Evolution and trends in the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocations: an epidemiological analysis from Germany between 2013 and 2023

Q2 Medicine
Philipp Herrmann MD, Martin Luedemann MD, Thilo Lehmeyer MD, Sebastian Frischholz MD, Maximilian Rudert MD, Kilian List MD, Ioannis Stratos MD, Felix Hochberger MD
{"title":"Evolution and trends in the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocations: an epidemiological analysis from Germany between 2013 and 2023","authors":"Philipp Herrmann MD,&nbsp;Martin Luedemann MD,&nbsp;Thilo Lehmeyer MD,&nbsp;Sebastian Frischholz MD,&nbsp;Maximilian Rudert MD,&nbsp;Kilian List MD,&nbsp;Ioannis Stratos MD,&nbsp;Felix Hochberger MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to analyze nationwide trends in the management of hospitalized patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocations (ACJDs) in Germany over the past decade, focusing on surgical procedures and demographic patient data. The investigation examines the shift from conventional open stabilization techniques to mini-open and arthroscopically assisted approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Hospital billing data from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (2013-2023) were analyzed, including patients diagnosed with ACJD (International Classification of Diseases-10: primary diagnosis International Classification of Diseases S43.1) who underwent surgical reconstruction of the ACJD (German Operation and Procedure Classification System codes: 5-814b, 5-807.4, 5-807.5, 5-807.6, 5-930.0, 5-852.f, and 5-852.f8). Data included year of diagnosis, patient sex, surgical codes, and age (grouped in 5-year intervals). Data processing used R software for transformation and Tableau Desktop for subgroup analyses, stratified by type of procedure type, sex, and age. Statistical analyses, including linear regression and chi-squared tests, were conducted using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance was set at <em>P</em> ≤ .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 2013 to 2023, 82,254 patients were hospitalized and surgically treated for ACJD in Germany, indicating a decline in inpatient surgical management (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). This reduction primarily reflects a decrease in the number of inpatient procedures rather than changes in hospitalization duration or a shift toward outpatient surgery. Arthroscopically assisted stabilization increased from 19.6% in 2013 to 37.5% in 2023, becoming the most common surgical technique, while open techniques, such as plate stabilization and screw or Kirschner wire fixation, significantly decreased (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). Tendon augmentation procedures showed a notable rise despite their rarity (<em>P</em> &lt; .005). Arthroscopic techniques were predominantly used in younger patients (mean age: 39.6 years), while open reduction with plates was the most commonly used method in the age group over 60 years (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). ACJD incidence was 8.2 times higher in men than women, with significant male dominance across all surgical techniques (<em>P</em> &lt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Over the past decade, the management of ACJD s in Germany has shifted toward arthroscopically assisted stabilization, particularly in younger patients, while traditional open techniques have declined. Numbers of hospitalized treated cases have decreased, with a strong male predominance and age-related preferences influencing surgical approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages 1040-1047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638325000878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to analyze nationwide trends in the management of hospitalized patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocations (ACJDs) in Germany over the past decade, focusing on surgical procedures and demographic patient data. The investigation examines the shift from conventional open stabilization techniques to mini-open and arthroscopically assisted approaches.

Materials and methods

Hospital billing data from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (2013-2023) were analyzed, including patients diagnosed with ACJD (International Classification of Diseases-10: primary diagnosis International Classification of Diseases S43.1) who underwent surgical reconstruction of the ACJD (German Operation and Procedure Classification System codes: 5-814b, 5-807.4, 5-807.5, 5-807.6, 5-930.0, 5-852.f, and 5-852.f8). Data included year of diagnosis, patient sex, surgical codes, and age (grouped in 5-year intervals). Data processing used R software for transformation and Tableau Desktop for subgroup analyses, stratified by type of procedure type, sex, and age. Statistical analyses, including linear regression and chi-squared tests, were conducted using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance was set at P ≤ .05.

Results

From 2013 to 2023, 82,254 patients were hospitalized and surgically treated for ACJD in Germany, indicating a decline in inpatient surgical management (P < .05). This reduction primarily reflects a decrease in the number of inpatient procedures rather than changes in hospitalization duration or a shift toward outpatient surgery. Arthroscopically assisted stabilization increased from 19.6% in 2013 to 37.5% in 2023, becoming the most common surgical technique, while open techniques, such as plate stabilization and screw or Kirschner wire fixation, significantly decreased (P < .05). Tendon augmentation procedures showed a notable rise despite their rarity (P < .005). Arthroscopic techniques were predominantly used in younger patients (mean age: 39.6 years), while open reduction with plates was the most commonly used method in the age group over 60 years (P < .05). ACJD incidence was 8.2 times higher in men than women, with significant male dominance across all surgical techniques (P < .05).

Conclusions

Over the past decade, the management of ACJD s in Germany has shifted toward arthroscopically assisted stabilization, particularly in younger patients, while traditional open techniques have declined. Numbers of hospitalized treated cases have decreased, with a strong male predominance and age-related preferences influencing surgical approaches.
肩锁关节脱位治疗的演变和趋势:2013年至2023年德国流行病学分析
目的本研究旨在分析过去十年来德国肩锁关节脱位(ACJDs)住院患者的管理趋势,重点关注外科手术和人口统计患者数据。该研究探讨了从传统的开放稳定技术到小开放和关节镜辅助入路的转变。材料与方法分析德国联邦统计局2013-2023年的医院账单数据,包括诊断为ACJD(国际疾病分类-10:初级诊断国际疾病分类S43.1)并行ACJD手术重建的患者(德国手术与程序分类系统代码:5-814b, 5-807.4, 5-807.5, 5-807.6, 5-930.0, 5-852)。F,和5-852.f8)。数据包括诊断年份、患者性别、手术代码和年龄(以5年为间隔分组)。数据处理使用R软件进行转换,使用Tableau Desktop进行亚组分析,按手术类型、性别和年龄进行分层。使用GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA)进行统计分析,包括线性回归和卡方检验。P≤0.05有统计学意义。结果2013 - 2023年,德国ACJD住院和手术治疗患者82254例,住院手术治疗下降(P <;. 05)。这种减少主要反映了住院手术次数的减少,而不是住院时间的变化或转向门诊手术。关节镜辅助稳定从2013年的19.6%上升到2023年的37.5%,成为最常见的手术技术,而开放技术,如钢板稳定和螺钉或克氏针固定,明显下降(P <;. 05)。肌腱增强手术尽管罕见,但仍显著增加(P <;.005)。关节镜技术主要用于年轻患者(平均年龄:39.6岁),而开放钢板复位是60岁以上年龄组最常用的方法(P <;. 05)。ACJD的发病率男性比女性高8.2倍,在所有手术技术中男性占明显优势(P <;. 05)。在过去的十年中,德国ACJD的治疗已经转向关节镜辅助稳定,特别是在年轻患者中,而传统的开放技术已经下降。住院治疗的病例数量减少,男性占优势,年龄相关的偏好影响手术方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信