Evaluating the mySugr diabetes app: A randomised controlled trial exploring changes in HbA1c and psychological outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Ashley Anjali Singh, Katie M Babbott, Simon Young, Zhenqiang Wu, Anna Serlachius
{"title":"Evaluating the mySugr diabetes app: A randomised controlled trial exploring changes in HbA1c and psychological outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes.","authors":"Ashley Anjali Singh, Katie M Babbott, Simon Young, Zhenqiang Wu, Anna Serlachius","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2025.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present study sought to explore if engagement with a commercially available diabetes app, mySugr, could facilitate improvement in glycaemic outcomes, diabetes self-care behaviours and psychological wellbeing compared to standard care among adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomised to the intervention (n = 31) or control group (n = 32) and assessed at 12 weeks after baseline. Changes to blood glucose levels (HbA1c) was the primary outcome of interest in the present study. Secondary outcomes included diabetes self-care behaviours, diabetes self-efficacy, diabetes distress, psychological well-being and general stress. These outcomes were quantitatively assessed via self-report questionnaires. Qualitative accounts of user engagement with the app were also explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five participants completed the 12-week follow-up questionnaires. The intervention group demonstrated a lower HbA1c than the control group at 12-weeks, however this change was not statistically significant (adjusted mean difference 4.20 mmol/mol, 95 % CI [-0.39,8.79], p = 0.072). Additionally, no significant changes across time or between-group differences were observed for secondary outcomes at 12 weeks. However, close to 80 % of participants in the intervention group reported using the app daily for 12 weeks, suggesting good user engagement. Further, users scored the app on average favourably on the uMARS scale (objective quality M=3.93, SD=0.55, subjective quality M=3.31, SD=0.99, perceived impact M=3.15, SD=1.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggest that mySugr is an engaging diabetes app. Preliminary findings suggest that the mySugr app may assist users in improving glycaemic levels over 12 weeks, but the trends found in the present study did not reach statistical significance. Thus, the study needs to be replicated in a larger sample size with a longer follow-up period to more robustly ascertain the effects of mySugr on glycaemic outcomes and diabetes self-management.</p>","PeriodicalId":94177,"journal":{"name":"Primary care diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary care diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2025.07.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The present study sought to explore if engagement with a commercially available diabetes app, mySugr, could facilitate improvement in glycaemic outcomes, diabetes self-care behaviours and psychological wellbeing compared to standard care among adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Methods: Participants were randomised to the intervention (n = 31) or control group (n = 32) and assessed at 12 weeks after baseline. Changes to blood glucose levels (HbA1c) was the primary outcome of interest in the present study. Secondary outcomes included diabetes self-care behaviours, diabetes self-efficacy, diabetes distress, psychological well-being and general stress. These outcomes were quantitatively assessed via self-report questionnaires. Qualitative accounts of user engagement with the app were also explored.

Results: Fifty-five participants completed the 12-week follow-up questionnaires. The intervention group demonstrated a lower HbA1c than the control group at 12-weeks, however this change was not statistically significant (adjusted mean difference 4.20 mmol/mol, 95 % CI [-0.39,8.79], p = 0.072). Additionally, no significant changes across time or between-group differences were observed for secondary outcomes at 12 weeks. However, close to 80 % of participants in the intervention group reported using the app daily for 12 weeks, suggesting good user engagement. Further, users scored the app on average favourably on the uMARS scale (objective quality M=3.93, SD=0.55, subjective quality M=3.31, SD=0.99, perceived impact M=3.15, SD=1.25).

Conclusion: Results suggest that mySugr is an engaging diabetes app. Preliminary findings suggest that the mySugr app may assist users in improving glycaemic levels over 12 weeks, but the trends found in the present study did not reach statistical significance. Thus, the study needs to be replicated in a larger sample size with a longer follow-up period to more robustly ascertain the effects of mySugr on glycaemic outcomes and diabetes self-management.

评估mysugar糖尿病应用程序:一项探索成人1型糖尿病患者HbA1c变化和心理结局的随机对照试验。
目的:本研究旨在探索与标准治疗相比,使用市售糖尿病应用程序mysugar是否可以促进1型糖尿病(T1D)成人血糖结局、糖尿病自我护理行为和心理健康的改善。方法:参与者被随机分为干预组(n = 31)或对照组(n = 32),并在基线后12周进行评估。血糖水平(HbA1c)的变化是本研究的主要目的。次要结局包括糖尿病自我护理行为、糖尿病自我效能、糖尿病困扰、心理健康和一般压力。这些结果通过自我报告问卷进行定量评估。我们还探讨了用户粘性的定性描述。结果:55名参与者完成了为期12周的随访问卷。干预组在12周时HbA1c低于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(调整后平均差异4.20 mmol/mol, 95 % CI [-0.39,8.79], p = 0.072)。此外,在12周时,次要结果在时间上或组间没有显著变化。然而,在干预组中,接近80% %的参与者报告说,他们在12周内每天都使用该应用程序,这表明用户粘性很好。此外,用户在uMARS量表上对该应用的平均评分为好评(客观质量M=3.93, SD=0.55,主观质量M=3.31, SD=0.99,感知影响M=3.15, SD=1.25)。结论:结果表明mysugar是一款引人关注的糖尿病应用程序。初步研究结果表明,mysugar应用程序可以帮助用户在12周内改善血糖水平,但本研究中发现的趋势没有达到统计学意义。因此,该研究需要在更大的样本量和更长的随访期内进行重复,以更有力地确定mysugar对血糖结局和糖尿病自我管理的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信