The Effect of Different Self-Administered Tongue Exercises on Tongue Strength and Endurance in Older Adults.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Gerodontology Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1111/ger.70005
Thunchanok Suppapatpong, Atiphan Pimkhaokham, Boosana Kaboosaya
{"title":"The Effect of Different Self-Administered Tongue Exercises on Tongue Strength and Endurance in Older Adults.","authors":"Thunchanok Suppapatpong, Atiphan Pimkhaokham, Boosana Kaboosaya","doi":"10.1111/ger.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-administered tongue exercises (TEs) are proposed as an effective, low-cost and convenient intervention for improving maximum tongue strength and endurance. However, age-related factors make self-administered TEs more challenging for older individuals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of self-administered TEs on maximum tongue strength and endurance in older individuals.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Seventy-two healthy volunteers, both young and older groups, were randomly allocated to three self-administered TE groups: tongue wrap, tongue corner and tongue paint. Maximum tongue strength and tongue endurance were assessed at baseline (T0) and after 4 weeks of training (T1) using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare pre- and post-intervention outcomes within groups, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare gains among groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 4 weeks of self-administered TEs, the average gains in maximum tongue strength and endurance did not differ significantly between young and older participants. The gains in maximum tongue strength for young and older participants were as follows: tongue wrap (7.7 vs. 3.3 kPa, p = 0.2), tongue corner (4.0 vs. 1.7 kPa, p = 0.6) and tongue paint (3.5 vs. 3.7 kPa, p = 1.0). For tongue endurance, young and older participants gained 3.9 vs. 13.0 s (p = 0.2), 1.3 vs. 11.0 s (p = 0.1) and 3.8 vs. -0.2 s (p = 0.5), respectively. While the tongue paint exercise resulted in the highest gains in maximum tongue strength, and the tongue wrap exercise showed the greatest improvement in tongue endurance among older adults, these differences were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Four weeks of self-administered TEs had a positive impact on tongue strength and endurance in older individuals. Although our findings are most compatible with no important difference among exercise types in the older, notable patterns suggest potential benefits. Future studies should explore optimal exercise intensity and duration to maximise effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":12583,"journal":{"name":"Gerodontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.70005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Self-administered tongue exercises (TEs) are proposed as an effective, low-cost and convenient intervention for improving maximum tongue strength and endurance. However, age-related factors make self-administered TEs more challenging for older individuals.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of self-administered TEs on maximum tongue strength and endurance in older individuals.

Material and methods: Seventy-two healthy volunteers, both young and older groups, were randomly allocated to three self-administered TE groups: tongue wrap, tongue corner and tongue paint. Maximum tongue strength and tongue endurance were assessed at baseline (T0) and after 4 weeks of training (T1) using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare pre- and post-intervention outcomes within groups, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare gains among groups.

Results: After 4 weeks of self-administered TEs, the average gains in maximum tongue strength and endurance did not differ significantly between young and older participants. The gains in maximum tongue strength for young and older participants were as follows: tongue wrap (7.7 vs. 3.3 kPa, p = 0.2), tongue corner (4.0 vs. 1.7 kPa, p = 0.6) and tongue paint (3.5 vs. 3.7 kPa, p = 1.0). For tongue endurance, young and older participants gained 3.9 vs. 13.0 s (p = 0.2), 1.3 vs. 11.0 s (p = 0.1) and 3.8 vs. -0.2 s (p = 0.5), respectively. While the tongue paint exercise resulted in the highest gains in maximum tongue strength, and the tongue wrap exercise showed the greatest improvement in tongue endurance among older adults, these differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Four weeks of self-administered TEs had a positive impact on tongue strength and endurance in older individuals. Although our findings are most compatible with no important difference among exercise types in the older, notable patterns suggest potential benefits. Future studies should explore optimal exercise intensity and duration to maximise effectiveness.

不同自我给舌练习对老年人舌力和耐力的影响。
背景:自我舌头练习(TEs)被认为是一种有效、低成本和方便的干预措施,可以提高舌头的最大强度和耐力。然而,与年龄相关的因素使老年人自我管理TEs更具挑战性。目的:本研究旨在评估自我给药TEs对老年人最大舌力和耐力的影响。材料和方法:72名健康志愿者,包括年轻人和老年人,随机分为三个自我给药TE组:舌包、舌角和舌漆。在基线(T0)和训练4周(T1)后,使用爱荷华口腔性能仪(IOPI)评估最大舌强度和舌耐力。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较组内干预前后的结果,采用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较组间的收益。结果:自我给药te 4周后,年轻和老年参与者在最大舌头强度和耐力方面的平均增长没有显著差异。年轻人和老年人最大舌头强度的增加如下:舌包(7.7对3.3千帕,p = 0.2),舌角(4.0对1.7千帕,p = 0.6)和舌漆(3.5对3.7千帕,p = 1.0)。在舌头耐力方面,年轻和年长的参与者分别增加了3.9比13.0秒(p = 0.2)、1.3比11.0秒(p = 0.1)和3.8比-0.2秒(p = 0.5)。虽然在老年人中,舌漆练习能最大限度地提高舌头的强度,而裹舌练习能最大限度地提高舌头的耐力,但这些差异在统计学上并不显著。结论:四周的自我给药TEs对老年人的舌头力量和耐力有积极的影响。尽管我们的研究结果与老年人的运动类型之间没有重大差异是一致的,但值得注意的模式表明了潜在的益处。未来的研究应该探索最佳的运动强度和持续时间,以最大限度地提高效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerodontology
Gerodontology 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Gerodontology is to improve the quality of life and oral health of older people. The boundaries of most conventional dental specialties must be repeatedly crossed to provide optimal dental care for older people. In addition, management of other health problems impacts on dental care and clinicians need knowledge in these numerous overlapping areas. Bringing together these diverse topics within one journal serves clinicians who are seeking to read and to publish papers across a broad spectrum of specialties. This journal provides the juxtaposition of papers from traditional specialties but which share this patient-centred interest, providing a synergy that serves progress in the subject of gerodontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信