{"title":"Impact of VAEformer Compression Algorithm Precision Loss on the Tropospheric Delays for Microwave Remote Sensing","authors":"Junsheng Ding;Cancan Xu;Wu Chen;Junping Chen;Jungang Wang;Yize Zhang;Lei Bai;Tao Han;Yuhao Xiong","doi":"10.1109/TGRS.2025.3587944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ray-tracing through numerical weather models (NWMs) is one of the most accurate methods for determining slant tropospheric delays (STDs) in microwave remote sensing. However, the massive data volumes of high-resolution NWMs create substantial I/O operations, limiting large-scale ray-tracing on general hardware. This constraint has historically necessitated parameterized tropospheric delay models, which are disseminated as standardized products (e.g., zenith delays with mapping functions and horizontal gradients). Recently, the AI-driven VAEformer algorithm revolutionized NWM compression, achieving >470:1 ratios by compressing 37 pressure level, 0.25° <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\times$ </tex-math></inline-formula> 0.25° fifth-generation ECMWF atmospheric reanalysis (ERA5) data into files smaller than surface-only VMF3 products (1° <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\times$ </tex-math></inline-formula> 1° resolution). This breakthrough challenges the conventional reliance on parameterized models as the sole practical solution. We quantified discrepancies in tropospheric delay parameters between original ERA5 and variational autoencoder transformer (VAEformer)-compressed extreme compression of ERA5 (CRA5) data across 2022, evaluating compression fidelity on global grids and against in situ zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) estimates. Results show global average precision loss from compression is <2>10 mm). Our findings demonstrate CRA5 as a reliable ERA5 substitute, with compression-induced inaccuracies being negligible for most microwave-based remote sensing applications. This work underscores that parameterized delay modeling is no longer the exclusive pathway, enabling efficient local computation of high-precision STDs without through mapping functions and gradients.","PeriodicalId":13213,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing","volume":"63 ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11077436/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ray-tracing through numerical weather models (NWMs) is one of the most accurate methods for determining slant tropospheric delays (STDs) in microwave remote sensing. However, the massive data volumes of high-resolution NWMs create substantial I/O operations, limiting large-scale ray-tracing on general hardware. This constraint has historically necessitated parameterized tropospheric delay models, which are disseminated as standardized products (e.g., zenith delays with mapping functions and horizontal gradients). Recently, the AI-driven VAEformer algorithm revolutionized NWM compression, achieving >470:1 ratios by compressing 37 pressure level, 0.25° $\times$ 0.25° fifth-generation ECMWF atmospheric reanalysis (ERA5) data into files smaller than surface-only VMF3 products (1° $\times$ 1° resolution). This breakthrough challenges the conventional reliance on parameterized models as the sole practical solution. We quantified discrepancies in tropospheric delay parameters between original ERA5 and variational autoencoder transformer (VAEformer)-compressed extreme compression of ERA5 (CRA5) data across 2022, evaluating compression fidelity on global grids and against in situ zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) estimates. Results show global average precision loss from compression is <2>10 mm). Our findings demonstrate CRA5 as a reliable ERA5 substitute, with compression-induced inaccuracies being negligible for most microwave-based remote sensing applications. This work underscores that parameterized delay modeling is no longer the exclusive pathway, enabling efficient local computation of high-precision STDs without through mapping functions and gradients.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (TGRS) is a monthly publication that focuses on the theory, concepts, and techniques of science and engineering as applied to sensing the land, oceans, atmosphere, and space; and the processing, interpretation, and dissemination of this information.