Increasing medical complexity among inpatients in urology over time: A comparative retrospective chart review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Liam Power, Kaveh Masoumi-Ravandi, Gabriella Ilie, Andrea Lantz Powers, Ross Mason, Ashley Cox
{"title":"Increasing medical complexity among inpatients in urology over time: A comparative retrospective chart review.","authors":"Liam Power, Kaveh Masoumi-Ravandi, Gabriella Ilie, Andrea Lantz Powers, Ross Mason, Ashley Cox","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate temporal trends in the medical complexity of urologic inpatients and investigate their implications for clinical care delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective comparative chart review was conducted for urologic inpatients admitted to a tertiary care center during two time periods: 2006-2007 and 2019-2020. A random sample of 150 patient charts from each cohort (N=300) was analyzed using a structured data extraction protocol in REDCap. Indicators of medical complexity included comorbidities, polypharmacy, and healthcare resource utilization. Statistical analyses comprised independent-samples t-tests, logistic regression, and multiple linear regression modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 300 patient records revealed a significant increase in medical complexity in the contemporary cohort compared to the historical cohort. Patients admitted in 2019-2020 exhibited higher Charlson comorbidity index scores, a greater number of chronic conditions, and increased polypharmacy. Utilization of home care services and specialist consultations during hospitalization was also more prevalent in the contemporary cohort. Although length of stay (LOS) remained comparable between cohorts, open abdominal surgery and the number of prescription medications were significant predictors of prolonged LOS (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The medical complexity of urologic inpatients has escalated over time, driven by increased comorbid burden and healthcare system interactions. Despite advances in surgical techniques that would traditionally reduce LOS, these improvements may be counterbalanced by the growing complexity of patient populations. Interventions such as pre-admission optimization and integrated multidisciplinary care are essential to address the challenges posed by this evolving clinical landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate temporal trends in the medical complexity of urologic inpatients and investigate their implications for clinical care delivery.

Methods: A retrospective comparative chart review was conducted for urologic inpatients admitted to a tertiary care center during two time periods: 2006-2007 and 2019-2020. A random sample of 150 patient charts from each cohort (N=300) was analyzed using a structured data extraction protocol in REDCap. Indicators of medical complexity included comorbidities, polypharmacy, and healthcare resource utilization. Statistical analyses comprised independent-samples t-tests, logistic regression, and multiple linear regression modeling.

Results: Analysis of 300 patient records revealed a significant increase in medical complexity in the contemporary cohort compared to the historical cohort. Patients admitted in 2019-2020 exhibited higher Charlson comorbidity index scores, a greater number of chronic conditions, and increased polypharmacy. Utilization of home care services and specialist consultations during hospitalization was also more prevalent in the contemporary cohort. Although length of stay (LOS) remained comparable between cohorts, open abdominal surgery and the number of prescription medications were significant predictors of prolonged LOS (p<0.05).

Conclusions: The medical complexity of urologic inpatients has escalated over time, driven by increased comorbid burden and healthcare system interactions. Despite advances in surgical techniques that would traditionally reduce LOS, these improvements may be counterbalanced by the growing complexity of patient populations. Interventions such as pre-admission optimization and integrated multidisciplinary care are essential to address the challenges posed by this evolving clinical landscape.

随着时间的推移,泌尿科住院患者的医疗复杂性不断增加:一项比较回顾性图表回顾。
简介:本研究旨在评估泌尿科住院患者医疗复杂性的时间趋势,并探讨其对临床护理的影响。方法:对2006-2007年和2019-2020年两个时期在某三级保健中心住院的泌尿科患者进行回顾性比较图表回顾。使用REDCap中的结构化数据提取方案,从每个队列(N=300)随机抽取150例患者图表进行分析。医疗复杂性指标包括合并症、多种用药和医疗资源利用。统计分析包括独立样本t检验、逻辑回归和多元线性回归模型。结果:对300例患者记录的分析显示,与历史队列相比,当代队列的医疗复杂性显着增加。2019-2020年入院的患者表现出更高的Charlson合并症指数评分、更多的慢性疾病和更多的多重用药。在当代队列中,住院期间使用家庭护理服务和专家咨询的情况也更为普遍。虽然住院时间(LOS)在队列之间保持可比性,但腹部开腹手术和处方药物数量是延长LOS的重要预测因素(结论:泌尿科住院患者的医疗复杂性随着时间的推移而升级,这是由合并症负担和医疗系统相互作用增加所驱动的。尽管手术技术的进步传统上可以降低LOS,但这些改进可能会被患者群体日益复杂的情况所抵消。诸如入院前优化和综合多学科护理等干预措施对于解决这一不断变化的临床环境所带来的挑战至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信