The 2025 European Cystic Fibrosis Society position statement on physical activity assessment in cystic fibrosis.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2025-07-09 Print Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1183/16000617.0279-2024
Craig A Williams, Brenda Button, Tiffany J Dwyer, Elpis Hatziagorou, Kelly A Mackintosh, Melitta A McNarry, Dewi Paris, James Shelley, Helge Hebestreit, Judy Bradley, Mayara Silveira Bianchim
{"title":"The 2025 European Cystic Fibrosis Society position statement on physical activity assessment in cystic fibrosis.","authors":"Craig A Williams, Brenda Button, Tiffany J Dwyer, Elpis Hatziagorou, Kelly A Mackintosh, Melitta A McNarry, Dewi Paris, James Shelley, Helge Hebestreit, Judy Bradley, Mayara Silveira Bianchim","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0279-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent advances in the measurement of physical activity have significantly enhanced the analyses and interpretation in relation to health and well-being. Thus, we sought to revise and expand the 2015 position statement on the measurement of physical activity and provide guidance to clinicians and researchers for measuring physical activity in cystic fibrosis (CF) clinical practice and research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO) database (CRD42022292165). Three databases (Medline, Embase and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) were searched for studies investigating the measurement of physical activity and sedentary time in people with CF irrespective of age or duration. The Quality Assessment for Diverse Studies was used to assess methodological concern. A mixed-methods framework synthesis was used to extract, map, chart, categorise and aggregate study findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 7439 potentially relevant publications were identified. Following screening of titles and abstracts, 422 full texts were retrieved and assessed for eligibility, with 90 studies included. There was considerable variation in the methods of assessment, data processing and analytical interpretation of data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is recommended that device-based physical activity metrics are presented as time spent in different intensity categories (<i>e.g.</i>, light, moderate and vigorous) and to include sedentary and sleep time. For data analysis, the data resolution should be at least 1 s (minimum 30 Hz) to enable clinical teams to obtain representative categorisation of patients' physical activity patterns. Validated questionnaires (<i>e.g.</i>, the Habitual Activity Estimation Scale) offer additional opportunities to assess physical activity, whilst diaries can add context but should be viewed as secondary outcome measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 177","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0279-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent advances in the measurement of physical activity have significantly enhanced the analyses and interpretation in relation to health and well-being. Thus, we sought to revise and expand the 2015 position statement on the measurement of physical activity and provide guidance to clinicians and researchers for measuring physical activity in cystic fibrosis (CF) clinical practice and research.

Methods: This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO) database (CRD42022292165). Three databases (Medline, Embase and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) were searched for studies investigating the measurement of physical activity and sedentary time in people with CF irrespective of age or duration. The Quality Assessment for Diverse Studies was used to assess methodological concern. A mixed-methods framework synthesis was used to extract, map, chart, categorise and aggregate study findings.

Results: In total, 7439 potentially relevant publications were identified. Following screening of titles and abstracts, 422 full texts were retrieved and assessed for eligibility, with 90 studies included. There was considerable variation in the methods of assessment, data processing and analytical interpretation of data.

Conclusion: It is recommended that device-based physical activity metrics are presented as time spent in different intensity categories (e.g., light, moderate and vigorous) and to include sedentary and sleep time. For data analysis, the data resolution should be at least 1 s (minimum 30 Hz) to enable clinical teams to obtain representative categorisation of patients' physical activity patterns. Validated questionnaires (e.g., the Habitual Activity Estimation Scale) offer additional opportunities to assess physical activity, whilst diaries can add context but should be viewed as secondary outcome measurements.

2025年欧洲囊性纤维化协会关于囊性纤维化患者体育活动评估的立场声明。
背景:最近在体力活动测量方面取得的进展大大加强了与健康和福祉有关的分析和解释。因此,我们试图修订和扩展2015年关于身体活动测量的立场声明,并为临床医生和研究人员在囊性纤维化(CF)临床实践和研究中测量身体活动提供指导。方法:本研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO)数据库注册(CRD42022292165)。我们检索了三个数据库(Medline、Embase和护理和相关健康文献累积指数),以调查CF患者的身体活动和久坐时间的测量,而不考虑年龄或持续时间。不同研究的质量评估用于评估方法学问题。混合方法框架综合用于提取,地图,图表,分类和汇总研究结果。结果:共鉴定出7439篇可能相关的出版物。在对标题和摘要进行筛选后,检索了422篇全文,并对其适用性进行了评估,其中包括90项研究。在评估、数据处理和数据分析解释的方法方面存在相当大的差异。结论:建议基于设备的身体活动指标以不同强度类别(例如,轻度、中度和剧烈)的时间来表示,并包括久坐和睡眠时间。对于数据分析,数据分辨率应至少为1s(最低30 Hz),以使临床团队能够获得患者身体活动模式的代表性分类。有效的问卷调查(例如,习惯性活动评估量表)提供了额外的机会来评估身体活动,而日记可以添加背景,但应被视为次要的结果测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信