Evaluation of a Multiplex Electrochemiluminescence Assay for Detection of Anti-Pneumococcal Antibodies in the Diagnosis of Selective Polysaccharide Antibody Deficiency.

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Nicolas Perrard, Aurore Collet, Sarah Stabler, Sandrine Poizot, Myriam Labalette, Gatien Durand, Frédéric Batteux, Floriane Mirgot, Benjamin Lopez, Sylvain Dubucquoi, Lucie Chevrier, Guillaume Lefèvre
{"title":"Evaluation of a Multiplex Electrochemiluminescence Assay for Detection of Anti-Pneumococcal Antibodies in the Diagnosis of Selective Polysaccharide Antibody Deficiency.","authors":"Nicolas Perrard, Aurore Collet, Sarah Stabler, Sandrine Poizot, Myriam Labalette, Gatien Durand, Frédéric Batteux, Floriane Mirgot, Benjamin Lopez, Sylvain Dubucquoi, Lucie Chevrier, Guillaume Lefèvre","doi":"10.1007/s10875-025-01911-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Streptococcus pneumoniae can be responsible for severe infections, especially in patients with primary antibody deficiencies like selective anti-polysaccharide antibodies deficiency (SPAD). The reference method recommaned by the World Health Organization for assessment of anti-pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides (PCPs) IgG antibodies is a standardized serotype-specific ELISA (WHO-SSA), but this manual method is time-consuming and limit the number of evaluated PCPs. We aim to evaluate the performance values of a multiplex assay based on electrochemiluminescence (ECL-plex). A panel of 164 sera from 82 patients sampled before and 4-8 weeks after immunization by the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) were assessed by the reference WHO-SSA (7 to 13 serotypes) and by an 18-plex ECL assay (18 serotypes). All patients had normal serum Ig/subclasses levels and were classified as good (n = 43) or poor responders (n = 39, i.e. SPAD patients) according to the American Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Immunology's (AAAAI) current guidelines. We observed excellent correlations between the two methods for anti-PCPs titers against 7 serotypes (r = 0.88 [95% CI: 0.87-0.90], n = 124 sera) and 13 serotypes (r = 0.87 [0.87-0.89], n = 40 sera). Using the AAAAI's guidelines for interpretation, the test performance of the 18-plex ECL assay for SPAD diagnosis showed a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 84%, positive and negative predictive values of 84% and 95%, respectively. The percentage of agreement was 89% between the SSA and the 18-plex ECL assay. The 18-plex ECL assay is a reliable, rapid, and simple method for evaluating anti-PCPs response and screening for SPAD diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15531,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Immunology","volume":"45 1","pages":"112"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12245944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-025-01911-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Streptococcus pneumoniae can be responsible for severe infections, especially in patients with primary antibody deficiencies like selective anti-polysaccharide antibodies deficiency (SPAD). The reference method recommaned by the World Health Organization for assessment of anti-pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides (PCPs) IgG antibodies is a standardized serotype-specific ELISA (WHO-SSA), but this manual method is time-consuming and limit the number of evaluated PCPs. We aim to evaluate the performance values of a multiplex assay based on electrochemiluminescence (ECL-plex). A panel of 164 sera from 82 patients sampled before and 4-8 weeks after immunization by the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) were assessed by the reference WHO-SSA (7 to 13 serotypes) and by an 18-plex ECL assay (18 serotypes). All patients had normal serum Ig/subclasses levels and were classified as good (n = 43) or poor responders (n = 39, i.e. SPAD patients) according to the American Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Immunology's (AAAAI) current guidelines. We observed excellent correlations between the two methods for anti-PCPs titers against 7 serotypes (r = 0.88 [95% CI: 0.87-0.90], n = 124 sera) and 13 serotypes (r = 0.87 [0.87-0.89], n = 40 sera). Using the AAAAI's guidelines for interpretation, the test performance of the 18-plex ECL assay for SPAD diagnosis showed a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 84%, positive and negative predictive values of 84% and 95%, respectively. The percentage of agreement was 89% between the SSA and the 18-plex ECL assay. The 18-plex ECL assay is a reliable, rapid, and simple method for evaluating anti-PCPs response and screening for SPAD diagnosis.

多重电化学发光法检测抗肺炎球菌抗体诊断选择性多糖抗体缺乏症的评价。
肺炎链球菌可导致严重感染,特别是在一抗缺乏如选择性抗多糖抗体缺乏(SPAD)的患者中。世界卫生组织推荐的评估抗肺炎球菌荚膜多糖IgG抗体的参考方法是标准化血清型特异性ELISA (WHO-SSA),但这种手工方法耗时且评估的pcp数量有限。我们的目的是评估基于电化学发光(ECL-plex)的多重分析的性能值。采用参考WHO-SSA(7 - 13种血清型)和18 plex ECL测定(18种血清型)对82例患者在接种23价肺炎球菌多糖疫苗(PPV23)前和接种后4-8周取样的164份血清进行了评估。根据美国哮喘、过敏和免疫学会(AAAAI)现行指南,所有患者血清Ig/亚类水平正常,并分为良好(n = 43)或不良反应(n = 39,即SPAD患者)。我们观察到两种方法对7种血清型(r = 0.88 [95% CI: 0.87-0.90], n = 124种血清)和13种血清型(r = 0.87 [0.87-0.89], n = 40种血清)的抗pcp滴度具有良好的相关性。根据AAAAI的解释指南,18 plex ECL法诊断SPAD的灵敏度为95%,特异性为84%,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为84%和95%。SSA和18-plex ECL测定之间的一致性百分比为89%。18-plex ECL试验是一种可靠、快速、简单的评估抗pcp反应和筛查SPAD诊断的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
9.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Immunology publishes impactful papers in the realm of human immunology, delving into the diagnosis, pathogenesis, prognosis, or treatment of human diseases. The journal places particular emphasis on primary immunodeficiencies and related diseases, encompassing inborn errors of immunity in a broad sense, their underlying genotypes, and diverse phenotypes. These phenotypes include infection, malignancy, allergy, auto-inflammation, and autoimmunity. We welcome a broad spectrum of studies in this domain, spanning genetic discovery, clinical description, immunologic assessment, diagnostic approaches, prognosis evaluation, and treatment interventions. Case reports are considered if they are genuinely original and accompanied by a concise review of the relevant medical literature, illustrating how the novel case study advances the field. The instructions to authors provide detailed guidance on the four categories of papers accepted by the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信