Cristian Rendon-Cardona, Marie-Anne Burcklen, Richard Legras, Christian Sandor
{"title":"Augmented Vision Systems: Paradigms and Applications.","authors":"Cristian Rendon-Cardona, Marie-Anne Burcklen, Richard Legras, Christian Sandor","doi":"10.1109/TVCG.2025.3587527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Augmented Reality (AR) has grown from specialised uses to applications for the common public. One of these developments led to Augmented Vision (AV), which enhances vision beyond traditional methods like glasses or contact lenses. This review aims to compare and categorise AV systems according to the paradigms they implement to enhance the users' vision. Additionally, the review examines whether researchers conduct measurements and analysis on the human visual system (HVS) when evaluating their system. Such an overall view will help future researchers position their work on AV. By understanding AV systems' paradigms and approaches, researchers will be well-equipped to identify gaps, explore novel directions, and leverage existing advancements. We searched Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases for publications until February 26, 2025, exploring citations and references for the selected articles to avoid missing out on relevant articles. We then conducted a two-step screening process that involved LLM-assisted screening of the article's abstracts and an in-depth assessment of the article. This review follows the PRISMA statement, reducing bias risk. We selected 113 of 469 articles, as they improved users' visual performance. We defined three main categories: (1) adding light to the incoming light field, (2) modifying the incoming light field, and (3) intersecting approaches. We found three main application areas: (1) task-specific, (2) vision correction, and (3) visual perception enhancement. The most typical application is task-specific. We identified a gap in the literature since just four of the papers we reviewed measured and analysed the accommodation while utilising the device.</p>","PeriodicalId":94035,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2025.3587527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Augmented Reality (AR) has grown from specialised uses to applications for the common public. One of these developments led to Augmented Vision (AV), which enhances vision beyond traditional methods like glasses or contact lenses. This review aims to compare and categorise AV systems according to the paradigms they implement to enhance the users' vision. Additionally, the review examines whether researchers conduct measurements and analysis on the human visual system (HVS) when evaluating their system. Such an overall view will help future researchers position their work on AV. By understanding AV systems' paradigms and approaches, researchers will be well-equipped to identify gaps, explore novel directions, and leverage existing advancements. We searched Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases for publications until February 26, 2025, exploring citations and references for the selected articles to avoid missing out on relevant articles. We then conducted a two-step screening process that involved LLM-assisted screening of the article's abstracts and an in-depth assessment of the article. This review follows the PRISMA statement, reducing bias risk. We selected 113 of 469 articles, as they improved users' visual performance. We defined three main categories: (1) adding light to the incoming light field, (2) modifying the incoming light field, and (3) intersecting approaches. We found three main application areas: (1) task-specific, (2) vision correction, and (3) visual perception enhancement. The most typical application is task-specific. We identified a gap in the literature since just four of the papers we reviewed measured and analysed the accommodation while utilising the device.
增强现实(AR)已经从专门用途发展成为面向公众的应用。其中一项发展导致了增强视觉(AV),它比眼镜或隐形眼镜等传统方法增强了视力。这篇综述的目的是根据他们实现的范例来比较和分类自动驾驶系统,以提高用户的视觉。此外,该综述还审查了研究人员在评估其系统时是否对人类视觉系统(HVS)进行测量和分析。这样的整体观点将有助于未来的研究人员定位他们在自动驾驶方面的工作。通过了解自动驾驶系统的范例和方法,研究人员将能够很好地识别差距,探索新的方向,并利用现有的进步。我们检索了Scopus、Web of Science和PubMed数据库中截止到2025年2月26日的出版物,对所选文章的引用和参考文献进行了检索,以避免错过相关文章。然后,我们进行了两步筛选过程,包括法学硕士协助筛选文章摘要和对文章进行深入评估。本综述遵循PRISMA声明,降低了偏倚风险。我们从469篇文章中选择了113篇,因为它们提高了用户的视觉表现。我们定义了三个主要类别:(1)向入射光场添加光,(2)修改入射光场,(3)相交方法。我们发现了三个主要的应用领域:(1)特定任务;(2)视力矫正;(3)视觉感知增强。最典型的应用程序是特定于任务的。我们在文献中发现了一个空白,因为我们审查的论文中只有四篇在使用该设备时测量和分析了适应性。