Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases and primary liver tumors: treatment results and toxicity.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Nika Dobnikar, Ajra Secerov Ermenc, Dasa Grabec, Ana Jeromen Peressutti, Peter Korosec, Valerija Zager Marcius, Nina Boc, Ivica Ratosa, Irena Oblak
{"title":"Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases and primary liver tumors: treatment results and toxicity.","authors":"Nika Dobnikar, Ajra Secerov Ermenc, Dasa Grabec, Ana Jeromen Peressutti, Peter Korosec, Valerija Zager Marcius, Nina Boc, Ivica Ratosa, Irena Oblak","doi":"10.4149/neo_2025_250320N132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of our research was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the liver in all patients diagnosed with either primary liver tumor or metastases from other primary malignancies since its initial application at a single institution. A retrospective analysis of the prospective designed registry included 105 patients with 133 liver metastases or primary tumors treated with SBRT from the introduction of the technique in March 2018 until November 2023. The main objectives of the study were to evaluate treatment toxicity, disease control, and survival rates. At a median follow-up of 24 months, a complete response to treatment was achieved in 86.7% of patients. During irradiation, only one patient experienced grade 3 abdominal discomfort, while the other 34.3% of patients experienced only mild acute adverse events (AEs), the majority of which were nausea. After completion of SBRT, 36.2% of patients reported AEs, but only grade 1 and 2 toxicity was observed. The one-, two-, and five-year LC rates were 89.2%, 84.9%, and 84.9%, respectively. DFS rates were 54.7%, 42.9%, and 25.8%; DSS rates were 94.9%, 81.1%, and 46.8%; and OS rates at one, two, and five years were 93.1%, 79.6%, and 43.2%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, only the number of lesions presented independent prognostic value. In conclusion, SBRT offers effective disease control and survival rates with minimal toxicity, side by side with surgical options as a curative treatment for liver tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":19266,"journal":{"name":"Neoplasma","volume":"72 3","pages":"192-199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neoplasma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4149/neo_2025_250320N132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of our research was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the liver in all patients diagnosed with either primary liver tumor or metastases from other primary malignancies since its initial application at a single institution. A retrospective analysis of the prospective designed registry included 105 patients with 133 liver metastases or primary tumors treated with SBRT from the introduction of the technique in March 2018 until November 2023. The main objectives of the study were to evaluate treatment toxicity, disease control, and survival rates. At a median follow-up of 24 months, a complete response to treatment was achieved in 86.7% of patients. During irradiation, only one patient experienced grade 3 abdominal discomfort, while the other 34.3% of patients experienced only mild acute adverse events (AEs), the majority of which were nausea. After completion of SBRT, 36.2% of patients reported AEs, but only grade 1 and 2 toxicity was observed. The one-, two-, and five-year LC rates were 89.2%, 84.9%, and 84.9%, respectively. DFS rates were 54.7%, 42.9%, and 25.8%; DSS rates were 94.9%, 81.1%, and 46.8%; and OS rates at one, two, and five years were 93.1%, 79.6%, and 43.2%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, only the number of lesions presented independent prognostic value. In conclusion, SBRT offers effective disease control and survival rates with minimal toxicity, side by side with surgical options as a curative treatment for liver tumors.

肝转移和原发性肝肿瘤的立体定向放射治疗:治疗结果和毒性。
我们研究的目的是评估立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)在所有被诊断为原发性肝肿瘤或其他原发性恶性肿瘤转移的患者的疗效和毒性,因为它最初在一个机构应用。对前瞻性设计登记的回顾性分析包括105例133例肝转移或原发性肿瘤患者,从2018年3月引入SBRT技术到2023年11月。该研究的主要目的是评估治疗毒性、疾病控制和生存率。在中位随访24个月时,86.7%的患者对治疗完全缓解。在辐照期间,只有1例患者出现3级腹部不适,而其他34.3%的患者仅出现轻度急性不良事件(ae),其中大多数为恶心。完成SBRT后,36.2%的患者报告了不良反应,但仅观察到1级和2级毒性。1年、2年和5年LC率分别为89.2%、84.9%和84.9%。DFS分别为54.7%、42.9%和25.8%;DSS发生率分别为94.9%、81.1%和46.8%;1年、2年和5年的总生存率分别为93.1%、79.6%和43.2%。在多变量分析中,只有病变数量具有独立的预后价值。总之,SBRT提供了有效的疾病控制和生存率,毒性最小,与手术选择一起作为肝脏肿瘤的根治性治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neoplasma
Neoplasma 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
238
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Neoplasma publishes articles on experimental and clinical oncology and cancer epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信