{"title":"Long Vax is delayed onset Long COVID","authors":"Thomas Bunker","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2025.111711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Long COVID is a common chronic health condition that impairs daily functioning and social connection. It affects multiple organs and is marked by fatigue, post-exertional malaise, cognitive impairment, and many autonomic dysfunctions. Post COVID-19 Vaccination Syndrome (PCVS), Post Acute Covid Vaccination Syndrome (PACVS), or simply ‘Long Vax’ is a large set of similar symptoms that first manifest hours, days or weeks following a COVID-19 vaccination. Perhaps because of the pandemic’s public health imperative to vaccinate populations and prevent acute COVID-19 deaths, the Long Vax phenomenon has been slow to be acknowledged and to the frustrated patient community post-vaccine issues seem like a taboo medical topic. Meanwhile, evidence is accumulating that low-level persistence of SARS-CoV-2 virus in a variety of cell types and tissues may be the root cause of Long COVID symptoms. We propose that based on the similarity of patient-reported symptoms, symptom prevalence, and patient demographics that Long COVID and Long Vax are the same medical condition. Furthermore, we propose that both have the same underlying pathobiology; viral persistence of SARS-CoV-2. This hypothesis implies that the same treatments that help Long COVID patients will also help Long Vax patients. It is important that Long Vax patients be identified in Long COVID cohorts and included for subgroup analyses in Long COVID clinical trials. As biomarkers and diagnostic tests for Long COVID are developed and validated, this hypothesis becomes easily testable as it predicts that the same measures will also be useful for characterizing Long Vax patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 111711"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987725001501","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Long COVID is a common chronic health condition that impairs daily functioning and social connection. It affects multiple organs and is marked by fatigue, post-exertional malaise, cognitive impairment, and many autonomic dysfunctions. Post COVID-19 Vaccination Syndrome (PCVS), Post Acute Covid Vaccination Syndrome (PACVS), or simply ‘Long Vax’ is a large set of similar symptoms that first manifest hours, days or weeks following a COVID-19 vaccination. Perhaps because of the pandemic’s public health imperative to vaccinate populations and prevent acute COVID-19 deaths, the Long Vax phenomenon has been slow to be acknowledged and to the frustrated patient community post-vaccine issues seem like a taboo medical topic. Meanwhile, evidence is accumulating that low-level persistence of SARS-CoV-2 virus in a variety of cell types and tissues may be the root cause of Long COVID symptoms. We propose that based on the similarity of patient-reported symptoms, symptom prevalence, and patient demographics that Long COVID and Long Vax are the same medical condition. Furthermore, we propose that both have the same underlying pathobiology; viral persistence of SARS-CoV-2. This hypothesis implies that the same treatments that help Long COVID patients will also help Long Vax patients. It is important that Long Vax patients be identified in Long COVID cohorts and included for subgroup analyses in Long COVID clinical trials. As biomarkers and diagnostic tests for Long COVID are developed and validated, this hypothesis becomes easily testable as it predicts that the same measures will also be useful for characterizing Long Vax patients.
期刊介绍:
Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.