Integration of rehabilitation and palliation for people with severe lung disease or heart failure - a scoping review.

IF 1.8 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Clinical Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20018525.2025.2529052
Kristoffer Marsaa, Stig Molsted, Christian Have Dall, Henrik Hansen, Lise Nottelmann, Jette Meelby, Thomas A Schmidt, Laura Hohwü Thomsen, Nina Godtfredsen
{"title":"Integration of rehabilitation and palliation for people with severe lung disease or heart failure - a scoping review.","authors":"Kristoffer Marsaa, Stig Molsted, Christian Have Dall, Henrik Hansen, Lise Nottelmann, Jette Meelby, Thomas A Schmidt, Laura Hohwü Thomsen, Nina Godtfredsen","doi":"10.1080/20018525.2025.2529052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditionally, rehabilitation and palliative care are delivered as separate services, where rehabilitation focuses on regaining physical functions and palliative care on symptom relief and existential support. There is growing recognition of the potential benefit in integrating these approaches. This scoping review explores how integration or coordination of rehabilitation and palliative care is described in the literature, with a focus on heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and interstitial lung disease. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL, identifying 20 relevant publications. Six overarching themes emerged: overlapping treatment goals; timing of services; inclusion of advance care planning (ACP); attention to existential and spiritual dimensions; barriers to integration; and the role of informal caregivers. The majority of the included studies were re-views or expert statements, with few interventional studies. Practical implementation remains limited and poorly defined. While guidelines increasingly support integrated care models, significant challenges persist, including lack of conceptual clarity, limited evidence of effect, and unclear roles for caregivers. There is broad consensus that integration could improve quality of life for both patients and caregivers by combining the functional focus of rehabilitation with palliative symptom management and its holistic approach. While publications support this integration, its implementation in clinical practice remains unclear. A key argument for integration is the overlap in treatment goals and the potential synergy between the two approaches. Several studies highlight the opportunity to incorporate end-of-life discussions, such as ACP, into traditional rehabilitation programs. Introducing palliative care principles earlier in rehabilitation may also increase the number of patients receiving appropriate end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11872,"journal":{"name":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"2529052"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12239239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2025.2529052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, rehabilitation and palliative care are delivered as separate services, where rehabilitation focuses on regaining physical functions and palliative care on symptom relief and existential support. There is growing recognition of the potential benefit in integrating these approaches. This scoping review explores how integration or coordination of rehabilitation and palliative care is described in the literature, with a focus on heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and interstitial lung disease. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL, identifying 20 relevant publications. Six overarching themes emerged: overlapping treatment goals; timing of services; inclusion of advance care planning (ACP); attention to existential and spiritual dimensions; barriers to integration; and the role of informal caregivers. The majority of the included studies were re-views or expert statements, with few interventional studies. Practical implementation remains limited and poorly defined. While guidelines increasingly support integrated care models, significant challenges persist, including lack of conceptual clarity, limited evidence of effect, and unclear roles for caregivers. There is broad consensus that integration could improve quality of life for both patients and caregivers by combining the functional focus of rehabilitation with palliative symptom management and its holistic approach. While publications support this integration, its implementation in clinical practice remains unclear. A key argument for integration is the overlap in treatment goals and the potential synergy between the two approaches. Several studies highlight the opportunity to incorporate end-of-life discussions, such as ACP, into traditional rehabilitation programs. Introducing palliative care principles earlier in rehabilitation may also increase the number of patients receiving appropriate end-of-life care.

严重肺部疾病或心力衰竭患者康复和姑息治疗的整合——范围综述
传统上,康复和姑息治疗是作为单独的服务提供的,其中康复侧重于恢复身体功能,而姑息治疗侧重于症状缓解和生存支持。人们越来越认识到综合这些方法的潜在好处。这篇综述探讨了康复和姑息治疗的整合或协调是如何在文献中描述的,重点是心力衰竭、慢性阻塞性肺疾病和间质性肺疾病。在MEDLINE, EMBASE和CINAHL中进行了系统检索,确定了20篇相关出版物。出现了六个总体主题:重叠的治疗目标;服务时间安排;纳入预先护理计划;关注存在和精神层面;一体化障碍;以及非正式照顾者的角色。大多数纳入的研究是回顾或专家陈述,很少有干预性研究。实际实施仍然有限,而且定义不清。虽然指南越来越多地支持综合护理模式,但仍然存在重大挑战,包括缺乏概念清晰度,效果证据有限,以及护理人员的角色不明确。广泛的共识是,通过将康复的功能重点与姑息性症状管理及其整体方法相结合,整合可以改善患者和护理人员的生活质量。虽然出版物支持这种整合,但其在临床实践中的实施仍不清楚。整合的一个关键论点是治疗目标的重叠和两种方法之间潜在的协同作用。一些研究强调了将临终讨论(如ACP)纳入传统康复计划的机会。在康复早期引入姑息治疗原则也可能增加接受适当临终护理的患者数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信