The Coexistence of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Positive Childhood Experiences, and Parent-Reported Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Severity: National Survey of Children's Health.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Suk-Joon Hong, My H Vu, Douglas Vanderbilt, Larry Yin, Karen Kay Imagawa, Alexis Deavenport-Saman
{"title":"The Coexistence of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Positive Childhood Experiences, and Parent-Reported Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Severity: National Survey of Children's Health.","authors":"Suk-Joon Hong, My H Vu, Douglas Vanderbilt, Larry Yin, Karen Kay Imagawa, Alexis Deavenport-Saman","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Children with higher adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) experience more severe parent-reported attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Positive childhood experiences (PCEs) help to build resilience and mitigate the impact of ACEs on ADHD. Prior studies have measured the 2 constructs as independent factors, but no research has examined their combined influence on children with ADHD. The first aim was to categorize children with different levels of parent-reported ADHD severity into classes based on shared characteristics of ACE and PCE promoters. The second aim was to examine the relationship between the classes and ADHD severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included children 6 to 17 years with data on the 2019 National Survey of Children's Health ADHD severity questionnaire (n = 19,715; weighted n = 49,149,269). Latent class analysis (LCA) identified subgroups of children experiencing patterns among PCE promoters and ACEs, which were measured as independent variables in an adjusted ordinal regression model to estimate their composite effects on ADHD severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using LCA, one class belonging to children with low ACEs and high PCE promoters (class 1) and another belonging to children with high ACEs and low PCE promoters (class 2) were identified. Class 2 was 2.2 times more likely to have more severe ADHD (aOR 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest ACEs and PCE promoters do not operate independently; children with high ACEs had low PCE promoters and had more severe parent-reported ADHD. Clinicians should consider actively screening for the presence of ACEs and PCEs in all children, especially those with high ADHD severity, and build strong alliances with families.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Children with higher adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) experience more severe parent-reported attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Positive childhood experiences (PCEs) help to build resilience and mitigate the impact of ACEs on ADHD. Prior studies have measured the 2 constructs as independent factors, but no research has examined their combined influence on children with ADHD. The first aim was to categorize children with different levels of parent-reported ADHD severity into classes based on shared characteristics of ACE and PCE promoters. The second aim was to examine the relationship between the classes and ADHD severity.

Methods: Participants included children 6 to 17 years with data on the 2019 National Survey of Children's Health ADHD severity questionnaire (n = 19,715; weighted n = 49,149,269). Latent class analysis (LCA) identified subgroups of children experiencing patterns among PCE promoters and ACEs, which were measured as independent variables in an adjusted ordinal regression model to estimate their composite effects on ADHD severity.

Results: Using LCA, one class belonging to children with low ACEs and high PCE promoters (class 1) and another belonging to children with high ACEs and low PCE promoters (class 2) were identified. Class 2 was 2.2 times more likely to have more severe ADHD (aOR 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.6).

Conclusion: Findings suggest ACEs and PCE promoters do not operate independently; children with high ACEs had low PCE promoters and had more severe parent-reported ADHD. Clinicians should consider actively screening for the presence of ACEs and PCEs in all children, especially those with high ADHD severity, and build strong alliances with families.

不良童年经历、积极童年经历和父母报告的注意缺陷/多动障碍严重程度的共存:全国儿童健康调查
目的:童年不良经历(ace)越高的儿童,其父母报告的注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)越严重。积极的童年经历(pce)有助于建立弹性,减轻ace对ADHD的影响。之前的研究将这两种结构作为独立的因素来衡量,但没有研究考察它们对多动症儿童的综合影响。第一个目的是根据ACE和PCE启动子的共同特征,对父母报告的不同程度的ADHD严重程度的儿童进行分类。第二个目的是检查班级和ADHD严重程度之间的关系。方法:参与者包括6至17岁的儿童,数据来自2019年全国儿童健康调查ADHD严重程度问卷(n = 19,715;加权n = 49,149,269)。潜类分析(LCA)确定了在PCE启动子和ace中经历模式的儿童亚组,并在调整的有序回归模型中作为独立变量进行测量,以估计它们对ADHD严重程度的综合影响。结果:采用LCA方法,将低ace、高PCE启动子患儿分为1类,将高ace、低PCE启动子患儿分为2类。2类儿童出现严重ADHD的可能性是其他儿童的2.2倍(aOR 2.2;95%置信区间为1.8-2.6)。结论:ace和PCE启动子并非独立作用;高ace儿童的PCE促进因子较低,父母报告的ADHD更严重。临床医生应考虑在所有儿童中积极筛查ace和pce的存在,特别是那些ADHD严重程度较高的儿童,并与家庭建立牢固的联盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信