Effect of pretreatment opioids on hemodynamics during emergency intubations: a systematic review.

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Rafael Von Hellmann, Ian Ward A Maia, Brian E Driver, Julia M Dorn De Carvalho, Danielle Gerberi, Fernanda Bellolio, Lucas Oliveira J E Silva
{"title":"Effect of pretreatment opioids on hemodynamics during emergency intubations: a systematic review.","authors":"Rafael Von Hellmann, Ian Ward A Maia, Brian E Driver, Julia M Dorn De Carvalho, Danielle Gerberi, Fernanda Bellolio, Lucas Oliveira J E Silva","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid sequence intubation in emergency settings may involve opioid pretreatment to blunt hemodynamic responses during laryngoscopy and intubation; however, opioids may lead to postintubation hypotension, increasing morbidity and mortality. Global clinical practice varies significantly, reflecting uncertainty about opioids' benefits and risks. Our goal was to evaluate the association between opioid pretreatment and hemodynamic instability, focusing on postintubation hypotension in adult patients undergoing emergency intubation. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing opioid administration vs. no opioids before adult emergency intubations. Searches included Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until November 2024. Elective intubations were excluded. Eight (6708 patients) studies met criteria. The primary outcome was postintubation hypotension, variably defined across studies. Secondary outcomes included hypoxemia, first-attempt success, cardiac arrest, and vasopressor use. Independent reviewers conducted data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and certainty evaluation. Results were qualitatively synthesized. Among 6708 (2757 opioids and 3951 controls) patients, postintubation hypotension incidence varied widely (risk differences: -12.5% favoring opioids to +13.2% favoring controls). The single low-risk randomized study reported opioids increased hypotension (risk difference: 13%, odds ratio: 2.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-3.78). Observational studies yielded inconsistent results. Secondary outcomes showed no consistent differences. Evidence certainty was very low because of risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. Current evidence regarding opioid pretreatment effect on postintubation hypotension risk during emergency intubation is limited and conflicting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid sequence intubation in emergency settings may involve opioid pretreatment to blunt hemodynamic responses during laryngoscopy and intubation; however, opioids may lead to postintubation hypotension, increasing morbidity and mortality. Global clinical practice varies significantly, reflecting uncertainty about opioids' benefits and risks. Our goal was to evaluate the association between opioid pretreatment and hemodynamic instability, focusing on postintubation hypotension in adult patients undergoing emergency intubation. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing opioid administration vs. no opioids before adult emergency intubations. Searches included Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until November 2024. Elective intubations were excluded. Eight (6708 patients) studies met criteria. The primary outcome was postintubation hypotension, variably defined across studies. Secondary outcomes included hypoxemia, first-attempt success, cardiac arrest, and vasopressor use. Independent reviewers conducted data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and certainty evaluation. Results were qualitatively synthesized. Among 6708 (2757 opioids and 3951 controls) patients, postintubation hypotension incidence varied widely (risk differences: -12.5% favoring opioids to +13.2% favoring controls). The single low-risk randomized study reported opioids increased hypotension (risk difference: 13%, odds ratio: 2.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-3.78). Observational studies yielded inconsistent results. Secondary outcomes showed no consistent differences. Evidence certainty was very low because of risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. Current evidence regarding opioid pretreatment effect on postintubation hypotension risk during emergency intubation is limited and conflicting.

阿片类药物预处理对急诊插管期间血流动力学的影响:一项系统综述。
紧急情况下的快速顺序插管可能涉及阿片类药物预处理,以减弱喉镜检查和插管期间的血流动力学反应;然而,阿片类药物可能导致插管后低血压,增加发病率和死亡率。全球临床实践差异很大,反映了阿片类药物益处和风险的不确定性。我们的目的是评估阿片类药物预处理与血流动力学不稳定之间的关系,重点关注急诊插管后成人患者的插管后低血压。我们对成人急诊插管前使用阿片类药物与不使用阿片类药物的随机对照试验和观察性研究进行了系统回顾。搜索包括Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus和Web of Science数据库,直到2024年11月。排除选择性插管。8项(6708例患者)研究符合标准。主要结局是插管后低血压,在不同的研究中定义不同。次要结局包括低氧血症、首次尝试成功、心脏骤停和血管加压药的使用。独立审稿人进行了数据提取、偏倚风险评估和确定性评估。结果定性合成。在6708例(2757例阿片类药物和3951例对照组)患者中,插管后低血压发生率差异很大(风险差异:阿片类药物组为-12.5%,对照组为+13.2%)。单一低风险随机研究报告阿片类药物增加低血压(风险差:13%,优势比:2.15,95%置信区间:1.22-3.78)。观察性研究得出了不一致的结果。次要结果没有一致的差异。由于存在偏倚、不一致和不精确的风险,证据确定性非常低。目前关于阿片类药物预处理对急诊插管后低血压风险的影响的证据有限且相互矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. It is devoted to serving the European emergency medicine community and to promoting European standards of training, diagnosis and care in this rapidly growing field. Published bimonthly, the Journal offers original papers on all aspects of acute injury and sudden illness, including: emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, cardiology, disaster medicine, intensive care, internal medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics, toxicology and trauma care. It addresses issues on the organization of emergency services in hospitals and in the community and examines postgraduate training from European and global perspectives. The Journal also publishes papers focusing on the different models of emergency healthcare delivery in Europe and beyond. With a multidisciplinary approach, the European Journal of Emergency Medicine publishes scientific research, topical reviews, news of meetings and events of interest to the emergency medicine community. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信