Association Between Race/Ethnicity and Spinal Fusion Outcomes in a Managed Health-Care Model.

Kern H Guppy,Priscilla H Chan,Heather A Prentice,Jessica E Harris,Elizabeth W Paxton,Elizabeth P Norheim,Harsimran S Brara,Andrew J Schoenfeld
{"title":"Association Between Race/Ethnicity and Spinal Fusion Outcomes in a Managed Health-Care Model.","authors":"Kern H Guppy,Priscilla H Chan,Heather A Prentice,Jessica E Harris,Elizabeth W Paxton,Elizabeth P Norheim,Harsimran S Brara,Andrew J Schoenfeld","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.01565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nRace and ethnicity and insurance status have been identified as major contributors to disparities in health care. Several studies have analyzed racial and ethnic disparities in patients with private and government insurances, but very little is known about disparities in managed care models. Kaiser Permanente (KP) is a health-care organization (health maintenance organization, HMO) within the managed health-care system. It provides integrated care through its network of facilities and doctors, with equal access to all of its beneficiaries. Hence, the objective of this study was to determine whether there are health-care disparities in spinal fusion outcomes among patients enrolled in a managed health-care system such as Kaiser Permanente.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nUsing data from the KP Spine Registry, we performed a retrospective cohort study of adults ≥18 years of age who underwent spinal fusion. The predictor was race/ethnicity (White [reference], Black, Hispanic, Asian). The primary outcome was reoperations, and the secondary outcomes were 90-day emergency department (ED) visits, 90-day readmissions, and 90-day and 1-year mortality. Multivariable Cox regression and logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounders.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWe included 40,258 patients with spinal fusions. A lower reoperation risk was observed for Black (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.82 to 0.99; p = 0.038), Hispanic (HR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.71 to 0.85; p < 0.001), and Asian (HR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.71; p < 0.001) patients. Black (odds ratio [OR] = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.36; p < 0.001) and Hispanic (OR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.25; p < 0.001) patients had a higher likelihood of an ED visit within 90 days. A higher likelihood of readmission within 90 days was also observed for Black patients (OR = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.32; p = 0.005). No significant differences in 90-day and 1-year mortality were observed.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nDespite equal access to spine surgery in a managed health-care system such as Kaiser Permanente, our study showed that some disparities exist among Black and Hispanic patients. We believe that managed care networks can reduce disparities relative to other health-care delivery systems, although more work needs to be done to ensure equitable outcomes in all domains. These findings underscore the urgent need to address these disparities with further research.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nPrognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.01565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Race and ethnicity and insurance status have been identified as major contributors to disparities in health care. Several studies have analyzed racial and ethnic disparities in patients with private and government insurances, but very little is known about disparities in managed care models. Kaiser Permanente (KP) is a health-care organization (health maintenance organization, HMO) within the managed health-care system. It provides integrated care through its network of facilities and doctors, with equal access to all of its beneficiaries. Hence, the objective of this study was to determine whether there are health-care disparities in spinal fusion outcomes among patients enrolled in a managed health-care system such as Kaiser Permanente. METHODS Using data from the KP Spine Registry, we performed a retrospective cohort study of adults ≥18 years of age who underwent spinal fusion. The predictor was race/ethnicity (White [reference], Black, Hispanic, Asian). The primary outcome was reoperations, and the secondary outcomes were 90-day emergency department (ED) visits, 90-day readmissions, and 90-day and 1-year mortality. Multivariable Cox regression and logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS We included 40,258 patients with spinal fusions. A lower reoperation risk was observed for Black (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.82 to 0.99; p = 0.038), Hispanic (HR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.71 to 0.85; p < 0.001), and Asian (HR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.71; p < 0.001) patients. Black (odds ratio [OR] = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.36; p < 0.001) and Hispanic (OR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.25; p < 0.001) patients had a higher likelihood of an ED visit within 90 days. A higher likelihood of readmission within 90 days was also observed for Black patients (OR = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.32; p = 0.005). No significant differences in 90-day and 1-year mortality were observed. CONCLUSIONS Despite equal access to spine surgery in a managed health-care system such as Kaiser Permanente, our study showed that some disparities exist among Black and Hispanic patients. We believe that managed care networks can reduce disparities relative to other health-care delivery systems, although more work needs to be done to ensure equitable outcomes in all domains. These findings underscore the urgent need to address these disparities with further research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
管理医疗模式中种族/民族与脊柱融合结果的关系
背景、种族和保险状况已被确定为造成保健方面差异的主要因素。有几项研究分析了私人和政府保险患者的种族和民族差异,但对管理式医疗模式的差异知之甚少。Kaiser Permanente (KP)是管理医疗保健系统内的医疗保健组织(健康维护组织,HMO)。它通过其设施和医生网络提供综合护理,所有受益者都能平等获得服务。因此,本研究的目的是确定在Kaiser Permanente等管理医疗保健系统登记的患者中,脊柱融合结果是否存在医疗保健差异。方法:使用KP脊柱登记处的数据,我们对≥18岁接受脊柱融合术的成年人进行了回顾性队列研究。预测因子是种族/民族(白人[参考]、黑人、西班牙裔、亚洲人)。主要结局是再手术,次要结局是90天急诊科(ED)就诊、90天再入院、90天和1年死亡率。采用多变量Cox回归和logistic回归模型对混杂因素进行校正。结果纳入40258例脊柱融合患者。黑人患者再手术风险较低(危险比[HR] = 0.90;95%置信区间[CI] = 0.82 ~ 0.99;p = 0.038),西班牙裔(HR = 0.78;95% CI = 0.71 ~ 0.85;p < 0.001),亚洲人(HR = 0.62;95% CI = 0.55 ~ 0.71;P < 0.001)。黑人(比值比[OR] = 1.25;95% CI = 1.14 ~ 1.36;p < 0.001)和西班牙裔(OR = 1.15;95% CI = 1.07 ~ 1.25;p < 0.001)患者在90天内急诊科就诊的可能性更高。黑人患者在90天内再入院的可能性也更高(OR = 1.18;95% CI = 1.05 ~ 1.32;P = 0.005)。90天死亡率和1年死亡率无显著差异。结论:尽管在Kaiser Permanente这样的管理医疗系统中,脊柱手术的机会是平等的,但我们的研究表明,黑人和西班牙裔患者之间存在一些差异。我们认为,管理式医疗网络可以减少相对于其他医疗保健提供系统的差距,尽管需要做更多的工作来确保所有领域的公平结果。这些发现强调了迫切需要通过进一步的研究来解决这些差异。证据水平:预后III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信