{"title":"Data-Driven Decision-Making in Adult Protective Services: Insights from the Identification, Services, and Outcomes (ISO) Matrix Implementation.","authors":"Jarmin Yeh, Rebecca Parks, Pi-Ju Liu","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2025.2528585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elder abuse and neglect affect approximately 10% of Americans over age 60, with incidences rising as the population ages. Outcomes depend on frontline Adult Protective Services (APS) professionals' interpretation and implementation of policies and protocols, with historical reliance on subjective judgment causing variation in case handling. APS faces growing challenges including increasing case volumes, insufficient funding, and inconsistent practices. Recent improvement efforts have focused on structured decision-making tools and data analytics like the Identification, Services, and Outcomes (ISO) Matrix, designed to integrate empirical data collection with practice. This qualitative study examined ISO Matrix implementation in two APS programs in a West Coast state, analyzing APS professionals' experiences through focus groups. The analysis revealed tensions during the transition to standardized, data-driven decision-making, including optimism about using data to secure funding, challenges balancing standardized practices with complex case realities, staff-developed workarounds, and technological pitfalls. Findings highlight the need for greater flexibility in standardized tools to accommodate nuanced decision-making and emphasize humanizing approaches to technological innovation. By incorporating insights from frontline APS professionals, informatics systems can simultaneously serve institutional objectives by balancing administrative burdens with client needs while preserving professional discretion and enhancing accountability in safeguarding vulnerable older adults from abuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2025.2528585","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Elder abuse and neglect affect approximately 10% of Americans over age 60, with incidences rising as the population ages. Outcomes depend on frontline Adult Protective Services (APS) professionals' interpretation and implementation of policies and protocols, with historical reliance on subjective judgment causing variation in case handling. APS faces growing challenges including increasing case volumes, insufficient funding, and inconsistent practices. Recent improvement efforts have focused on structured decision-making tools and data analytics like the Identification, Services, and Outcomes (ISO) Matrix, designed to integrate empirical data collection with practice. This qualitative study examined ISO Matrix implementation in two APS programs in a West Coast state, analyzing APS professionals' experiences through focus groups. The analysis revealed tensions during the transition to standardized, data-driven decision-making, including optimism about using data to secure funding, challenges balancing standardized practices with complex case realities, staff-developed workarounds, and technological pitfalls. Findings highlight the need for greater flexibility in standardized tools to accommodate nuanced decision-making and emphasize humanizing approaches to technological innovation. By incorporating insights from frontline APS professionals, informatics systems can simultaneously serve institutional objectives by balancing administrative burdens with client needs while preserving professional discretion and enhancing accountability in safeguarding vulnerable older adults from abuse.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim.
The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.