Inter-rater reliability and acceptability of a clinical prediction rule for opioid-associated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
David G Dillon, Colleen Kellison, Juan Carlos C Montoy, Joanna Sokol, Ralph C Wang, Robert M Rodriguez
{"title":"Inter-rater reliability and acceptability of a clinical prediction rule for opioid-associated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.","authors":"David G Dillon, Colleen Kellison, Juan Carlos C Montoy, Joanna Sokol, Ralph C Wang, Robert M Rodriguez","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2523986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>One-in-six cases of atraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in North America are thought to be precipitated by opioid overdose, but many of these cases are not obvious and there is no gold standard used by emergency medical service (EMS) personnel to identify opioid-associated (OA)-OHCA. The NAloxone Cardiac ARrest Decision Instrument (NACARDI) was developed and validated to identify potential OA-OHCA, however it has not yet been used in the field. We sought to prospectively assess the inter-rater reliability and acceptability of NACARDI in real-world OHCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Emergency medical service clinicians evaluated the NACARDI criteria during acute resuscitations of patients with OHCA in San Francisco between September 2022 - February 2024. The NACARDI rule utilized in this study consisted of two criteria: patient age <60 years and unwitnessed cardiac arrest. Clinicians completed a short survey that included free-text questions, multiple choice question, and Likert-type scales rating NACARDI's ease of use, describing when during the resuscitation they were able to assess NACARDI, and identifying potential barriers. In cases where two clinicians completed NARCADI assessments for a single OHCA case, we calculated a kappa coefficient of agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Emergency medical service clinicians evaluated 149 cases of OHCA and completed 198 surveys - 100 (67.1%) cases had one survey response and 49 (32.9%) had survey responses from two EMS personnel. Clinicians were able to ascertain NACARDI criteria \"prior to or during the first cardiac rhythm check\" in 80.3% of cases. NACARDI was reported as \"easy to use\" by 83.3% of respondents. The overall Kappa coefficient for NACARDI was 0.73 (95%CI 0.51-0.95). The three most common reasons why NACARDI criteria were deemed difficult to ascertain were chaotic scene, language barrier, and unreliable bystander accounts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was reasonable agreement in how NACARDI was interpreted for OHCA cases and the majority of surveyed EMS clinicians found NACARDI easy to use. These findings suggest that NACARDI can be reliably and easily used by EMS clinicians during acute OHCA resuscitations to identify OA-OHCA patients, potentially informing inclusion criteria for future research studies and guiding targeted interventions for this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12252226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2523986","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: One-in-six cases of atraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in North America are thought to be precipitated by opioid overdose, but many of these cases are not obvious and there is no gold standard used by emergency medical service (EMS) personnel to identify opioid-associated (OA)-OHCA. The NAloxone Cardiac ARrest Decision Instrument (NACARDI) was developed and validated to identify potential OA-OHCA, however it has not yet been used in the field. We sought to prospectively assess the inter-rater reliability and acceptability of NACARDI in real-world OHCA.

Methods: Emergency medical service clinicians evaluated the NACARDI criteria during acute resuscitations of patients with OHCA in San Francisco between September 2022 - February 2024. The NACARDI rule utilized in this study consisted of two criteria: patient age <60 years and unwitnessed cardiac arrest. Clinicians completed a short survey that included free-text questions, multiple choice question, and Likert-type scales rating NACARDI's ease of use, describing when during the resuscitation they were able to assess NACARDI, and identifying potential barriers. In cases where two clinicians completed NARCADI assessments for a single OHCA case, we calculated a kappa coefficient of agreement.

Results: Emergency medical service clinicians evaluated 149 cases of OHCA and completed 198 surveys - 100 (67.1%) cases had one survey response and 49 (32.9%) had survey responses from two EMS personnel. Clinicians were able to ascertain NACARDI criteria "prior to or during the first cardiac rhythm check" in 80.3% of cases. NACARDI was reported as "easy to use" by 83.3% of respondents. The overall Kappa coefficient for NACARDI was 0.73 (95%CI 0.51-0.95). The three most common reasons why NACARDI criteria were deemed difficult to ascertain were chaotic scene, language barrier, and unreliable bystander accounts.

Conclusions: There was reasonable agreement in how NACARDI was interpreted for OHCA cases and the majority of surveyed EMS clinicians found NACARDI easy to use. These findings suggest that NACARDI can be reliably and easily used by EMS clinicians during acute OHCA resuscitations to identify OA-OHCA patients, potentially informing inclusion criteria for future research studies and guiding targeted interventions for this patient population.

阿片类药物相关院外心脏骤停临床预测规则的可靠性和可接受性
目的:北美六分之一的非创伤性院外心脏骤停(OHCA)病例被认为是由阿片类药物过量引起的,但其中许多病例并不明显,而且紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员没有确定阿片类药物相关(OA)-OHCA的金标准。纳洛酮心脏骤停决策仪(NACARDI)的开发和验证,以确定潜在的OA-OHCA,但尚未在现场使用。我们试图前瞻性地评估NACARDI在现实世界OHCA中的可靠性和可接受性。方法:急诊医疗服务临床医生在2022年9月至2024年2月期间对旧金山OHCA患者急性复苏期间的NACARDI标准进行评估。本研究中使用的NACARDI规则包括两个标准:患者年龄结果:急诊医疗服务临床医生评估了149例OHCA病例并完成了198项调查,其中100例(67.1%)有一次调查回应,49例(32.9%)有两名EMS人员的调查回应。临床医生能够在80.3%的病例中“在第一次心律检查之前或期间”确定NACARDI标准。83.3%的受访者认为NACARDI“易于使用”。NACARDI的总体Kappa系数为0.73 (95%CI 0.51-0.95)。NACARDI标准被认为难以确定的三个最常见的原因是混乱的场景、语言障碍和不可靠的旁观者描述。结论:对于如何解释NACARDI用于OHCA病例有合理的共识,大多数受访的EMS临床医生认为NACARDI易于使用。这些发现表明,在急性OHCA复苏期间,EMS临床医生可以可靠且轻松地使用NACARDI来识别OA-OHCA患者,可能为未来研究的纳入标准提供信息,并指导针对该患者群体的针对性干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信