Alessia Lombardi , Antonio Paparella , Massimiliano Borrello , Francesco Caracciolo , Luigi Cembalo
{"title":"Exploring sufficiency in meat diets: are consumers ready for consumption corridors?","authors":"Alessia Lombardi , Antonio Paparella , Massimiliano Borrello , Francesco Caracciolo , Luigi Cembalo","doi":"10.1016/j.eist.2025.101026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study highlights sufficiency principles and utilizes the consumption corridors (CC) framework to examine meat consumption. Conducted through a scenario-based experimental study with 901 participants representative of the Italian population, the research aimed to: explore perceptions of the CC concept, evaluate acceptance of a meat consumption reduction policy within CC standards, and identify factors influencing policy support. Findings showed moderate acceptance of the CC concept. The proposed policy received notable support (64 % of respondents), particularly for immediate implementation. Favourable individuals were predominantly altruistic, women, aged 55–70, with low meat consumption frequency and minimal association of meat with essential needs satisfaction. The study underscores the utility of the CC framework for designing and evaluating policies focused on reducing consumption. It offers valuable guidance for researchers and policymakers addressing Anthropocene challenges by fostering transitions toward sustainable consumption practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54294,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101026"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422425000656","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study highlights sufficiency principles and utilizes the consumption corridors (CC) framework to examine meat consumption. Conducted through a scenario-based experimental study with 901 participants representative of the Italian population, the research aimed to: explore perceptions of the CC concept, evaluate acceptance of a meat consumption reduction policy within CC standards, and identify factors influencing policy support. Findings showed moderate acceptance of the CC concept. The proposed policy received notable support (64 % of respondents), particularly for immediate implementation. Favourable individuals were predominantly altruistic, women, aged 55–70, with low meat consumption frequency and minimal association of meat with essential needs satisfaction. The study underscores the utility of the CC framework for designing and evaluating policies focused on reducing consumption. It offers valuable guidance for researchers and policymakers addressing Anthropocene challenges by fostering transitions toward sustainable consumption practices.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions serves as a platform for reporting studies on innovations and socio-economic transitions aimed at fostering an environmentally sustainable economy, thereby addressing structural resource scarcity and environmental challenges, particularly those associated with fossil energy use and climate change. The journal focuses on various forms of innovation, including technological, organizational, economic, institutional, and political, as well as economy-wide and sectoral changes in areas such as energy, transport, agriculture, and water management. It endeavors to tackle complex questions concerning social, economic, behavioral-psychological, and political barriers and opportunities, along with their intricate interactions. With a multidisciplinary approach and methodological openness, the journal welcomes contributions from a wide array of disciplines within the social, environmental, and innovation sciences.