Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Pediatric Hospital Medicine: A National Survey.

Q1 Nursing
Kevin Weinberger, Mary Esther M Rocha, Colleen Keough, Shelley Kumar, Ricardo Quinonez, Erik Su, Adam Cohen
{"title":"Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Pediatric Hospital Medicine: A National Survey.","authors":"Kevin Weinberger, Mary Esther M Rocha, Colleen Keough, Shelley Kumar, Ricardo Quinonez, Erik Su, Adam Cohen","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2024-008287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the current use, barriers, facilitators, and clinical applications of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) within pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) groups across the United States, aiming to identify opportunities for broader implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Setting (PRIS) Network, we conducted an anonymous, multicenter, cross-sectional survey targeting PHM groups in both academic children's hospitals and community settings. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to identify the proportion of PHM divisions using POCUS, the associated characteristics of these groups, their current POCUS applications, and the barriers and facilitators for POCUS implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 97 sites surveyed, 56% (n = 54) responded. Of these, 17% (n = 9) reported having a POCUS program. There was no significant difference in POCUS implementation among PHM divisions concerning geographic location, practice setting, number of beds, or faculty. Programs utilizing POCUS identified the following as principle uses: diagnosis of pleural effusions, pneumonia, pericardial effusions, bladder volume, and skin and soft tissue infections and performance of lumbar punctures. Among PHM groups with a POCUS program, 100% had a trained POCUS leader, 78% had dedicated equipment for their division, and 67% had available institutional training for their PHM group. The top barriers identified by PHM groups without a POCUS program included a lack of local POCUS experts, lack of equipment, and cost of equipment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In 2024, more than 1 in 6 PHM divisions responding to this survey actively incorporated POCUS in the care of patients. These applications are diverse and applicable across common inpatient diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2024-008287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the current use, barriers, facilitators, and clinical applications of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) within pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) groups across the United States, aiming to identify opportunities for broader implementation.

Methods: Using the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Setting (PRIS) Network, we conducted an anonymous, multicenter, cross-sectional survey targeting PHM groups in both academic children's hospitals and community settings. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to identify the proportion of PHM divisions using POCUS, the associated characteristics of these groups, their current POCUS applications, and the barriers and facilitators for POCUS implementation.

Results: Of the 97 sites surveyed, 56% (n = 54) responded. Of these, 17% (n = 9) reported having a POCUS program. There was no significant difference in POCUS implementation among PHM divisions concerning geographic location, practice setting, number of beds, or faculty. Programs utilizing POCUS identified the following as principle uses: diagnosis of pleural effusions, pneumonia, pericardial effusions, bladder volume, and skin and soft tissue infections and performance of lumbar punctures. Among PHM groups with a POCUS program, 100% had a trained POCUS leader, 78% had dedicated equipment for their division, and 67% had available institutional training for their PHM group. The top barriers identified by PHM groups without a POCUS program included a lack of local POCUS experts, lack of equipment, and cost of equipment.

Conclusion: In 2024, more than 1 in 6 PHM divisions responding to this survey actively incorporated POCUS in the care of patients. These applications are diverse and applicable across common inpatient diagnoses.

儿科医院医学点护理超声:一项全国性调查。
目的:评估美国儿科医院医学(PHM)小组中即时超声检查(POCUS)的使用现状、障碍、促进因素和临床应用,旨在确定更广泛实施的机会。方法:利用住院儿科研究(PRIS)网络,我们针对学术儿童医院和社区环境中的PHM群体进行了一项匿名、多中心、横断面调查。使用描述性和推断性统计来确定PHM部门使用POCUS的比例,这些群体的相关特征,他们目前的POCUS应用,以及实施POCUS的障碍和促进因素。结果:在调查的97个站点中,56% (n = 54)做出了回应。其中,17% (n = 9)报告有POCUS计划。在地理位置、实践环境、床位数量或教师方面,PHM各科室在POCUS实施方面没有显著差异。利用POCUS的项目确定了以下主要用途:诊断胸腔积液、肺炎、心包积液、膀胱容量、皮肤和软组织感染以及腰椎穿刺。在拥有POCUS项目的PHM团队中,100%的团队拥有训练有素的POCUS领导者,78%的团队拥有专用设备,67%的PHM团队拥有可用的机构培训。没有POCUS项目的PHM集团认为,最大的障碍包括缺乏当地的POCUS专家、缺乏设备和设备成本。结论:2024年,超过1 / 6的PHM部门积极将POCUS纳入患者护理。这些应用程序是多种多样的,适用于常见的住院诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信