Evaluating satellite data and deep learning for identifying direct deforestation drivers in Cameroon

IF 4.5 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Amandine Debus , Emilie Beauchamp , Justin Kamga , Astrid Verhegghen , Christiane Zébazé , Emily R. Lines
{"title":"Evaluating satellite data and deep learning for identifying direct deforestation drivers in Cameroon","authors":"Amandine Debus ,&nbsp;Emilie Beauchamp ,&nbsp;Justin Kamga ,&nbsp;Astrid Verhegghen ,&nbsp;Christiane Zébazé ,&nbsp;Emily R. Lines","doi":"10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Deforestation rates have been increasing in the Congo Basin in recent years, especially in Cameroon. To support actions to slow deforestation, Earth Observation (EO) has been used extensively to detect forest loss, but approaches to automatically identify specific drivers of deforestation in a level of detail that allows for intervention prioritisation (e.g. focusing on specific areas and actions, designing measures to address specific drivers) have been rare. In this paper, using a new country-specific dataset created for this task, we test whether deep learning with optical satellite data can reliably identify direct drivers of deforestation in Cameroon. We compare the effectiveness of two types of freely available optical satellite imagery of differing spatial resolutions: Landsat-8 (30 m) and NICFI PlanetScope (4.77 m). Since it can be challenging to know which collections are best suited for specific applications, we tested different ones to find the optimal approach. Our detailed classification strategy includes fifteen direct deforestation drivers for forest loss events taking place between 2015 and 2020. We obtain a macro-average F1 score of 0.77 with Landsat-8 data, and a macro-average F1 score of 0.65 with NICFI PlanetScope. Despite a coarser spatial resolution, Landsat-8 performs better than NICFI PlanetScope overall, including for small-scale drivers, although results vary by class. Using only a single-image approach, we achieve F1 scores above 0.65 for all classes except ‘Oil palm plantation’, ‘Hunting’ and ‘Fruit plantation’ with Landsat-8. Our results demonstrate the potential of this approach to monitor and analyse land-use changes leading to deforestation with more refined classes than before. Further, our study demonstrates the potential of leveraging existing available datasets and straightforwardly adapting a generalised framework for other regions experiencing rapid deforestation with only a relatively small amount of location-specific data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53227,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 101653"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235293852500206X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deforestation rates have been increasing in the Congo Basin in recent years, especially in Cameroon. To support actions to slow deforestation, Earth Observation (EO) has been used extensively to detect forest loss, but approaches to automatically identify specific drivers of deforestation in a level of detail that allows for intervention prioritisation (e.g. focusing on specific areas and actions, designing measures to address specific drivers) have been rare. In this paper, using a new country-specific dataset created for this task, we test whether deep learning with optical satellite data can reliably identify direct drivers of deforestation in Cameroon. We compare the effectiveness of two types of freely available optical satellite imagery of differing spatial resolutions: Landsat-8 (30 m) and NICFI PlanetScope (4.77 m). Since it can be challenging to know which collections are best suited for specific applications, we tested different ones to find the optimal approach. Our detailed classification strategy includes fifteen direct deforestation drivers for forest loss events taking place between 2015 and 2020. We obtain a macro-average F1 score of 0.77 with Landsat-8 data, and a macro-average F1 score of 0.65 with NICFI PlanetScope. Despite a coarser spatial resolution, Landsat-8 performs better than NICFI PlanetScope overall, including for small-scale drivers, although results vary by class. Using only a single-image approach, we achieve F1 scores above 0.65 for all classes except ‘Oil palm plantation’, ‘Hunting’ and ‘Fruit plantation’ with Landsat-8. Our results demonstrate the potential of this approach to monitor and analyse land-use changes leading to deforestation with more refined classes than before. Further, our study demonstrates the potential of leveraging existing available datasets and straightforwardly adapting a generalised framework for other regions experiencing rapid deforestation with only a relatively small amount of location-specific data.
评估卫星数据和深度学习,以确定喀麦隆森林砍伐的直接驱动因素
近年来,刚果盆地的森林砍伐率一直在上升,尤其是在喀麦隆。为了支持减缓森林砍伐的行动,地球观测(EO)已被广泛用于检测森林损失,但很少有方法能够在一定程度上自动识别森林砍伐的具体驱动因素,从而确定干预措施的优先次序(例如,关注特定地区和行动,设计针对特定驱动因素的措施)。在本文中,我们使用为此任务创建的新的国家特定数据集,测试了使用光学卫星数据的深度学习是否能够可靠地识别喀麦隆森林砍伐的直接驱动因素。我们比较了两种不同空间分辨率的免费光学卫星图像的有效性:Landsat-8(30米)和NICFI PlanetScope(4.77米)。由于很难知道哪些集合最适合特定的应用程序,因此我们测试了不同的集合以找到最佳方法。我们详细的分类策略包括2015年至2020年期间发生的森林损失事件的15个直接毁林驱动因素。Landsat-8数据的宏观平均F1得分为0.77,NICFI PlanetScope数据的宏观平均F1得分为0.65。尽管空间分辨率较低,但Landsat-8总体上比NICFI PlanetScope表现更好,包括小规模驾驶员,尽管结果因类别而异。仅使用单图像方法,我们使用Landsat-8获得了除“油棕种植园”,“狩猎”和“水果种植园”之外的所有类别的F1分数均高于0.65。我们的研究结果表明,这种方法在监测和分析导致森林砍伐的土地利用变化方面具有比以前更精细的分类潜力。此外,我们的研究表明,利用现有的可用数据集,直接将一个通用框架适用于其他经历快速森林砍伐的地区,而只有相对较少的特定地点数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
204
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: The journal ''Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment'' (RSASE) focuses on remote sensing studies that address specific topics with an emphasis on environmental and societal issues - regional / local studies with global significance. Subjects are encouraged to have an interdisciplinary approach and include, but are not limited by: " -Global and climate change studies addressing the impact of increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, CO2 emission, carbon balance and carbon mitigation, energy system on social and environmental systems -Ecological and environmental issues including biodiversity, ecosystem dynamics, land degradation, atmospheric and water pollution, urban footprint, ecosystem management and natural hazards (e.g. earthquakes, typhoons, floods, landslides) -Natural resource studies including land-use in general, biomass estimation, forests, agricultural land, plantation, soils, coral reefs, wetland and water resources -Agriculture, food production systems and food security outcomes -Socio-economic issues including urban systems, urban growth, public health, epidemics, land-use transition and land use conflicts -Oceanography and coastal zone studies, including sea level rise projections, coastlines changes and the ocean-land interface -Regional challenges for remote sensing application techniques, monitoring and analysis, such as cloud screening and atmospheric correction for tropical regions -Interdisciplinary studies combining remote sensing, household survey data, field measurements and models to address environmental, societal and sustainability issues -Quantitative and qualitative analysis that documents the impact of using remote sensing studies in social, political, environmental or economic systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信