Patient-reported outcome measures for cough used in interstitial lung disease: a systematic review.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2025-07-09 Print Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1183/16000617.0206-2024
Jennifer Mann, Hayley Barnes, Jeremy Lew, Yet H Khor, Nicole Goh, Anne E Holland
{"title":"Patient-reported outcome measures for cough used in interstitial lung disease: a systematic review.","authors":"Jennifer Mann, Hayley Barnes, Jeremy Lew, Yet H Khor, Nicole Goh, Anne E Holland","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0206-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Validated and reliable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are recommended to assess the severity and impact of cough in interstitial lung disease (ILD). We systematically reviewed the literature to identify PROMs for cough in ILD, examining their psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched four databases from inception to 10 January 2025. English-language original articles that described the use of a PROM to measure cough in adults with ILD and addressed the psychometric properties, method of administration or results of usability testing were selected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>21 PROMs were evaluated in 35 studies, including 14 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and seven in other ILDs, eight cough-specific PROMs, and 13 disease-specific PROMs with a domain for cough. No tool had sufficient evidence for more than 5/7 of the psychometric properties evaluated. There was evidence for content validity for four PROMs in IPF (A Tool to Assess Quality of Life in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (ATAQ-IPF), the Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire (CASA-Q), Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms: COPD (E-RS™:COPD) and the Living with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Questionnaire (L-IPF)). Only one study evaluated convergent validity using objective cough monitoring, demonstrating high validity for the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) (r=-0.74- -0.80) and cough visual analogue scale (VAS) (r=0.80). Acceptable internal consistency (α>0.7) was demonstrated for 10 PROMs (ATAQ-IPF, the Cross-Atlantic modification of ATAQ-IPF, the Chinese version of ATAQ-IPF, CASA-Q, E-RS™:COPD, LCQ, L-IPF, the IPF-specific version of St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), the modified version of the Edmonton System Assessment System and SGRQ). The cough VAS demonstrated good predictive validity and L-IPF was responsive to ILD-specific therapies, with effect sizes ranging from 0.32 to 0.44.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence supporting the measurement properties of available PROMs for cough in ILD is limited. Further validation of existing instruments and the development of new disease-specific PROMs are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 177","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12238875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0206-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Validated and reliable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are recommended to assess the severity and impact of cough in interstitial lung disease (ILD). We systematically reviewed the literature to identify PROMs for cough in ILD, examining their psychometric properties.

Methods: We searched four databases from inception to 10 January 2025. English-language original articles that described the use of a PROM to measure cough in adults with ILD and addressed the psychometric properties, method of administration or results of usability testing were selected.

Results: 21 PROMs were evaluated in 35 studies, including 14 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and seven in other ILDs, eight cough-specific PROMs, and 13 disease-specific PROMs with a domain for cough. No tool had sufficient evidence for more than 5/7 of the psychometric properties evaluated. There was evidence for content validity for four PROMs in IPF (A Tool to Assess Quality of Life in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (ATAQ-IPF), the Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire (CASA-Q), Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms: COPD (E-RS™:COPD) and the Living with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Questionnaire (L-IPF)). Only one study evaluated convergent validity using objective cough monitoring, demonstrating high validity for the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) (r=-0.74- -0.80) and cough visual analogue scale (VAS) (r=0.80). Acceptable internal consistency (α>0.7) was demonstrated for 10 PROMs (ATAQ-IPF, the Cross-Atlantic modification of ATAQ-IPF, the Chinese version of ATAQ-IPF, CASA-Q, E-RS™:COPD, LCQ, L-IPF, the IPF-specific version of St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), the modified version of the Edmonton System Assessment System and SGRQ). The cough VAS demonstrated good predictive validity and L-IPF was responsive to ILD-specific therapies, with effect sizes ranging from 0.32 to 0.44.

Conclusion: Evidence supporting the measurement properties of available PROMs for cough in ILD is limited. Further validation of existing instruments and the development of new disease-specific PROMs are needed.

间质性肺疾病患者报告的咳嗽结果测量:一项系统综述
推荐使用经过验证和可靠的患者报告结果测量(PROMs)来评估间质性肺疾病(ILD)咳嗽的严重程度和影响。我们系统地回顾了文献,以确定ILD咳嗽的PROMs,并检查其心理测量学特性。方法:检索自成立至2025年1月10日的4个数据库。选择描述使用PROM测量ILD成人咳嗽的英文原创文章,并讨论心理测量特性、给药方法或可用性测试结果。结果:在35项研究中评估了21个PROMs,包括14个特发性肺纤维化(IPF)和7个其他ILDs, 8个咳嗽特异性PROMs, 13个疾病特异性PROMs与咳嗽结构域。没有任何工具对超过5/7的心理测量特性有足够的证据。IPF中的4个PROMs(特发性肺纤维化生活质量评估工具(ATAQ-IPF)、咳嗽和痰液评估问卷(CASA-Q)、评估呼吸道症状:COPD (E-RS™:COPD)和特发性肺纤维化生活问卷(L-IPF))的内容效度有证据。只有一项研究使用客观咳嗽监测来评估收敛效度,显示莱斯特咳嗽问卷(LCQ) (r=-0.74- -0.80)和咳嗽视觉模拟量表(VAS) (r=0.80)具有高效度。10个PROMs (ATAQ-IPF、跨大西洋版ATAQ-IPF、中文版ATAQ-IPF、CASA-Q、E-RS™:COPD、LCQ、L-IPF、ipf专用版圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)、修改版埃德蒙顿系统评估系统和SGRQ)的内部一致性可接受(α>0.7)。咳嗽VAS显示出良好的预测效度,L-IPF对ild特异性治疗有反应,效应值范围为0.32至0.44。结论:支持可用于ILD咳嗽的PROMs测量特性的证据有限。需要进一步验证现有仪器和开发新的针对疾病的PROMs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信