A predictive model of delayed pseudoaneurysm formation in paediatric patients with isolated blunt splenic injury using logistic regression analysis

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Haruka Taira, Hideto Yasuda, Morihiro Katsura, Takatoshi Oishi, Yutaro Shinzato, Yuki Kishihara, Shunsuke Amagasa, Masahiro Kashiura, Yutaka Kondo, Shigeki Kushimoto, Takashi Moriya
{"title":"A predictive model of delayed pseudoaneurysm formation in paediatric patients with isolated blunt splenic injury using logistic regression analysis","authors":"Haruka Taira,&nbsp;Hideto Yasuda,&nbsp;Morihiro Katsura,&nbsp;Takatoshi Oishi,&nbsp;Yutaro Shinzato,&nbsp;Yuki Kishihara,&nbsp;Shunsuke Amagasa,&nbsp;Masahiro Kashiura,&nbsp;Yutaka Kondo,&nbsp;Shigeki Kushimoto,&nbsp;Takashi Moriya","doi":"10.1002/ams2.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To develop and evaluate a predictive model for delayed pseudoaneurysm formation after non-operative management (NOM) in children with blunt splenic injuries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A post hoc analysis of a multicenter cohort study in Japan included patients aged ≤16 years who underwent NOM for isolated blunt splenic injuries. The outcome was the formation of a pseudoaneurysm, which was not identified on admission and confirmed at least 24 h after admission. Predictors were determined from data available within 24 h of hospital arrival. Five predictive models were developed using logistic regression analysis and evaluated using discrimination (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] and precision-recall curve [PRC]), calibration (calibration plot and Brier score) and decision curve analysis (DCA) with bootstrap resampling data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Pseudoaneurysms developed in 41 (9.4%) of 434 cases of isolated splenic injury in our cohort. Model 1 (19 predictors) had the highest ROC (0.828) and PRC (0.358), followed by model 5 (8 predictors; ROC 0.805, PRC 0.295). Calibration was similar across models, indicating good calibration. Models 1 and 5 outperformed the other DCAs. Overall, model 5, incorporating factors such as age, sex, Injury Severity Score, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale, contrast extravasation on computed tomography, concomitant injuries, cryoprecipitate dose and NOM details, was simpler and showed better predictive ability than the other models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A predictive model for delayed pseudoaneurysm formation was developed with moderate discrimination and calibration. Further improvement using different modelling methods, such as machine learning, may be necessary.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7196,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ams2.70073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.70073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To develop and evaluate a predictive model for delayed pseudoaneurysm formation after non-operative management (NOM) in children with blunt splenic injuries.

Methods

A post hoc analysis of a multicenter cohort study in Japan included patients aged ≤16 years who underwent NOM for isolated blunt splenic injuries. The outcome was the formation of a pseudoaneurysm, which was not identified on admission and confirmed at least 24 h after admission. Predictors were determined from data available within 24 h of hospital arrival. Five predictive models were developed using logistic regression analysis and evaluated using discrimination (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] and precision-recall curve [PRC]), calibration (calibration plot and Brier score) and decision curve analysis (DCA) with bootstrap resampling data.

Results

Pseudoaneurysms developed in 41 (9.4%) of 434 cases of isolated splenic injury in our cohort. Model 1 (19 predictors) had the highest ROC (0.828) and PRC (0.358), followed by model 5 (8 predictors; ROC 0.805, PRC 0.295). Calibration was similar across models, indicating good calibration. Models 1 and 5 outperformed the other DCAs. Overall, model 5, incorporating factors such as age, sex, Injury Severity Score, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale, contrast extravasation on computed tomography, concomitant injuries, cryoprecipitate dose and NOM details, was simpler and showed better predictive ability than the other models.

Conclusion

A predictive model for delayed pseudoaneurysm formation was developed with moderate discrimination and calibration. Further improvement using different modelling methods, such as machine learning, may be necessary.

Abstract Image

应用logistic回归分析分析小儿孤立性钝性脾损伤患者延迟性假性动脉瘤形成的预测模型
目的建立并评价儿童钝性脾损伤非手术治疗后延迟性假性动脉瘤形成的预测模型。方法对日本的一项多中心队列研究进行事后分析,该研究纳入了年龄≤16岁的患者,这些患者因孤立的钝性脾损伤接受了NOM治疗。结果是假性动脉瘤的形成,入院时未确诊,入院后至少24小时确诊。根据到达医院24小时内的可用数据确定预测因子。采用logistic回归分析建立了5个预测模型,并采用区分(受试者工作特征(ROC)和精确召回率曲线(PRC))、校准(校准图和Brier评分)和决策曲线分析(DCA)对自举重采样数据进行评估。结果本组434例孤立性脾损伤中41例(9.4%)发生假性动脉瘤。模型1(19个预测因子)的ROC(0.828)和PRC(0.358)最高,模型5(8个预测因子)次之;Roc 0.805, PRC 0.295)。各模型之间的校准相似,表明校准良好。模型1和模型5优于其他dca。综合考虑年龄、性别、损伤严重程度评分、美国创伤器官损伤外科协会评分、计算机断层造影剂外渗、伴随损伤、低温沉淀剂量和NOM细节等因素的模型5比其他模型更简单,预测能力更好。结论建立了延迟性假性动脉瘤形成的预测模型,具有适度的判别和校正。进一步改进使用不同的建模方法,如机器学习,可能是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acute Medicine & Surgery
Acute Medicine & Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信