Study of abortion material in idiopathic habitual miscarriage of pregnancy: Literature review.

Q3 Medicine
Aigerim Sadyrbekova, Gulnara Svyatova, Galina Berezina, Roza Suleimenova, Alexandra Murtazaliyeva
{"title":"Study of abortion material in idiopathic habitual miscarriage of pregnancy: Literature review.","authors":"Aigerim Sadyrbekova, Gulnara Svyatova, Galina Berezina, Roza Suleimenova, Alexandra Murtazaliyeva","doi":"10.36740/Merkur202503117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim: The study aims to review current scientific publications on the genetic study of foetal material in habitual miscarriage with an emphasis on a comparative analysis of the methods used traditional karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis. The material in this paper is based on an analysis of scientific publications covering the issues under study over the past five years.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: This study reviewed cytogenetic diagnostic methods for detecting genetic abnormalities in foetal material from recurrent miscarriages. A comparative analysis of the widely used methods, karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), was conducted to assess their strengths and limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: Given its superior diagnostic capabilities, CMA should be adopted as the first-line method for investigating genetic abnormalities in cases of habitual miscarriage. Its ability to detect a wider range of chromosomal abnormalities allows for more accurate diagnosis and better-informed clinical decisions. The use of CMA in routine practice can significantly improve the management of future pregnancies, offering couples a greater chance of successful outcomes and providing reproductive health specialists with a more reliable tool for evaluating repeated pregnancy loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":39518,"journal":{"name":"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski","volume":"53 3","pages":"409-417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/Merkur202503117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Aim: The study aims to review current scientific publications on the genetic study of foetal material in habitual miscarriage with an emphasis on a comparative analysis of the methods used traditional karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis. The material in this paper is based on an analysis of scientific publications covering the issues under study over the past five years.

Patients and methods: Materials and Methods: This study reviewed cytogenetic diagnostic methods for detecting genetic abnormalities in foetal material from recurrent miscarriages. A comparative analysis of the widely used methods, karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), was conducted to assess their strengths and limitations.

Conclusion: Conclusions: Given its superior diagnostic capabilities, CMA should be adopted as the first-line method for investigating genetic abnormalities in cases of habitual miscarriage. Its ability to detect a wider range of chromosomal abnormalities allows for more accurate diagnosis and better-informed clinical decisions. The use of CMA in routine practice can significantly improve the management of future pregnancies, offering couples a greater chance of successful outcomes and providing reproductive health specialists with a more reliable tool for evaluating repeated pregnancy loss.

特发性习惯性流产流产材料的研究:文献综述。
目的:回顾近年来有关习惯性流产胎儿遗传研究的文献,重点对传统染色体核型分析方法和染色体微阵列分析方法进行比较分析。本文中的材料是基于对过去五年中所研究问题的科学出版物的分析。患者和方法:材料和方法:本研究综述了用于检测复发性流产胎儿材料遗传异常的细胞遗传学诊断方法。比较分析了常用的核型分析和染色体微阵列分析(CMA)方法,以评估其优势和局限性。结论:CMA具有较强的诊断能力,可作为习惯性流产遗传异常的一线检查方法。它能够检测到更广泛的染色体异常,从而实现更准确的诊断和更明智的临床决策。在常规实践中使用CMA可以显著改善对未来妊娠的管理,为夫妇提供更大的成功结果机会,并为生殖健康专家提供更可靠的工具来评估重复妊娠损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski
Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信