Maxim QA efficiency and accuracy.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Dean Wallace, Mikel Byrne, Kelvin Hiscoke, Trent Aland
{"title":"Maxim QA efficiency and accuracy.","authors":"Dean Wallace, Mikel Byrne, Kelvin Hiscoke, Trent Aland","doi":"10.1007/s13246-025-01589-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are several commercial quality assurance (QA) software solutions for use in radiotherapy, but currently none are fully integrated with the existing c-arm linear accelerators. MaximQA (Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Palo Alto, CA) is a solution that integrates with both the TrueBeam and Halcyon linacs to capture and analyse QA tasks automatically. Currently the software supports a limited number of tests for the Halcyon and TrueBeam, including CBCT for both linacs, dynamic multi-leaf collimator tests (DMLC) for TrueBeam, and the Winston-Lutz test for Halcyon. This study investigates the efficiency gains of an integrated QA system compared to non-integrated QA software and evaluates its accuracy against another commercial product, DoseLab (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA). Efficiency was assessed through a timing study by measuring the time required for CBCT, Winston-Lutz, and DMLC QA tasks in MaximQA and DoseLab. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing analysis results for the same tests in both software packages. The timing study showed that the integrated system substantially reduced QA task duration. A single CBCT QA analysis was 1 to 3 min faster, while DMLC and Winston-Lutz tests each saved 3 to 5 min excluding any export of images required. Comparison of analysis results indicated similar outcomes for most parameters, though some variations arose due to differences in calculation methodologies. Overall, the use of an integrated QA program decreased the time required to undertake these tests while maintaining high accuracy when compared to a previously established QA product.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1351-1357"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01589-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are several commercial quality assurance (QA) software solutions for use in radiotherapy, but currently none are fully integrated with the existing c-arm linear accelerators. MaximQA (Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Palo Alto, CA) is a solution that integrates with both the TrueBeam and Halcyon linacs to capture and analyse QA tasks automatically. Currently the software supports a limited number of tests for the Halcyon and TrueBeam, including CBCT for both linacs, dynamic multi-leaf collimator tests (DMLC) for TrueBeam, and the Winston-Lutz test for Halcyon. This study investigates the efficiency gains of an integrated QA system compared to non-integrated QA software and evaluates its accuracy against another commercial product, DoseLab (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA). Efficiency was assessed through a timing study by measuring the time required for CBCT, Winston-Lutz, and DMLC QA tasks in MaximQA and DoseLab. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing analysis results for the same tests in both software packages. The timing study showed that the integrated system substantially reduced QA task duration. A single CBCT QA analysis was 1 to 3 min faster, while DMLC and Winston-Lutz tests each saved 3 to 5 min excluding any export of images required. Comparison of analysis results indicated similar outcomes for most parameters, though some variations arose due to differences in calculation methodologies. Overall, the use of an integrated QA program decreased the time required to undertake these tests while maintaining high accuracy when compared to a previously established QA product.

Maxim QA效率和准确性。
有几个商业质量保证(QA)软件解决方案用于放射治疗,但目前没有一个与现有的c臂线性加速器完全集成。MaximQA (Varian医疗系统公司)Palo Alto, CA)是一个集成了TrueBeam和Halcyon linacs的解决方案,可以自动捕获和分析QA任务。目前,该软件支持Halcyon和TrueBeam的有限数量的测试,包括用于直线机的CBCT,用于TrueBeam的动态多叶准直器测试(DMLC)和用于Halcyon的Winston-Lutz测试。本研究调查了集成QA系统与非集成QA软件相比的效率增益,并评估了其与另一种商业产品DoseLab (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA)的准确性。通过在MaximQA和DoseLab中测量CBCT、Winston-Lutz和DMLC QA任务所需的时间来评估效率。通过比较两个软件包中相同测试的分析结果来评估准确性。时间研究表明,集成系统大大缩短了QA任务的持续时间。单个CBCT QA分析速度快1至3分钟,而DMLC和Winston-Lutz测试分别节省3至5分钟,不包括所需的任何图像导出。分析结果的比较表明,大多数参数的结果相似,但由于计算方法的差异,会产生一些差异。总的来说,与以前建立的QA产品相比,使用集成的QA程序减少了进行这些测试所需的时间,同时保持了较高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信