Performance of the finnish diabetes risk score in screening for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes among adults without prior diagnosis: A Kharameh Cohort Study, Iran.

Andishe Hamedi, Mozhgan Seif, Mohammad Hossein Sharifi, Abbas Rezaianzadeh, Jafar Hassanzadeh
{"title":"Performance of the finnish diabetes risk score in screening for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes among adults without prior diagnosis: A Kharameh Cohort Study, Iran.","authors":"Andishe Hamedi, Mozhgan Seif, Mohammad Hossein Sharifi, Abbas Rezaianzadeh, Jafar Hassanzadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2025.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) as a potentially valuable tool for diabetes screening and prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized data from the Kharameh Cohort Study, which included 10,663 participants. Of these, 1600 individuals with known diabetes were excluded. Participants were assessed using the FINDRISC questionnaire and a fasting blood glucose test to determine their glucose metabolism status. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves evaluated the effectiveness of FINDRISC in identifying Undiagnosed Diabetes Mellitus (UDM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of individuals with UDM was 2.2 %. The FINDRISC score was 14.18 ± 4.46 for those with UDM, compared to 9.51 ± 4.69 for those without. Women had a mean FINDRISC score of 10.99 ± 4.42, significantly higher than the mean score of 8.07 ± 4.60 for men. The overall AUC-ROC curve for diagnosing UDM was 0.767 (95 % CI: 0.735-0.800). For men, it was 0.809 (95 % CI: 0.764-0.853), while for women, it was 0.737 (95 % CI: 0.689-0.785).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FINDRISC score demonstrates good accuracy in identifying individuals with UDM, making it a valuable and simple screening tool, especially in resource-limited settings. Significant gender differences were observed in the risk scores between women and men. Therefore, we recommend that screening tools be adapted to account for these gender differences, with particular attention to individuals with a family history of diabetes to improve early detection and prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94177,"journal":{"name":"Primary care diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary care diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2025.07.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) as a potentially valuable tool for diabetes screening and prevention.

Methods: This study utilized data from the Kharameh Cohort Study, which included 10,663 participants. Of these, 1600 individuals with known diabetes were excluded. Participants were assessed using the FINDRISC questionnaire and a fasting blood glucose test to determine their glucose metabolism status. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves evaluated the effectiveness of FINDRISC in identifying Undiagnosed Diabetes Mellitus (UDM).

Results: The prevalence of individuals with UDM was 2.2 %. The FINDRISC score was 14.18 ± 4.46 for those with UDM, compared to 9.51 ± 4.69 for those without. Women had a mean FINDRISC score of 10.99 ± 4.42, significantly higher than the mean score of 8.07 ± 4.60 for men. The overall AUC-ROC curve for diagnosing UDM was 0.767 (95 % CI: 0.735-0.800). For men, it was 0.809 (95 % CI: 0.764-0.853), while for women, it was 0.737 (95 % CI: 0.689-0.785).

Conclusions: The FINDRISC score demonstrates good accuracy in identifying individuals with UDM, making it a valuable and simple screening tool, especially in resource-limited settings. Significant gender differences were observed in the risk scores between women and men. Therefore, we recommend that screening tools be adapted to account for these gender differences, with particular attention to individuals with a family history of diabetes to improve early detection and prevention strategies.

芬兰糖尿病风险评分在未确诊的成人2型糖尿病筛查中的表现:伊朗Kharameh队列研究
目的:评估芬兰糖尿病风险评分(FINDRISC)作为糖尿病筛查和预防的潜在有价值工具的有效性。方法:本研究利用了Kharameh队列研究的数据,其中包括10,663名参与者。其中,1600名已知糖尿病患者被排除在外。使用FINDRISC问卷和空腹血糖测试对参与者进行评估,以确定他们的葡萄糖代谢状态。受试者工作特征曲线评估FINDRISC识别未确诊糖尿病(UDM)的有效性。结果:UDM个体患病率为2.2% %。UDM患者的FINDRISC评分为14.18 ± 4.46,而非UDM患者的FINDRISC评分为9.51 ± 4.69。女性的FINDRISC平均得分为10.99 ± 4.42,显著高于男性的平均得分8.07 ± 4.60。诊断UDM的总体AUC-ROC曲线为0.767(95 % CI: 0.735-0.800)。对于男性,它是0.809(95 % CI: 0.764-0.853),而对于女性,它是0.737(95 % CI: 0.689-0.785)。结论:FINDRISC评分在识别UDM个体方面具有良好的准确性,使其成为一种有价值且简单的筛查工具,特别是在资源有限的情况下。在风险评分上,男女之间存在显著的性别差异。因此,我们建议调整筛查工具以考虑这些性别差异,特别注意有糖尿病家族史的个体,以改善早期发现和预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信