'Do Fever-Sugar-Swallow Protocols improve nurses' and physicians' satisfaction with the management of fever, hyperglycemia and dysphagia in stroke patients: A pre-and post-implementation survey of the “Quality in Acute Stroke Care” (QASC) Program‘

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING
Anne-Kathrin Cassier-Woidasky , Winfried Zinn , Sandy Middleton , Simeon Dale , Waltraud Pfeilschifter
{"title":"'Do Fever-Sugar-Swallow Protocols improve nurses' and physicians' satisfaction with the management of fever, hyperglycemia and dysphagia in stroke patients: A pre-and post-implementation survey of the “Quality in Acute Stroke Care” (QASC) Program‘","authors":"Anne-Kathrin Cassier-Woidasky ,&nbsp;Winfried Zinn ,&nbsp;Sandy Middleton ,&nbsp;Simeon Dale ,&nbsp;Waltraud Pfeilschifter","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nurses play a key role for delivery of high-quality patient care in the interprofessional stroke team. Nurses’ autonomy and advanced competencies are essential to a positive work environment, yet, are not well developed in Germany.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess whether using the Fever-Sugar-Swallow (FeSS) Protocols in stroke care improves: a) nurses’ satisfaction regarding their ability to autonomously manage fever, hyperglycemia, and dysphagia; and b) physicians’ satisfaction regarding the management of these parameters in German stroke units.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A pre-test/post-test survey administered to nursing and medical staff in eight stroke units was conducted prior to and following implementation of the FeSS Protocols.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An online survey, comprising items regarding global job satisfaction, the target parameters and control parameters, was distributed to participating stroke units. T-tests were calculated for significance between pre-post implementation, Cohen’s d was used to measure the effect size.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 308 respondents (nurses <em>n</em> = 112 [pre], <em>n</em> = 65 [post]; physicians <em>n</em> = 82 [pre], <em>n</em> = 49 [post]) from 8 stroke units completed the survey (response rates: 49 % nurses; 53 % physicians). There were no significant differences regarding global job satisfaction, but nurses were significantly more likely to report improvements in autonomy regarding fever management (able to act autonomously (<em>p</em> = 0.006) and competently (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001)); perceived self-efficacy (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), regarding blood glucose management (able to act timely (<em>p</em> = 0.002) and competently (<em>p</em> = 0.007); perceived self-efficacy (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001)), and dysphagia management (able to act autonomously (<em>p</em> = 0.005) and timely (<em>p</em> = 0.007)). In the medical profession, improvements were reported in training activities of new colleagues, not only regarding FeSS parameters fever (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and dysphagia (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), but also regarding management of other clinical issues which were not the subject of our intervention (restlessness (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and sleep disorders (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001)).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite a tightly-regulated mandatory quality assurance system with well-established therapy guidelines, the implementation of the FeSS Protocols in German stroke units revealed potential for improvement by improving autonomy for nurses as a regular part of nurses’ work clinical practice, as it is common in other countries of the world. This would not only improve the quality of care, but could also contribute to increase attractiveness of work at the stroke unit.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>Not registered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100374"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X25000803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nurses play a key role for delivery of high-quality patient care in the interprofessional stroke team. Nurses’ autonomy and advanced competencies are essential to a positive work environment, yet, are not well developed in Germany.

Objective

To assess whether using the Fever-Sugar-Swallow (FeSS) Protocols in stroke care improves: a) nurses’ satisfaction regarding their ability to autonomously manage fever, hyperglycemia, and dysphagia; and b) physicians’ satisfaction regarding the management of these parameters in German stroke units.

Design

A pre-test/post-test survey administered to nursing and medical staff in eight stroke units was conducted prior to and following implementation of the FeSS Protocols.

Methods

An online survey, comprising items regarding global job satisfaction, the target parameters and control parameters, was distributed to participating stroke units. T-tests were calculated for significance between pre-post implementation, Cohen’s d was used to measure the effect size.

Results

A total of 308 respondents (nurses n = 112 [pre], n = 65 [post]; physicians n = 82 [pre], n = 49 [post]) from 8 stroke units completed the survey (response rates: 49 % nurses; 53 % physicians). There were no significant differences regarding global job satisfaction, but nurses were significantly more likely to report improvements in autonomy regarding fever management (able to act autonomously (p = 0.006) and competently (p < 0.001)); perceived self-efficacy (p < 0.001), regarding blood glucose management (able to act timely (p = 0.002) and competently (p = 0.007); perceived self-efficacy (p < 0.001)), and dysphagia management (able to act autonomously (p = 0.005) and timely (p = 0.007)). In the medical profession, improvements were reported in training activities of new colleagues, not only regarding FeSS parameters fever (p < 0.001) and dysphagia (p < 0.001), but also regarding management of other clinical issues which were not the subject of our intervention (restlessness (p < 0.001), and sleep disorders (p < 0.001)).

Conclusions

Despite a tightly-regulated mandatory quality assurance system with well-established therapy guidelines, the implementation of the FeSS Protocols in German stroke units revealed potential for improvement by improving autonomy for nurses as a regular part of nurses’ work clinical practice, as it is common in other countries of the world. This would not only improve the quality of care, but could also contribute to increase attractiveness of work at the stroke unit.

Registration

Not registered.
“发热-糖-吞咽方案是否提高了护士和医生对卒中患者发热、高血糖和吞咽困难管理的满意度:“急性卒中护理质量”(QASC)项目实施前后的调查”
背景:在跨专业的中风治疗团队中,护士在提供高质量的患者护理方面发挥着关键作用。护士的自主性和高级能力对于积极的工作环境至关重要,然而,在德国并没有得到很好的发展。目的评估在卒中护理中使用发热-糖-吞咽(FeSS)方案是否能提高:a)护士对自主管理发热、高血糖和吞咽困难能力的满意度;b)医生对德国卒中单位这些参数管理的满意度。设计:在实施FeSS方案之前和之后,对8个卒中单位的护理和医务人员进行了测试前/测试后调查。方法对各卒中单位进行在线问卷调查,问卷内容包括总体工作满意度、目标参数和控制参数。采用t检验计算实施前后的显著性,采用Cohen’s d衡量效应量。结果共308名受访护士(护士前112名,后65名;来自8个卒中单位的医生(n = 82[前],n = 49[后])完成了调查(回复率:49%的护士;53%医生)。在整体工作满意度方面没有显著差异,但护士更有可能报告在发烧管理方面的自主权得到改善(能够自主行动(p = 0.006))和胜任(p <;0.001));自我效能感(p <;0.001),在血糖管理方面(能够及时(p = 0.002)和胜任(p = 0.007);自我效能感(p <;吞咽困难管理(能够自主行动(p = 0.005)和及时行动(p = 0.007))。在医疗行业,据报道,新同事的培训活动有所改善,不仅在FeSS参数发烧方面(p <;0.001)和吞咽困难(p <;0.001),但也涉及到其他临床问题的管理,这些问题不是我们干预的主题(躁动(p <;0.001)和睡眠障碍(p <;0.001))。结论:尽管有严格监管的强制性质量保证体系和完善的治疗指南,FeSS协议在德国中风单位的实施显示出通过提高护士的自主权作为护士临床工作的常规部分来改善的潜力,因为这在世界其他国家很常见。这不仅会提高护理质量,而且还有助于增加中风单位工作的吸引力。RegistrationNot注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信