Prioritizing relieving iliac venous compression contributes to treating varicose veins of lower extremities patients with May-Thurner syndrome.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1177/17085381251360068
Meng-Jie Shi, Xi Yuan, Yan Yan, Rui-Peng Zhang, Fei Liu, Shi-Cai He, Hui Wang
{"title":"Prioritizing relieving iliac venous compression contributes to treating varicose veins of lower extremities patients with May-Thurner syndrome.","authors":"Meng-Jie Shi, Xi Yuan, Yan Yan, Rui-Peng Zhang, Fei Liu, Shi-Cai He, Hui Wang","doi":"10.1177/17085381251360068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveWe suspect that the May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) is the main etiology of secondary varicose veins of the lower extremities (VVLE). However, there is no definitive agreement on the priority and necessity of relieving iliac vein compression when treating patients with VVLE and MTS.MethodIn this study, according to the results of anterograde venography of lower extremity, 99 patients were divided into two groups, namely, simple VVLE (<i>n</i> = 66) and VVLE-MTS groups (<i>n</i> = 33). The patients in the former group only received sclerotherapy, while the patients in later group received the combination treatments of intravascular balloon dilatation, stent placement of iliac vein, and sclerotherapy. After surgery, we applied VVCS score, postoperative recanalization rate, and improvement in clinical symptom to assess therapeutic effects.ResultsVCSS score: At 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after operation, there were significant differences between group A and group B (<i>p</i> < 0.01), the difference of VCSS: compared with preoperation, there was statistical difference between group A and group B at 1 week after operation (<i>p</i> < 0.01), there was no statistical difference 6 months after operation (<i>p</i> = 0.052); Postoperative recanalization: cumulative trunk recanalization events 6 months after surgery There was no statistical difference between (<i>p</i> = 0.192) and branch recanalization events (<i>p</i> = 0.207). When the two events were combined to increase the positive rate, no statistical difference was found. However, after stratifying patients, mild (CEAP2-3) and moderate (CEAP4) patients were obtained. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of recanalization events between the two groups, but there was a statistical difference between severe (CEAP5-6) groups (<i>p</i> = 0.025).ConclusionIt was great of importance and necessity of solving iliac vein compression prior to treating VVLE when handling patients with VVLE and MTS, especially for the cases with high CEAP score.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"17085381251360068"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381251360068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveWe suspect that the May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) is the main etiology of secondary varicose veins of the lower extremities (VVLE). However, there is no definitive agreement on the priority and necessity of relieving iliac vein compression when treating patients with VVLE and MTS.MethodIn this study, according to the results of anterograde venography of lower extremity, 99 patients were divided into two groups, namely, simple VVLE (n = 66) and VVLE-MTS groups (n = 33). The patients in the former group only received sclerotherapy, while the patients in later group received the combination treatments of intravascular balloon dilatation, stent placement of iliac vein, and sclerotherapy. After surgery, we applied VVCS score, postoperative recanalization rate, and improvement in clinical symptom to assess therapeutic effects.ResultsVCSS score: At 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after operation, there were significant differences between group A and group B (p < 0.01), the difference of VCSS: compared with preoperation, there was statistical difference between group A and group B at 1 week after operation (p < 0.01), there was no statistical difference 6 months after operation (p = 0.052); Postoperative recanalization: cumulative trunk recanalization events 6 months after surgery There was no statistical difference between (p = 0.192) and branch recanalization events (p = 0.207). When the two events were combined to increase the positive rate, no statistical difference was found. However, after stratifying patients, mild (CEAP2-3) and moderate (CEAP4) patients were obtained. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of recanalization events between the two groups, but there was a statistical difference between severe (CEAP5-6) groups (p = 0.025).ConclusionIt was great of importance and necessity of solving iliac vein compression prior to treating VVLE when handling patients with VVLE and MTS, especially for the cases with high CEAP score.

优先缓解髂静脉压迫有助于治疗May-Thurner综合征下肢静脉曲张患者。
目的我们怀疑May-Thurner综合征(MTS)是继发性下肢静脉曲张(vle)的主要病因。方法本研究根据下肢顺行静脉造影结果,将99例患者分为单纯VVLE组(n = 66)和VVLE- mts组(n = 33)。前一组患者仅接受硬化治疗,后一组患者接受血管内球囊扩张+髂静脉支架置入术+硬化治疗的联合治疗。术后应用VVCS评分、术后再通率、临床症状改善情况评价治疗效果。结果VCSS评分:术后1周、1个月、3个月、6个月A组与B组比较,差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.01);术后1周A组与B组比较,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01),术后6个月比较,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.052);术后主干再通事件:术后6个月累积主干再通事件p = 0.192与分支再通事件p = 0.207无统计学差异。当这两个事件结合起来增加阳性率时,没有发现统计学差异。然而,在对患者进行分层后,获得了轻度(CEAP2-3)和中度(CEAP4)患者。两组再通事件发生率无统计学差异,重度组(CEAP5-6)间有统计学差异(p = 0.025)。结论在处理VVLE合并MTS患者,特别是CEAP评分较高的病例时,治疗前解决髂静脉压迫是非常重要和必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信