Rafael Von Hellmann, Ian Ward A Maia, Brian E Driver, Julia M Dorn De Carvalho, Danielle Gerberi, Fernanda Bellolio, Lucas Oliveira J E Silva
{"title":"Effect of pretreatment opioids on hemodynamics during emergency intubations: a systematic review.","authors":"Rafael Von Hellmann, Ian Ward A Maia, Brian E Driver, Julia M Dorn De Carvalho, Danielle Gerberi, Fernanda Bellolio, Lucas Oliveira J E Silva","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid sequence intubation in emergency settings may involve opioid pretreatment to blunt hemodynamic responses during laryngoscopy and intubation; however, opioids may lead to postintubation hypotension, increasing morbidity and mortality. Global clinical practice varies significantly, reflecting uncertainty about opioids' benefits and risks. Our goal was to evaluate the association between opioid pretreatment and hemodynamic instability, focusing on postintubation hypotension in adult patients undergoing emergency intubation. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing opioid administration vs. no opioids before adult emergency intubations. Searches included Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until November 2024. Elective intubations were excluded. Eight (6708 patients) studies met criteria. The primary outcome was postintubation hypotension, variably defined across studies. Secondary outcomes included hypoxemia, first-attempt success, cardiac arrest, and vasopressor use. Independent reviewers conducted data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and certainty evaluation. Results were qualitatively synthesized. Among 6708 (2757 opioids and 3951 controls) patients, postintubation hypotension incidence varied widely (risk differences: -12.5% favoring opioids to +13.2% favoring controls). The single low-risk randomized study reported opioids increased hypotension (risk difference: 13%, odds ratio: 2.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-3.78). Observational studies yielded inconsistent results. Secondary outcomes showed no consistent differences. Evidence certainty was very low because of risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. Current evidence regarding opioid pretreatment effect on postintubation hypotension risk during emergency intubation is limited and conflicting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rapid sequence intubation in emergency settings may involve opioid pretreatment to blunt hemodynamic responses during laryngoscopy and intubation; however, opioids may lead to postintubation hypotension, increasing morbidity and mortality. Global clinical practice varies significantly, reflecting uncertainty about opioids' benefits and risks. Our goal was to evaluate the association between opioid pretreatment and hemodynamic instability, focusing on postintubation hypotension in adult patients undergoing emergency intubation. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing opioid administration vs. no opioids before adult emergency intubations. Searches included Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until November 2024. Elective intubations were excluded. Eight (6708 patients) studies met criteria. The primary outcome was postintubation hypotension, variably defined across studies. Secondary outcomes included hypoxemia, first-attempt success, cardiac arrest, and vasopressor use. Independent reviewers conducted data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and certainty evaluation. Results were qualitatively synthesized. Among 6708 (2757 opioids and 3951 controls) patients, postintubation hypotension incidence varied widely (risk differences: -12.5% favoring opioids to +13.2% favoring controls). The single low-risk randomized study reported opioids increased hypotension (risk difference: 13%, odds ratio: 2.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-3.78). Observational studies yielded inconsistent results. Secondary outcomes showed no consistent differences. Evidence certainty was very low because of risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. Current evidence regarding opioid pretreatment effect on postintubation hypotension risk during emergency intubation is limited and conflicting.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. It is devoted to serving the European emergency medicine community and to promoting European standards of training, diagnosis and care in this rapidly growing field.
Published bimonthly, the Journal offers original papers on all aspects of acute injury and sudden illness, including: emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, cardiology, disaster medicine, intensive care, internal medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics, toxicology and trauma care. It addresses issues on the organization of emergency services in hospitals and in the community and examines postgraduate training from European and global perspectives. The Journal also publishes papers focusing on the different models of emergency healthcare delivery in Europe and beyond. With a multidisciplinary approach, the European Journal of Emergency Medicine publishes scientific research, topical reviews, news of meetings and events of interest to the emergency medicine community.
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.