The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on kidney stone management in a single-payer system.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Adam Bobrowski, Simon Czajkowski, Katherine Lajkosz, Michael Ordon, Jason Y Lee
{"title":"The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on kidney stone management in a single-payer system.","authors":"Adam Bobrowski, Simon Czajkowski, Katherine Lajkosz, Michael Ordon, Jason Y Lee","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We examined the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of kidney stone acute care visits and interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study using linked administrative healthcare data in the province of Ontario, Canada. We included all patients who, between March 1, 2018, and September 30, 2021, presented to an emergency department (ED) or were admitted to hospital with renal colic (RC), as well as patients who underwent stenting, nephrostomy tube (NT) insertion, shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy (URS), or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Using univariate and multivariable analyses, outcomes of interest were compared before and after the onset of COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 149 006 unique patients; there were 74 994 pre- vs. 94 067 peri-COVID RC episodes (p=0.74). Peri-pandemic patients were more likely to be sicker, women, and from marginalized communities. Mean time from temporizing to definitive intervention increased in the first three months of the pandemic (17.9 vs. 32 days), but no statistically significant effect on the overall proportion of patients undergoing definitive intervention was observed. The onset of COVID-19 was associated with a 29.5% reduction in SWL and a 7.9% and 5.4% increase in URS and NT use, respectively. Hospital admissions for RC increased by 10.9%, while ICU admissions decreased by 25% during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RC incidence and intervention rates were similar before and during the pandemic; however, patient demographics and morbidity differed. Understanding these trends can inform protocols for streamlining care in response to analogous strains on publicly funded healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We examined the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of kidney stone acute care visits and interventions.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study using linked administrative healthcare data in the province of Ontario, Canada. We included all patients who, between March 1, 2018, and September 30, 2021, presented to an emergency department (ED) or were admitted to hospital with renal colic (RC), as well as patients who underwent stenting, nephrostomy tube (NT) insertion, shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy (URS), or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Using univariate and multivariable analyses, outcomes of interest were compared before and after the onset of COVID-19.

Results: Our cohort included 149 006 unique patients; there were 74 994 pre- vs. 94 067 peri-COVID RC episodes (p=0.74). Peri-pandemic patients were more likely to be sicker, women, and from marginalized communities. Mean time from temporizing to definitive intervention increased in the first three months of the pandemic (17.9 vs. 32 days), but no statistically significant effect on the overall proportion of patients undergoing definitive intervention was observed. The onset of COVID-19 was associated with a 29.5% reduction in SWL and a 7.9% and 5.4% increase in URS and NT use, respectively. Hospital admissions for RC increased by 10.9%, while ICU admissions decreased by 25% during the pandemic.

Conclusions: RC incidence and intervention rates were similar before and during the pandemic; however, patient demographics and morbidity differed. Understanding these trends can inform protocols for streamlining care in response to analogous strains on publicly funded healthcare systems.

COVID-19大流行对单一付款人系统肾结石管理的影响。
前言:我们研究了COVID-19大流行对肾结石急性护理就诊和干预措施发生率的影响。方法:我们在加拿大安大略省进行了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,使用相关的行政保健数据。我们纳入了2018年3月1日至2021年9月30日期间因肾绞痛(RC)就诊或住院的所有患者,以及接受支架植入、肾造口管(NT)插入、冲击波碎石术(SWL)、输尿管镜检查(URS)或经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的患者。采用单变量和多变量分析,比较了COVID-19发病前后的相关结果。结果:我们的队列包括149 006例独特患者;有74 994例术前RC发作vs. 94 067例围covid - 19期RC发作(p=0.74)。大流行期间的患者更有可能是病情较重的女性,以及来自边缘社区的患者。在大流行的前三个月,从暂时干预到最终干预的平均时间增加了(17.9天对32天),但对接受最终干预的患者的总体比例没有观察到统计学上显著的影响。COVID-19的发病与SWL减少29.5%、URS和NT使用分别增加7.9%和5.4%相关。在大流行期间,RC住院人数增加了10.9%,而ICU住院人数减少了25%。结论:大流行前和大流行期间,RC发病率和干预率相似;然而,患者人口统计学和发病率有所不同。了解这些趋势可以为简化护理方案提供信息,以应对公共资助的医疗保健系统的类似压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信