Marcela Konjevod, Jorge Sáiz, Lucía Bordoy, Dubravka Svob Strac, Ameer Y Taha, Senentxu Lanceros-Méndez, Rosa M Alonso
{"title":"Validated metabolomic biomarkers in psychiatric disorders: a narrative review.","authors":"Marcela Konjevod, Jorge Sáiz, Lucía Bordoy, Dubravka Svob Strac, Ameer Y Taha, Senentxu Lanceros-Méndez, Rosa M Alonso","doi":"10.1186/s10020-025-01258-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder are severe and profoundly debilitating mental illnesses. Due to their heterogeneity and polygenic nature, the metabolic pathways and biological mechanisms underlying these conditions remain elusive. Consequently, diagnosing psychiatric disorders is a complex and multifaceted process, relying on clinical assessment and standardized diagnostic criteria. There is a growing demand to identify and integrate potential biomarkers for these disorders, especially for early diagnosis, to enhance diagnostic accuracy and complement existing diagnostic tools. Validating potential diagnostic biomarkers is essential to ensure their accuracy, reliability, generalizability, and clinical utility.In this article we provide a comprehensive review of validated metabolomics research, focusing on both the specific psychiatric conditions and the types of validation performed. Our scope is limited to peer-reviewed studies that include studies that performed validation studies in independent cohorts, cross-validation, or external validation. Due to the lack of published research, most of these validation studies have concentrated on major depressive disorder and schizophrenia, with fewer studies addressing bipolar disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder.Biomarkers are considered as validated if they demonstrated reproducibility in additional cohorts and biological relevance across independent datasets. However, several limitations must be acknowledged, including the heterogeneity in study design, small sample sizes, different analytical platforms, and inconsistent validation criteria across studies. Published results reveal that potential metabolomics biomarkers pertain to diverse categories pointing to a range of cellular, biological, and metabolic processes and emphasizing the intricate nature of psychiatric disorders. Such findings illustrate the formidable challenge of identifying and validating clinically useful metabolomic biomarkers and underscore the necessity for further research that encompasses various validation methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18813,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":"254"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12239260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-025-01258-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder are severe and profoundly debilitating mental illnesses. Due to their heterogeneity and polygenic nature, the metabolic pathways and biological mechanisms underlying these conditions remain elusive. Consequently, diagnosing psychiatric disorders is a complex and multifaceted process, relying on clinical assessment and standardized diagnostic criteria. There is a growing demand to identify and integrate potential biomarkers for these disorders, especially for early diagnosis, to enhance diagnostic accuracy and complement existing diagnostic tools. Validating potential diagnostic biomarkers is essential to ensure their accuracy, reliability, generalizability, and clinical utility.In this article we provide a comprehensive review of validated metabolomics research, focusing on both the specific psychiatric conditions and the types of validation performed. Our scope is limited to peer-reviewed studies that include studies that performed validation studies in independent cohorts, cross-validation, or external validation. Due to the lack of published research, most of these validation studies have concentrated on major depressive disorder and schizophrenia, with fewer studies addressing bipolar disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder.Biomarkers are considered as validated if they demonstrated reproducibility in additional cohorts and biological relevance across independent datasets. However, several limitations must be acknowledged, including the heterogeneity in study design, small sample sizes, different analytical platforms, and inconsistent validation criteria across studies. Published results reveal that potential metabolomics biomarkers pertain to diverse categories pointing to a range of cellular, biological, and metabolic processes and emphasizing the intricate nature of psychiatric disorders. Such findings illustrate the formidable challenge of identifying and validating clinically useful metabolomic biomarkers and underscore the necessity for further research that encompasses various validation methodologies.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Medicine is an open access journal that focuses on publishing recent findings related to disease pathogenesis at the molecular or physiological level. These insights can potentially contribute to the development of specific tools for disease diagnosis, treatment, or prevention. The journal considers manuscripts that present material pertinent to the genetic, molecular, or cellular underpinnings of critical physiological or disease processes. Submissions to Molecular Medicine are expected to elucidate the broader implications of the research findings for human disease and medicine in a manner that is accessible to a wide audience.