Primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder: are there differences in scapular morphology, orientation, and rotator cuff action lines between patients and healthy controls?

Q2 Medicine
Doruk Akgün MD , Alp Paksoy MD , Paul Siegert MD , Isabella Weiß MD , Philipp Moroder MD
{"title":"Primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder: are there differences in scapular morphology, orientation, and rotator cuff action lines between patients and healthy controls?","authors":"Doruk Akgün MD ,&nbsp;Alp Paksoy MD ,&nbsp;Paul Siegert MD ,&nbsp;Isabella Weiß MD ,&nbsp;Philipp Moroder MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.03.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is currently no in depth description of glenoid vault morphology, the rotator cuff action lines, and scapulothoracic orientation in patients with shoulder osteoarthritis (OA). Therefore, the goal of this study was to provide a quantitative analysis of these parameters in Walch types A, B, and C, along with rotator cuff action lines, scapulothoracic orientation, and humeral head centering compared to healthy controls.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who were treated for primary shoulder OA in our hospital between 2010 and 2018 were included in this retrospective case-control study. The cases were categorized into type A, B, and C according to their glenoid morphology on computed tomography using the modified Walch classification and compared with a healthy control group in a matched-pair analysis (matching by age, gender, and affected side). The glenoid version, glenoid inclination, glenohumeral and scapulohumeral head centering, neck angle, glenoid and humeral offset, subscapularis (SSC) and infraspinatus (ISP) tendon traction vectors, and an overall rotator cuff (RC) vector were measured in a standardized axial plane. The protraction, internal rotation, upward rotation, translation, and tilt of the scapula were also measured in three-dimensional reconstructions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 59 shoulders in 47 patients were identified with the following distribution of Walch glenoid types: 24 type A, 30 type B, and 5 type C glenoids. Type A glenoids showed no differences compared to their control group except significantly higher SSC angle, higher resultant RC vector, and lower scapular tilt. Type B glenoids had higher glenoid version, lower glenoid inclination, higher SSC angle, lower ISP angle, higher resultant RC vector, and more posterior humeral offset in comparison with their control group. Scapulothoracic orientation measurements for type B glenoids indicated significantly reduced scapular internal and upward rotation, and lower scapular tilt compared to controls. Type C glenoids showed significantly higher glenoid version, lower glenoid inclination, higher posterior humeral offset, and lower ISP angle with no significant change in the resultant RC vector in comparison with their control group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with primary OA and glenoid type A barely show differences in scapular morphology and scapulathoracic orientation compared to a healthy control group. In contrast, patients with glenoid type B or C showed significant differences of scapulohumeral centering in glenoid version, humeral offset, and glenoid inclination compared to controls. Furthermore, despite the changes of SSP and ISP angles in type B glenoids, the humeral head stayed centered to the glenoid fossa.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages 1319-1326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638325001252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is currently no in depth description of glenoid vault morphology, the rotator cuff action lines, and scapulothoracic orientation in patients with shoulder osteoarthritis (OA). Therefore, the goal of this study was to provide a quantitative analysis of these parameters in Walch types A, B, and C, along with rotator cuff action lines, scapulothoracic orientation, and humeral head centering compared to healthy controls.

Methods

Patients who were treated for primary shoulder OA in our hospital between 2010 and 2018 were included in this retrospective case-control study. The cases were categorized into type A, B, and C according to their glenoid morphology on computed tomography using the modified Walch classification and compared with a healthy control group in a matched-pair analysis (matching by age, gender, and affected side). The glenoid version, glenoid inclination, glenohumeral and scapulohumeral head centering, neck angle, glenoid and humeral offset, subscapularis (SSC) and infraspinatus (ISP) tendon traction vectors, and an overall rotator cuff (RC) vector were measured in a standardized axial plane. The protraction, internal rotation, upward rotation, translation, and tilt of the scapula were also measured in three-dimensional reconstructions.

Results

A total of 59 shoulders in 47 patients were identified with the following distribution of Walch glenoid types: 24 type A, 30 type B, and 5 type C glenoids. Type A glenoids showed no differences compared to their control group except significantly higher SSC angle, higher resultant RC vector, and lower scapular tilt. Type B glenoids had higher glenoid version, lower glenoid inclination, higher SSC angle, lower ISP angle, higher resultant RC vector, and more posterior humeral offset in comparison with their control group. Scapulothoracic orientation measurements for type B glenoids indicated significantly reduced scapular internal and upward rotation, and lower scapular tilt compared to controls. Type C glenoids showed significantly higher glenoid version, lower glenoid inclination, higher posterior humeral offset, and lower ISP angle with no significant change in the resultant RC vector in comparison with their control group.

Conclusion

Patients with primary OA and glenoid type A barely show differences in scapular morphology and scapulathoracic orientation compared to a healthy control group. In contrast, patients with glenoid type B or C showed significant differences of scapulohumeral centering in glenoid version, humeral offset, and glenoid inclination compared to controls. Furthermore, despite the changes of SSP and ISP angles in type B glenoids, the humeral head stayed centered to the glenoid fossa.
原发性肩胛骨关节炎:患者与健康对照者肩胛骨形态、方向和肩袖活动线是否存在差异?
背景:目前还没有关于肩关节关节炎(OA)患者肩胛拱顶形态、肩袖活动线和肩胸方向的深入描述。因此,本研究的目的是提供Walch a、B和C型患者这些参数的定量分析,以及与健康对照相比的肩袖活动线、肩胛骨胸椎方向和肱骨头定心。方法选取2010年至2018年在我院接受原发性肩关节关节炎治疗的患者进行回顾性病例对照研究。采用改进的Walch分类,根据患者肩关节形态的计算机断层扫描将其分为A型、B型和C型,并与健康对照组进行配对分析(按年龄、性别和患病侧进行配对)。在标准轴向平面上测量肩胛盂位、肩胛盂倾角、肩胛和肩胛骨头定心、颈角、肩胛和肱骨偏移、肩胛下肌(SSC)和棘下肌(ISP)肌腱牵引矢量以及整体肩袖(RC)矢量。在三维重建中还测量了肩胛骨的拉伸、内旋、向上旋、平移和倾斜。结果47例患者59个肩关节的Walch肩关节类型分布如下:A型24个,B型30个,C型5个。与对照组相比,A型肩关节没有差异,除了SSC角度明显增加,RC矢量明显增加,肩胛骨倾斜较小。与对照组相比,B型肩关节有更高的肩关节形态、更低的肩关节倾角、更高的SSC角、更低的ISP角、更高的RC矢量和更大的肱骨后偏置。B型肩胛骨的胸椎方向测量显示,与对照组相比,肩胛骨内旋和上旋明显减少,肩胛骨下倾明显减少。与对照组相比,C型关节盂的关节盂形状明显增大,关节盂倾角较小,肱骨后偏置较大,关节内关节夹角较小,而RC矢量无明显变化。结论原发性骨关节炎和A型肩胛骨与健康对照组在肩胛骨形态和肩胛骨朝向上几乎没有差异。相比之下,与对照组相比,B型或C型肩胛肱骨定心在肩关节内旋、肱骨偏移和肩关节倾斜方面存在显著差异。此外,尽管B型肩关节的SSP和ISP角度发生了变化,但肱骨头仍保持在肩关节窝的中心位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信