Dupilumab for Bullous Pemphigoid Related to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Retrospective Case Series.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf208
Ian Nykaza, Andrea Moy, Stephen W Dusza, Alison Moskowitz, Gopa Iyer, Afsheen Iqbal, Robert Motzer, David H Ilson, Roisin E O'Cearbhaill, Rashek Kazi, Jennifer Defazio, Allison Gordon, Alina Markova
{"title":"Dupilumab for Bullous Pemphigoid Related to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Retrospective Case Series.","authors":"Ian Nykaza, Andrea Moy, Stephen W Dusza, Alison Moskowitz, Gopa Iyer, Afsheen Iqbal, Robert Motzer, David H Ilson, Roisin E O'Cearbhaill, Rashek Kazi, Jennifer Defazio, Allison Gordon, Alina Markova","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy but are associated with treatment-limiting immune-related cutaneous adverse events (irCAEs). ICI-related Bullous pemphigoid (irBP), a severe, blistering irCAE occurs in 0.3-1.5% of patients receiving ICI therapy. While systemic steroids can be effective, they are associated with significant toxicity and may mitigate immunotherapy antitumor efficacy. Consequently, steroid-sparing therapies are needed. Dupilumab, an IL-4 and IL-13 receptor antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy in non-ICI-related BP and appears promising for managing irBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated with dupilumab for irBP from April 2020 to April 2024. Clinical data, outcomes, and adverse events were assessed. irBP response was categorized as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or no response (NR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>17 patients (59% male, 82% non-Hispanic White; mean age 72.7 years) developed irBP while receiving PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors. Sixteen patients (94%) received dupilumab for active irBP and one (6%) for prevention of recurrence. Dupilumab achieved CR of irBP for 12 patients (75%) and PR for two (12%) patients with active irBP. Ten (62%) achieved CR with dupilumab systemic monotherapy. Median time to first response was 19.5 days (range = 3-50). Most patients with CR (58%) failed prior oral corticosteroid therapy. The patient treated prophylactically experienced no irBP recurrence. Dupilumab was well-tolerated, with no adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dupilumab is a promising steroid-sparing option for irBP, achieving initial response in under 20 days for most cases. Dupilumab is a valuable tool to manage this challenging irCAE while minimizing risk related to systemic steroid treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy but are associated with treatment-limiting immune-related cutaneous adverse events (irCAEs). ICI-related Bullous pemphigoid (irBP), a severe, blistering irCAE occurs in 0.3-1.5% of patients receiving ICI therapy. While systemic steroids can be effective, they are associated with significant toxicity and may mitigate immunotherapy antitumor efficacy. Consequently, steroid-sparing therapies are needed. Dupilumab, an IL-4 and IL-13 receptor antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy in non-ICI-related BP and appears promising for managing irBP.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated with dupilumab for irBP from April 2020 to April 2024. Clinical data, outcomes, and adverse events were assessed. irBP response was categorized as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or no response (NR).

Results: 17 patients (59% male, 82% non-Hispanic White; mean age 72.7 years) developed irBP while receiving PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors. Sixteen patients (94%) received dupilumab for active irBP and one (6%) for prevention of recurrence. Dupilumab achieved CR of irBP for 12 patients (75%) and PR for two (12%) patients with active irBP. Ten (62%) achieved CR with dupilumab systemic monotherapy. Median time to first response was 19.5 days (range = 3-50). Most patients with CR (58%) failed prior oral corticosteroid therapy. The patient treated prophylactically experienced no irBP recurrence. Dupilumab was well-tolerated, with no adverse events.

Conclusions: Dupilumab is a promising steroid-sparing option for irBP, achieving initial response in under 20 days for most cases. Dupilumab is a valuable tool to manage this challenging irCAE while minimizing risk related to systemic steroid treatment.

Dupilumab治疗与免疫检查点抑制剂相关的大疱性类天疱疮:回顾性病例系列。
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已经彻底改变了癌症治疗,但与治疗限制性免疫相关皮肤不良事件(irCAEs)有关。ICI相关的大疱性类天疱疮(irBP)是一种严重的水泡性类天疱疮,在接受ICI治疗的患者中发生率为0.3-1.5%。虽然全身性类固醇可能有效,但它们具有显著的毒性,可能会降低免疫治疗的抗肿瘤效果。因此,需要保留类固醇的治疗。Dupilumab是一种IL-4和IL-13受体拮抗剂,已证明对非ici相关性BP有效,并且有望治疗irBP。方法:我们对2020年4月至2024年4月期间接受dupilumab治疗irBP的患者进行了回顾性分析。评估临床资料、结局和不良事件。irBP反应分为完全缓解(CR)、部分缓解(PR)和无缓解(NR)。结果:17例患者(男性59%,非西班牙裔白人82%;平均年龄72.7岁)在接受PD-1/PDL-1抑制剂时发生irBP。16名患者(94%)接受了dupilumab治疗活性irBP, 1名患者(6%)接受了dupilumab治疗预防复发。Dupilumab在12例(75%)患者中实现了irBP的CR,在2例(12%)活跃irBP患者中实现了PR。10例(62%)患者通过dupilumab系统单药治疗达到CR。到首次反应的中位时间为19.5天(范围= 3-50)。大多数CR患者(58%)先前口服皮质类固醇治疗失败。经预防性治疗的患者无irBP复发。Dupilumab耐受性良好,无不良事件。结论:Dupilumab是治疗irBP的一种有希望的节省类固醇的选择,大多数病例在20天内达到初始反应。Dupilumab是一种有价值的工具来管理这一具有挑战性的irCAE,同时最大限度地降低与全身类固醇治疗相关的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信