Factors influencing online patient-reported ratings among shoulder surgeons

Q2 Medicine
Krishna N. Chopra MA, Sameer R. Khawaja BS, Anna L. Gorsky BS, Nicole L. Greene BA, Frank L. Vazquez BS, Joanne Y. Zhou MD, Zaamin B. Hussain MD, MEd, Michael B. Gottschalk MD, Eric R. Wagner MD, MS
{"title":"Factors influencing online patient-reported ratings among shoulder surgeons","authors":"Krishna N. Chopra MA,&nbsp;Sameer R. Khawaja BS,&nbsp;Anna L. Gorsky BS,&nbsp;Nicole L. Greene BA,&nbsp;Frank L. Vazquez BS,&nbsp;Joanne Y. Zhou MD,&nbsp;Zaamin B. Hussain MD, MEd,&nbsp;Michael B. Gottschalk MD,&nbsp;Eric R. Wagner MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patient-reported ratings serve as a model of satisfaction and can play a major role in patient recruitment. Many variables can influence ratings on physician review websites (PRWs), such as social media use, academic productivity, fellowship type, and practice setting. This study examines such factors and their relationship with average ratings and overall patient engagement on PRWs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons directory was queried for all active members who completed either a shoulder and elbow or sports medicine fellowship in the United States. Each name was searched online for professional accounts, and the number of followers was recorded for each. A summated social media presence score was calculated to identify the top 15% of social media users in each cohort. The presence of a practice group or personal website was also recorded, as was a surgeon's practice setting (academic vs. private) and region of practice. H-index was searched on Scopus. Average ratings, number of reviews, and number of comments were collected from Healthgrades, Google Reviews, and Vitals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 231 shoulder surgeons were included in this review. Compared to shoulder surgeons in academic practice, those in private practice had higher mean ratings and patient engagement on PRWs. When comparing fellowships, shoulder and elbow fellowship–trained surgeons had a greater mean number of ratings on Google than those who completed a sports medicine fellowship. The top 15% of social media users had higher average patient ratings and engagement on Healthgrades compared to the rest of the cohort. There was a positive association between h-index and average rating on Google. No significant associations were found between patient satisfaction and the prestige of medical school or residency program.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Several variables can influence patient satisfaction by way of average ratings and engagement on PRWs. Prospective patients are much more likely to select surgeons with higher ratings; thus, shoulder surgeons can use this information to capitalize on opportunities to improve patient retention, recruitment, and overall patient satisfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages 1371-1377"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266663832500132X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patient-reported ratings serve as a model of satisfaction and can play a major role in patient recruitment. Many variables can influence ratings on physician review websites (PRWs), such as social media use, academic productivity, fellowship type, and practice setting. This study examines such factors and their relationship with average ratings and overall patient engagement on PRWs.

Methods

The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons directory was queried for all active members who completed either a shoulder and elbow or sports medicine fellowship in the United States. Each name was searched online for professional accounts, and the number of followers was recorded for each. A summated social media presence score was calculated to identify the top 15% of social media users in each cohort. The presence of a practice group or personal website was also recorded, as was a surgeon's practice setting (academic vs. private) and region of practice. H-index was searched on Scopus. Average ratings, number of reviews, and number of comments were collected from Healthgrades, Google Reviews, and Vitals.

Results

A total of 231 shoulder surgeons were included in this review. Compared to shoulder surgeons in academic practice, those in private practice had higher mean ratings and patient engagement on PRWs. When comparing fellowships, shoulder and elbow fellowship–trained surgeons had a greater mean number of ratings on Google than those who completed a sports medicine fellowship. The top 15% of social media users had higher average patient ratings and engagement on Healthgrades compared to the rest of the cohort. There was a positive association between h-index and average rating on Google. No significant associations were found between patient satisfaction and the prestige of medical school or residency program.

Discussion

Several variables can influence patient satisfaction by way of average ratings and engagement on PRWs. Prospective patients are much more likely to select surgeons with higher ratings; thus, shoulder surgeons can use this information to capitalize on opportunities to improve patient retention, recruitment, and overall patient satisfaction.
影响肩部外科医生在线患者报告评分的因素
背景:患者报告的评分作为满意度的模型,在患者招募中发挥着重要作用。许多变量会影响医生评论网站(prw)的评分,如社交媒体的使用、学术生产力、奖学金类型和实践环境。本研究考察了这些因素及其与PRWs平均评分和整体患者参与的关系。方法查询美国肩关节外科医生目录中所有在美国完成肩关节或运动医学研究的活跃成员。我们在网上搜索了每个名字的专业账号,并记录了每个名字的关注者数量。计算出社交媒体存在的总得分,以确定每个队列中排名前15%的社交媒体用户。还记录了实践小组或个人网站的存在,以及外科医生的实践环境(学术与私人)和实践区域。H-index在Scopus上检索。从Healthgrades、谷歌reviews和vital中收集了平均评级、评论数量和评论数量。结果本综述共纳入231位肩关节外科医生。与学术实践中的肩外科医生相比,私人执业的肩外科医生在PRWs上的平均评分和患者参与度更高。当比较奖学金时,接受肩部和肘部奖学金培训的外科医生比完成运动医学奖学金的外科医生在b谷歌上的平均评分要高。社交媒体用户中排名前15%的人在健康评分上的平均评分和参与度高于其他人群。h指数与b谷歌的平均评级呈正相关。没有发现患者满意度与医学院或住院医师计划的声望之间有显著的关联。几个变量可以影响患者满意度的方式平均评分和参与的PRWs。潜在患者更有可能选择评分较高的外科医生;因此,肩关节外科医生可以利用这些信息来把握机会,提高患者的保留率、招募率和总体患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信