Pain severity during infiltration of local anesthesia before spinal anesthesia as a predictor of post-cesarean pain and Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery scores (ObsQoR-11): a prospective observational study
C.P. McKenzie , E. Dengler , C. Hood , W. Hart , J. Swengel , J. Gue , X. An , L. Straube , M. Sidani , B. Cobb
{"title":"Pain severity during infiltration of local anesthesia before spinal anesthesia as a predictor of post-cesarean pain and Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery scores (ObsQoR-11): a prospective observational study","authors":"C.P. McKenzie , E. Dengler , C. Hood , W. Hart , J. Swengel , J. Gue , X. An , L. Straube , M. Sidani , B. Cobb","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pain during infiltration of local anesthesia (ILA) before spinal anesthesia is a clinical measure shown to predict post-cesarean pain. We evaluated ILA as a predictor of post-cesarean pain and functional recovery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing cesarean delivery with neuraxial anesthesia were recruited. Pain during ILA (lidocaine 1% 3 mL) was assessed with numerical rating scale (NRS; 0–100). At 24 hours postpartum, six NRS pain scores (average and peak pain at rest, movement, and uterine cramping), ObsQoR-11 and global health rating were recorded. Outcome data compared three groups according to pain during ILA: mild (≤30), moderate (31–69), and severe (≥70). Principal component analysis was used to determine the number of effective independent tests and <em>P</em> value thresholds (resulting in significant <em>P</em> <0.017 for primary outcomes and <em>P</em> <0.013 for other outcomes).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 114 participants, 83 (72.8%) had mild ILA, 24 (21.1%) had moderate ILA, and 7 (6.1%) had severe ILA. Median rest pain was 20.0 (95% CI 10.0 to 20.0) in mild ILA group, 35 (95% CI 20.0 to 50.0) in moderate ILA group, and 45.0 (95% CI 30.0 to 60.0) in severe ILA group (<em>P</em> <0.001). Median ObsQoR-11 score was not significantly different between groups (90.0 (95% CI 83.0 to 92.0), 74.0 (95% CI 65.0 to 79.0), and 88.0 (95% CI 58.0 to 90.0), respectively; <em>P</em> = 0.021). Median global health rating at 24 hours was 70.0 (95% CI 70.0 to 73.0), 60.0 (95% CI 50.0 to 67.5), and 70.0 (95% CI 40.0 to 80.0), respectively (<em>P</em> =0.010).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Our findings suggest that pain during ILA may serve as a clinical predictor of post-cesarean pain; however, it was not associated with lower ObsQoR-11 scores.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 104709"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25003012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Pain during infiltration of local anesthesia (ILA) before spinal anesthesia is a clinical measure shown to predict post-cesarean pain. We evaluated ILA as a predictor of post-cesarean pain and functional recovery.
Methods
Patients undergoing cesarean delivery with neuraxial anesthesia were recruited. Pain during ILA (lidocaine 1% 3 mL) was assessed with numerical rating scale (NRS; 0–100). At 24 hours postpartum, six NRS pain scores (average and peak pain at rest, movement, and uterine cramping), ObsQoR-11 and global health rating were recorded. Outcome data compared three groups according to pain during ILA: mild (≤30), moderate (31–69), and severe (≥70). Principal component analysis was used to determine the number of effective independent tests and P value thresholds (resulting in significant P <0.017 for primary outcomes and P <0.013 for other outcomes).
Results
Of 114 participants, 83 (72.8%) had mild ILA, 24 (21.1%) had moderate ILA, and 7 (6.1%) had severe ILA. Median rest pain was 20.0 (95% CI 10.0 to 20.0) in mild ILA group, 35 (95% CI 20.0 to 50.0) in moderate ILA group, and 45.0 (95% CI 30.0 to 60.0) in severe ILA group (P <0.001). Median ObsQoR-11 score was not significantly different between groups (90.0 (95% CI 83.0 to 92.0), 74.0 (95% CI 65.0 to 79.0), and 88.0 (95% CI 58.0 to 90.0), respectively; P = 0.021). Median global health rating at 24 hours was 70.0 (95% CI 70.0 to 73.0), 60.0 (95% CI 50.0 to 67.5), and 70.0 (95% CI 40.0 to 80.0), respectively (P =0.010).
Discussion
Our findings suggest that pain during ILA may serve as a clinical predictor of post-cesarean pain; however, it was not associated with lower ObsQoR-11 scores.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient.
• Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered.
• The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia.
• Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome.
The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.