Effect of Interdisciplinary Discharge Programme on Daily Function, Quality of Life, and Pain Intensity in Patients Undergoing Joint Replacement Surgery.

IF 1.5 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Mohamad Ghasempour, Aliasghar Alamian, Alireza Amanollahi, Shideh Badeleh, Soolmaz Moosavi
{"title":"Effect of Interdisciplinary Discharge Programme on Daily Function, Quality of Life, and Pain Intensity in Patients Undergoing Joint Replacement Surgery.","authors":"Mohamad Ghasempour, Aliasghar Alamian, Alireza Amanollahi, Shideh Badeleh, Soolmaz Moosavi","doi":"10.1002/msc.70160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Osteoarthritis is a common cause of pain and disability, especially in adults over 65 years of age, with hip and knee joints most frequently affected. While total hip and knee arthroplasties are effective treatments for advanced cases, patients often face postoperative complications and challenges in resuming daily activities. Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) has shown potential to improve outcomes but remains underutilised in some settings, including Iran. This study aimed to assess the impact of an interprofessional discharge programme on quality of life, daily functioning and pain in patients undergoing hip and knee replacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this quasi-experimental study, 90 patients aged ≥ 50 years undergoing primary unilateral hip or knee replacement in Tehran (2024) were randomly assigned to intervention or control groups. The intervention group received an IPC-based discharge programme and the control group received routine care. Outcomes were measured preoperatively and after one and three months postoperatively using SF-36, Numerical Rating Scale, Harris Hip Score, and Knee Outcome Survey-ADLS. Data were analysed using linear mixed models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between groups in any outcome measures or surgery types at one or 3 months postoperatively (p > 0.05). However, the intervention group showed significantly improved daily functioning at 3 months (p = 0.01 for hip; p = 0.05 for knee). BMI was significantly associated with daily functioning after knee surgery (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The interprofessional discharge programme had limited impact, with only modest improvement in daily functioning. Individual factors, including BMI, should be considered in future postoperative care planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"23 3","pages":"e70160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoarthritis is a common cause of pain and disability, especially in adults over 65 years of age, with hip and knee joints most frequently affected. While total hip and knee arthroplasties are effective treatments for advanced cases, patients often face postoperative complications and challenges in resuming daily activities. Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) has shown potential to improve outcomes but remains underutilised in some settings, including Iran. This study aimed to assess the impact of an interprofessional discharge programme on quality of life, daily functioning and pain in patients undergoing hip and knee replacement.

Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, 90 patients aged ≥ 50 years undergoing primary unilateral hip or knee replacement in Tehran (2024) were randomly assigned to intervention or control groups. The intervention group received an IPC-based discharge programme and the control group received routine care. Outcomes were measured preoperatively and after one and three months postoperatively using SF-36, Numerical Rating Scale, Harris Hip Score, and Knee Outcome Survey-ADLS. Data were analysed using linear mixed models.

Results: No significant differences were found between groups in any outcome measures or surgery types at one or 3 months postoperatively (p > 0.05). However, the intervention group showed significantly improved daily functioning at 3 months (p = 0.01 for hip; p = 0.05 for knee). BMI was significantly associated with daily functioning after knee surgery (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The interprofessional discharge programme had limited impact, with only modest improvement in daily functioning. Individual factors, including BMI, should be considered in future postoperative care planning.

交叉学科出院方案对关节置换术患者日常功能、生活质量和疼痛强度的影响。
骨关节炎是疼痛和残疾的常见原因,尤其是在65岁以上的成年人中,髋关节和膝关节最常受到影响。虽然全髋关节和膝关节置换术是晚期病例的有效治疗方法,但患者经常面临术后并发症和恢复日常活动的挑战。跨专业合作(IPC)已显示出改善结果的潜力,但在包括伊朗在内的一些环境中仍未得到充分利用。本研究旨在评估跨专业出院方案对髋关节和膝关节置换术患者的生活质量、日常功能和疼痛的影响。方法:在这项准实验研究中,90例年龄≥50岁的患者在德黑兰(2024年)接受了原发性单侧髋关节或膝关节置换术,随机分为干预组和对照组。干预组接受基于ipcc的出院方案,对照组接受常规护理。采用SF-36、数值评定量表、Harris髋关节评分和膝关节结局调查- adls对术前和术后1个月和3个月的结果进行测量。数据采用线性混合模型进行分析。结果:两组患者术后1个月、3个月的转归指标及手术类型差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。然而,干预组在3个月时的日常功能明显改善(髋部p = 0.01;膝关节P = 0.05)。BMI与膝关节手术后的日常功能显著相关(p结论:跨专业出院方案影响有限,日常功能只有适度改善。在未来的术后护理计划中应考虑个体因素,包括BMI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书