pseudoaneurysms developed in 41 (9.4%) of 434 cases of isolated splenic injury in our cohort. Model 1 (19 predictors) had the highest ROC (0.828) and PRC (0.358), followed by model 5 (8 predictors; ROC 0.805, PRC 0.295). Calibration was similar across models, indicating good calibration. Models 1 and 5 outperformed the other DCAs. Overall, model 5, incorporating factors such as age, sex, Injury Severity Score, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale, contrast extravasation on computed tomography, concomitant injuries, cryoprecipitate dose and NOM details, was simpler and showed better predictive ability than the other models.
Conclusion
A predictive model for delayed pseudoaneurysm formation was developed with moderate discrimination and calibration. Further improvement using different modelling methods, such as machine learning, may be necessary.