Data-Driven Decision-Making in Adult Protective Services: Insights from the Identification, Services, and Outcomes (ISO) Matrix Implementation.

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Jarmin Yeh, Rebecca Parks, Pi-Ju Liu
{"title":"Data-Driven Decision-Making in Adult Protective Services: Insights from the Identification, Services, and Outcomes (ISO) Matrix Implementation.","authors":"Jarmin Yeh, Rebecca Parks, Pi-Ju Liu","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2025.2528585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elder abuse and neglect affect approximately 10% of Americans over age 60, with incidences rising as the population ages. Outcomes depend on frontline Adult Protective Services (APS) professionals' interpretation and implementation of policies and protocols, with historical reliance on subjective judgment causing variation in case handling. APS faces growing challenges including increasing case volumes, insufficient funding, and inconsistent practices. Recent improvement efforts have focused on structured decision-making tools and data analytics like the Identification, Services, and Outcomes (ISO) Matrix, designed to integrate empirical data collection with practice. This qualitative study examined ISO Matrix implementation in two APS programs in a West Coast state, analyzing APS professionals' experiences through focus groups. The analysis revealed tensions during the transition to standardized, data-driven decision-making, including optimism about using data to secure funding, challenges balancing standardized practices with complex case realities, staff-developed workarounds, and technological pitfalls. Findings highlight the need for greater flexibility in standardized tools to accommodate nuanced decision-making and emphasize humanizing approaches to technological innovation. By incorporating insights from frontline APS professionals, informatics systems can simultaneously serve institutional objectives by balancing administrative burdens with client needs while preserving professional discretion and enhancing accountability in safeguarding vulnerable older adults from abuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2025.2528585","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elder abuse and neglect affect approximately 10% of Americans over age 60, with incidences rising as the population ages. Outcomes depend on frontline Adult Protective Services (APS) professionals' interpretation and implementation of policies and protocols, with historical reliance on subjective judgment causing variation in case handling. APS faces growing challenges including increasing case volumes, insufficient funding, and inconsistent practices. Recent improvement efforts have focused on structured decision-making tools and data analytics like the Identification, Services, and Outcomes (ISO) Matrix, designed to integrate empirical data collection with practice. This qualitative study examined ISO Matrix implementation in two APS programs in a West Coast state, analyzing APS professionals' experiences through focus groups. The analysis revealed tensions during the transition to standardized, data-driven decision-making, including optimism about using data to secure funding, challenges balancing standardized practices with complex case realities, staff-developed workarounds, and technological pitfalls. Findings highlight the need for greater flexibility in standardized tools to accommodate nuanced decision-making and emphasize humanizing approaches to technological innovation. By incorporating insights from frontline APS professionals, informatics systems can simultaneously serve institutional objectives by balancing administrative burdens with client needs while preserving professional discretion and enhancing accountability in safeguarding vulnerable older adults from abuse.

成人保护服务中的数据驱动决策:来自识别、服务和结果(ISO)矩阵实施的见解。
在60岁以上的美国人中,虐待和忽视老人的比例约为10%,随着人口老龄化,这一比例还在上升。结果取决于一线成人保护服务(APS)专业人员对政策和协议的解释和实施,历史上对主观判断的依赖导致案件处理的变化。APS面临越来越多的挑战,包括病例数量增加、资金不足和做法不一致。最近的改进工作集中在结构化决策工具和数据分析上,如识别、服务和结果(ISO)矩阵,旨在将经验数据收集与实践相结合。本定性研究考察了ISO矩阵在西海岸州的两个APS项目中的实施情况,通过焦点小组分析了APS专业人员的经验。分析揭示了在向标准化、数据驱动的决策过渡期间的紧张局势,包括对利用数据获得资金的乐观态度、平衡标准化实践与复杂案例现实的挑战、员工开发的变通方法以及技术陷阱。研究结果强调了标准化工具需要更大的灵活性,以适应细微的决策,并强调技术创新的人性化方法。通过结合一线APS专业人员的见解,信息系统可以同时通过平衡行政负担和客户需求来实现机构目标,同时保留专业自由裁量权并加强保护弱势老年人免受虐待的问责制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim. The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信